临床医生对入门级前庭物理治疗的重要知识、技能和能力的认识。

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Andrew E Littmann, Holly J Roberts, Diane M Wrisley, Lisa L Heusel-Gillig, Charles M Plishka, Anne K Galgon
{"title":"临床医生对入门级前庭物理治疗的重要知识、技能和能力的认识。","authors":"Andrew E Littmann, Holly J Roberts, Diane M Wrisley, Lisa L Heusel-Gillig, Charles M Plishka, Anne K Galgon","doi":"10.1097/NPT.0000000000000531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>No clear consensus exists regarding the expected proficiency of entry-level physical therapists (PTs) when practicing vestibular physical therapy (VPT). The aims of this research were to: 1) ascertain clinicians' and administrators' expectations of entry-level PTs' knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSA) for practicing VPT, and 2) explore correlations between clinician characteristics and their expectations for VPT KSA and performance level for entry-level PTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PTs and PT managers in the United States were invited to complete a survey consisting of 3 parts: 1) clinician/entity demographics, 2) importance of knowledge in foundational sciences, diagnostic groups, examination and intervention skills, and clinical decision-making, and 3) level of expected clinical performance. Rating frequencies and Spearman correlation coefficients between respondent characteristics and survey responses were calculated. Clinical expertise was dichotomized and differences between ratings were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred fifty-eight respondents completed the survey, prioritizing KSAs of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (70.0%), postconcussion dizziness (45.1%), and vestibular hypofunction (43.4%) as most important. Eighty-three percent of respondents expected competence for VPT at graduation as advanced beginner (26.7%), intermediate (33.6%), or advanced intermediate (22.4%). Relationships between respondent characteristics and survey responses were fair to poor. Experienced clinicians rated item importance higher than novices, but their expected competence levels did not differ.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Differences were found between expert and novice clinicians regarding the importance of VPT KSA, but certain items were deemed important for entry-level practice. The findings lay the groundwork for the development of recommendations for entry-level VPT curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":49030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinician Perceptions of Important Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities for Entry-Level Vestibular Physical Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew E Littmann, Holly J Roberts, Diane M Wrisley, Lisa L Heusel-Gillig, Charles M Plishka, Anne K Galgon\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NPT.0000000000000531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>No clear consensus exists regarding the expected proficiency of entry-level physical therapists (PTs) when practicing vestibular physical therapy (VPT). The aims of this research were to: 1) ascertain clinicians' and administrators' expectations of entry-level PTs' knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSA) for practicing VPT, and 2) explore correlations between clinician characteristics and their expectations for VPT KSA and performance level for entry-level PTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PTs and PT managers in the United States were invited to complete a survey consisting of 3 parts: 1) clinician/entity demographics, 2) importance of knowledge in foundational sciences, diagnostic groups, examination and intervention skills, and clinical decision-making, and 3) level of expected clinical performance. Rating frequencies and Spearman correlation coefficients between respondent characteristics and survey responses were calculated. Clinical expertise was dichotomized and differences between ratings were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred fifty-eight respondents completed the survey, prioritizing KSAs of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (70.0%), postconcussion dizziness (45.1%), and vestibular hypofunction (43.4%) as most important. Eighty-three percent of respondents expected competence for VPT at graduation as advanced beginner (26.7%), intermediate (33.6%), or advanced intermediate (22.4%). Relationships between respondent characteristics and survey responses were fair to poor. Experienced clinicians rated item importance higher than novices, but their expected competence levels did not differ.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Differences were found between expert and novice clinicians regarding the importance of VPT KSA, but certain items were deemed important for entry-level practice. The findings lay the groundwork for the development of recommendations for entry-level VPT curriculum.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000531\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000531","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:关于入门级物理治疗师(PTs)在进行前庭物理治疗(VPT)时的预期熟练程度没有明确的共识。本研究的目的是:1)了解临床医生和行政管理人员对初级临床PTs知识、技能和能力(KSA)的期望;2)探讨临床医生特征与他们对初级临床PTs知识、技能和能力的期望之间的关系。方法:邀请美国的PT和PT管理人员完成一项由3部分组成的调查:1)临床医生/实体人口统计学;2)基础科学知识、诊断组、检查和干预技能以及临床决策的重要性;3)预期临床表现水平。计算被调查者特征与调查回答之间的评分频率和Spearman相关系数。将临床专业知识进行二分类,并用Mann-Whitney U检验比较各评分之间的差异。结果:458名受访者完成了调查,其中良性阵发性位置性眩晕(70.0%)、脑震荡后头晕(45.1%)和前庭功能减退(43.4%)是最重要的ksa。83%的受访者期望毕业时VPT的能力为高级初级(26.7%),中级(33.6%)或高级中级(22.4%)。被调查者的特征和调查结果之间的关系是公平的。经验丰富的临床医生对项目重要性的评价高于新手,但他们的预期能力水平没有差异。讨论和结论:在VPT KSA的重要性方面,专家和新手临床医生之间存在差异,但某些项目被认为对入门级实践很重要。研究结果为制定入门级VPT课程建议奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinician Perceptions of Important Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities for Entry-Level Vestibular Physical Therapy.

Background and purpose: No clear consensus exists regarding the expected proficiency of entry-level physical therapists (PTs) when practicing vestibular physical therapy (VPT). The aims of this research were to: 1) ascertain clinicians' and administrators' expectations of entry-level PTs' knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSA) for practicing VPT, and 2) explore correlations between clinician characteristics and their expectations for VPT KSA and performance level for entry-level PTs.

Methods: PTs and PT managers in the United States were invited to complete a survey consisting of 3 parts: 1) clinician/entity demographics, 2) importance of knowledge in foundational sciences, diagnostic groups, examination and intervention skills, and clinical decision-making, and 3) level of expected clinical performance. Rating frequencies and Spearman correlation coefficients between respondent characteristics and survey responses were calculated. Clinical expertise was dichotomized and differences between ratings were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: Four hundred fifty-eight respondents completed the survey, prioritizing KSAs of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (70.0%), postconcussion dizziness (45.1%), and vestibular hypofunction (43.4%) as most important. Eighty-three percent of respondents expected competence for VPT at graduation as advanced beginner (26.7%), intermediate (33.6%), or advanced intermediate (22.4%). Relationships between respondent characteristics and survey responses were fair to poor. Experienced clinicians rated item importance higher than novices, but their expected competence levels did not differ.

Discussion and conclusion: Differences were found between expert and novice clinicians regarding the importance of VPT KSA, but certain items were deemed important for entry-level practice. The findings lay the groundwork for the development of recommendations for entry-level VPT curriculum.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy
Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy (JNPT) is an indexed resource for dissemination of research-based evidence related to neurologic physical therapy intervention. High standards of quality are maintained through a rigorous, double-blinded, peer-review process and adherence to standards recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. With an international editorial board made up of preeminent researchers and clinicians, JNPT publishes articles of global relevance for examination, evaluation, prognosis, intervention, and outcomes for individuals with movement deficits due to neurologic conditions. Through systematic reviews, research articles, case studies, and clinical perspectives, JNPT promotes the integration of evidence into theory, education, research, and practice of neurologic physical therapy, spanning the continuum from pathophysiology to societal participation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信