Alexander Adamson, James Dodd, Thomas Wilkinson, James M Calvert, George W Nava, Peter Van Geffen, Jennifer K Quint
{"title":"满足成人急性哮喘最佳实践标准与30天和90天再入院之间的关系:全国队列研究","authors":"Alexander Adamson, James Dodd, Thomas Wilkinson, James M Calvert, George W Nava, Peter Van Geffen, Jennifer K Quint","doi":"10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether meeting the NHS best practice tariff standard of care and its constituent elements for hospital admission of adults with acute asthma in England is associated with reduced 30 day and 90 day readmission to hospital.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Nationwide cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Secondary care in England, based on data collected from the 2022-23 National Respiratory Audit Programme adult asthma audit, linked with data from Hospital Episode Statistics, 1 April 2022 to 30 June 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>12 964 patients from 151 hospitals admitted with acute asthma to hospitals in England that took part in the National Respiratory Audit Programme and had their data entered, who were eligible for linkage with Hospital Episode Statistics data, were recorded as male or female sex, and were alive at discharge.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>30 and 90 day hospital readmission for asthma or any cause. Association between readmission and meeting best practice tariff standard of care and its constituent elements, adjusted for potential confounders and including a clustering effect for hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3627 (28.0%) patients were documented as having received the best practice tariff standard of care (a respiratory specialist review within 24 hours of admission and a discharge bundle with key good practice elements). 538 (4.1%) and 1077 (8.3%) patients were readmitted to hospital with asthma within 30 and 90 days, respectively. Receiving best practice tariff standard of care was not associated with either readmission (30 day asthma readmission adjusted odds ratio 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71 to 1.08); 90 day adjusted odds ratio 1.01 (0.87 to 1.17)), and nor was receiving a respiratory specialist review within 24 hours of arrival (30 day adjusted odds ratio 0.92 (0.76 to 1.10); 90 day adjusted odds ratio 1.01 (0.89 to 1.16)). Receiving a discharge bundle was associated with reduced readmission (30 day adjusted odds ratio 0.61 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.75), number needed to treat 68; 90 day adjusted odds ratio 0.77 (0.65 to 0.89), number needed to treat 67), as was receiving a respiratory specialist review at any point (30 day adjusted odds ratio 0.70 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.89), number needed to treat 75). 79.5% of participants who received a respiratory specialist review received a discharge bundle (8596/10 816) compared with 19.4% of those who did not receive a specialist review (417/2148).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, components of the adult asthma discharge bundle were associated with reduced readmission to hospital for asthma. Best practice tariffs should be evidence based to improve quality of care and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72433,"journal":{"name":"BMJ medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"e001398"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between meeting adult acute asthma best practice tariff standard of care and 30 day and 90 day hospital readmission: nationwide cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Adamson, James Dodd, Thomas Wilkinson, James M Calvert, George W Nava, Peter Van Geffen, Jennifer K Quint\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether meeting the NHS best practice tariff standard of care and its constituent elements for hospital admission of adults with acute asthma in England is associated with reduced 30 day and 90 day readmission to hospital.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Nationwide cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Secondary care in England, based on data collected from the 2022-23 National Respiratory Audit Programme adult asthma audit, linked with data from Hospital Episode Statistics, 1 April 2022 to 30 June 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>12 964 patients from 151 hospitals admitted with acute asthma to hospitals in England that took part in the National Respiratory Audit Programme and had their data entered, who were eligible for linkage with Hospital Episode Statistics data, were recorded as male or female sex, and were alive at discharge.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>30 and 90 day hospital readmission for asthma or any cause. Association between readmission and meeting best practice tariff standard of care and its constituent elements, adjusted for potential confounders and including a clustering effect for hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3627 (28.0%) patients were documented as having received the best practice tariff standard of care (a respiratory specialist review within 24 hours of admission and a discharge bundle with key good practice elements). 