Adriano Carneiro da Costa, Vitoria Alessandra Duarte, Fernando Santa Cruz, Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Jayant Kumar, Isabella Reccia, Álvaro Antonio Bandeira Ferraz, Nagy Habib
{"title":"局部晚期胰腺癌患者行胰十二指肠切除术联合血管重建与单纯化疗:一项系统综述。","authors":"Adriano Carneiro da Costa, Vitoria Alessandra Duarte, Fernando Santa Cruz, Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Jayant Kumar, Isabella Reccia, Álvaro Antonio Bandeira Ferraz, Nagy Habib","doi":"10.1590/0102-67202025000021e1890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pancreatic cancer is still a terrifying condition that has a high mortality rate due to its rapid progression and treatment complexity. However, there is still no consensus on what the gold standard of treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to review the current evidence-based data on treatment strategies for LAPC, comparing pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular reconstruction (PDVR) and chemotherapy alone (CA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, while progression-free survival (PFS) was the secondary endpoint. The included studies were published between 2013 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 relevant papers were found in the literature search. The median PFS duration for CA varied from 3.22 to 11.7 months, whereas the median overall survival (mOS) varied from 5.95 to 23.0 months. The mOS ranged from 12.7 to 24.9 months and the median PFS time ranged from 8.5 to 22.5 months for patients submitted to neoadjuvant therapy followed by PDVR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LAPC presents worse outcomes when patients are submitted to CA with gemcitabine only, or when patients undergo upfront PDVR.</p>","PeriodicalId":72298,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery","volume":"38 ","pages":"e1890"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12324770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular reconstruction versus chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Adriano Carneiro da Costa, Vitoria Alessandra Duarte, Fernando Santa Cruz, Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Jayant Kumar, Isabella Reccia, Álvaro Antonio Bandeira Ferraz, Nagy Habib\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0102-67202025000021e1890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pancreatic cancer is still a terrifying condition that has a high mortality rate due to its rapid progression and treatment complexity. However, there is still no consensus on what the gold standard of treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to review the current evidence-based data on treatment strategies for LAPC, comparing pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular reconstruction (PDVR) and chemotherapy alone (CA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, while progression-free survival (PFS) was the secondary endpoint. The included studies were published between 2013 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 relevant papers were found in the literature search. The median PFS duration for CA varied from 3.22 to 11.7 months, whereas the median overall survival (mOS) varied from 5.95 to 23.0 months. The mOS ranged from 12.7 to 24.9 months and the median PFS time ranged from 8.5 to 22.5 months for patients submitted to neoadjuvant therapy followed by PDVR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LAPC presents worse outcomes when patients are submitted to CA with gemcitabine only, or when patients undergo upfront PDVR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"e1890\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12324770/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-67202025000021e1890\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-67202025000021e1890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular reconstruction versus chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.
Background: Pancreatic cancer is still a terrifying condition that has a high mortality rate due to its rapid progression and treatment complexity. However, there is still no consensus on what the gold standard of treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is.
Aims: The aim of this study was to review the current evidence-based data on treatment strategies for LAPC, comparing pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular reconstruction (PDVR) and chemotherapy alone (CA).
Methods: This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, while progression-free survival (PFS) was the secondary endpoint. The included studies were published between 2013 and 2023.
Results: A total of 16 relevant papers were found in the literature search. The median PFS duration for CA varied from 3.22 to 11.7 months, whereas the median overall survival (mOS) varied from 5.95 to 23.0 months. The mOS ranged from 12.7 to 24.9 months and the median PFS time ranged from 8.5 to 22.5 months for patients submitted to neoadjuvant therapy followed by PDVR.
Conclusions: LAPC presents worse outcomes when patients are submitted to CA with gemcitabine only, or when patients undergo upfront PDVR.