538 (4.1%) and 1077 (8.3%) patients were readmitted to hospital with asthma within 30 and 90 days, respectively. Receiving best practice tariff standard of care was not associated with either readmission (30 day asthma readmission adjusted odds ratio 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71 to 1.08); 90 day adjusted odds ratio 1.01 (0.87 to 1.17)), and nor was receiving a respiratory specialist review within 24 hours of arrival (30 day adjusted odds ratio 0.92 (0.76 to 1.10); 90 day adjusted odds ratio 1.01 (0.89 to 1.16)). Receiving a discharge bundle was associated with reduced readmission (30 day adjusted odds ratio 0.61 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.75), number needed to treat 68; 90 day adjusted odds ratio 0.77 (0.65 to 0.89), number needed to treat 67), as was receiving a respiratory specialist review at any point (30 day adjusted odds ratio 0.70 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.89), number needed to treat 75). 79.5% of participants who received a respiratory specialist review received a discharge bundle (8596/10 816) compared with 19.4% of those who did not receive a specialist review (417/2148).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, components of the adult asthma discharge bundle were associated with reduced readmission to hospital for asthma. Best practice tariffs should be evidence based to improve quality of care and patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ medicine\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"e001398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323527/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估英格兰成人急性哮喘患者入院是否符合NHS最佳实践标准及其构成要素与减少30天和90天再入院率有关。设计:全国队列研究。背景:基于2022-23年国家呼吸审计计划成人哮喘审计收集的数据,并与2022年4月1日至2023年6月30日医院发作统计数据相关联的英格兰二级保健。参与者:来自英国151家医院的12964名急性哮喘患者,这些患者参加了国家呼吸审计计划并输入了他们的数据,他们有资格与医院发作统计数据联系,记录为男性或女性,出院时还活着。主要结局指标:因哮喘或任何原因再入院30天和90天。再入院与达到最佳做法收费标准及其构成要素之间的关联,根据潜在混杂因素进行调整,并包括医院的聚类效应。结果:3627例(28.0%)患者被记录为接受了最佳实践标准护理(入院24小时内的呼吸系统专家审查和出院包,其中包括关键的良好实践要素)。在30天和90天内分别有538例(4.1%)和1077例(8.3%)患者因哮喘再次入院。接受最佳实践标准护理与再入院均无关联(30天哮喘再入院调整优势比0.88(95%可信区间(CI) 0.71至1.08);90天调整优势比1.01(0.87至1.17)),并且在到达24小时内也没有接受呼吸专科检查(30天调整优势比0.92(0.76至1.10);90天调整优势比1.01(0.89 - 1.16))。接受出院束与减少再入院相关(30天调整优势比0.61 (95% CI 0.50至0.75),需要治疗的人数为68;90天调整优势比0.77(0.65至0.89),需要治疗的人数67人),在任何时候接受呼吸专家复查的人数也是如此(30天调整优势比0.70 (95% CI 0.55至0.89),需要治疗的人数75人)。接受呼吸系统专家检查的参与者中,79.5%的人收到了出院包(8596/10 816),而没有接受专家检查的参与者中,这一比例为19.4%(417/2148)。结论:在这项研究中,成人哮喘出院束的组成部分与哮喘再入院率降低有关。最佳做法收费应以证据为基础,以改善护理质量和患者预后。
Association between meeting adult acute asthma best practice tariff standard of care and 30 day and 90 day hospital readmission: nationwide cohort study.
Objective: To assess whether meeting the NHS best practice tariff standard of care and its constituent elements for hospital admission of adults with acute asthma in England is associated with reduced 30 day and 90 day readmission to hospital.
Design: Nationwide cohort study.
Setting: Secondary care in England, based on data collected from the 2022-23 National Respiratory Audit Programme adult asthma audit, linked with data from Hospital Episode Statistics, 1 April 2022 to 30 June 2023.
Participants: 12 964 patients from 151 hospitals admitted with acute asthma to hospitals in England that took part in the National Respiratory Audit Programme and had their data entered, who were eligible for linkage with Hospital Episode Statistics data, were recorded as male or female sex, and were alive at discharge.
Main outcome measures: 30 and 90 day hospital readmission for asthma or any cause. Association between readmission and meeting best practice tariff standard of care and its constituent elements, adjusted for potential confounders and including a clustering effect for hospital.
Results: 3627 (28.0%) patients were documented as having received the best practice tariff standard of care (a respiratory specialist review within 24 hours of admission and a discharge bundle with key good practice elements). 538 (4.1%) and 1077 (8.3%) patients were readmitted to hospital with asthma within 30 and 90 days, respectively. Receiving best practice tariff standard of care was not associated with either readmission (30 day asthma readmission adjusted odds ratio 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71 to 1.08); 90 day adjusted odds ratio 1.01 (0.87 to 1.17)), and nor was receiving a respiratory specialist review within 24 hours of arrival (30 day adjusted odds ratio 0.92 (0.76 to 1.10); 90 day adjusted odds ratio 1.01 (0.89 to 1.16)). Receiving a discharge bundle was associated with reduced readmission (30 day adjusted odds ratio 0.61 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.75), number needed to treat 68; 90 day adjusted odds ratio 0.77 (0.65 to 0.89), number needed to treat 67), as was receiving a respiratory specialist review at any point (30 day adjusted odds ratio 0.70 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.89), number needed to treat 75). 79.5% of participants who received a respiratory specialist review received a discharge bundle (8596/10 816) compared with 19.4% of those who did not receive a specialist review (417/2148).
Conclusions: In this study, components of the adult asthma discharge bundle were associated with reduced readmission to hospital for asthma. Best practice tariffs should be evidence based to improve quality of care and patient outcomes.