1例4岁男童继发于尿道结石的急性尿潴留:我们如何处理这个罕见的病例。

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
European Journal of Pediatric Surgery Reports Pub Date : 2025-08-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2663-1933
Thibault Planchamp, Pierre Estournes, Adrien Boileau, Solène Joseph, Mathilde Piraprez, Florian Laclergerie, Luana Carfagna, Olivier Abbo
{"title":"1例4岁男童继发于尿道结石的急性尿潴留:我们如何处理这个罕见的病例。","authors":"Thibault Planchamp, Pierre Estournes, Adrien Boileau, Solène Joseph, Mathilde Piraprez, Florian Laclergerie, Luana Carfagna, Olivier Abbo","doi":"10.1055/a-2663-1933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urethral stone impaction (USI) is an extremely rare cause of acute urinary retention (AUR) in pediatric urology. Few case reports are available, and no consensus guidelines currently exist for managing this condition. We describe our management of such a case and provide a review of the relevant literature. A 4-year-old boy with no prior urological history presented to our emergency department with abdominal pain lasting 8 days. An ultrasound performed 5 days earlier identified a 7-mm stone at the ureterovesical junction. Symptomatic treatment with paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was initiated. However, dysuria, painful penile swelling, and AUR developed 7 days after the onset of pain. A CT scan revealed bilateral hydronephrosis, urinary retention, and a 9-mm stone (980 Hounsfield Units) that had migrated to the proximal anterior urethra. Under general anesthesia, a suprapubic puncture removed 400 mL of urine for analysis. A 7.5-Fr cystoscope was used to identify an impacted stone at the base of the penile urethra. In situ lithotripsy was performed using a holmium laser to fragment the stone in the urethra. The fragments were then pushed into the bladder for complete disintegration. Intravesical fragments were subsequently removed with a Dormia basket. No urethral wounds were observed, and a 10-Fr catheter was placed. Recovery was uneventful, with catheter removal and spontaneous voiding on postoperative day 1. At the 3-month follow-up, the patient exhibited normal voiding and uroflowmetry. AUR secondary to USI is rare and lacks standardized management protocols in pediatric urology. Management of USI should be tailored to the size and location of the calculus, as well as the presence of any associated urethral pathology, with a preference for minimally invasive endoscopic surgery whenever possible. If necessary, urethral in situ laser lithotripsy appears to be a safe and effective treatment option to consider.</p>","PeriodicalId":43204,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery Reports","volume":"13 1","pages":"e35-e40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12324854/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute Urinary Retention Secondary to Urethral Lithiasis in a 4-Year-Old Boy: How We Managed This Rare Case.\",\"authors\":\"Thibault Planchamp, Pierre Estournes, Adrien Boileau, Solène Joseph, Mathilde Piraprez, Florian Laclergerie, Luana Carfagna, Olivier Abbo\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2663-1933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Urethral stone impaction (USI) is an extremely rare cause of acute urinary retention (AUR) in pediatric urology. Few case reports are available, and no consensus guidelines currently exist for managing this condition. We describe our management of such a case and provide a review of the relevant literature. A 4-year-old boy with no prior urological history presented to our emergency department with abdominal pain lasting 8 days. An ultrasound performed 5 days earlier identified a 7-mm stone at the ureterovesical junction. Symptomatic treatment with paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was initiated. However, dysuria, painful penile swelling, and AUR developed 7 days after the onset of pain. A CT scan revealed bilateral hydronephrosis, urinary retention, and a 9-mm stone (980 Hounsfield Units) that had migrated to the proximal anterior urethra. Under general anesthesia, a suprapubic puncture removed 400 mL of urine for analysis. A 7.5-Fr cystoscope was used to identify an impacted stone at the base of the penile urethra. In situ lithotripsy was performed using a holmium laser to fragment the stone in the urethra. The fragments were then pushed into the bladder for complete disintegration. Intravesical fragments were subsequently removed with a Dormia basket. No urethral wounds were observed, and a 10-Fr catheter was placed. Recovery was uneventful, with catheter removal and spontaneous voiding on postoperative day 1. At the 3-month follow-up, the patient exhibited normal voiding and uroflowmetry. AUR secondary to USI is rare and lacks standardized management protocols in pediatric urology. Management of USI should be tailored to the size and location of the calculus, as well as the presence of any associated urethral pathology, with a preference for minimally invasive endoscopic surgery whenever possible. If necessary, urethral in situ laser lithotripsy appears to be a safe and effective treatment option to consider.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery Reports\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"e35-e40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12324854/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2663-1933\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2663-1933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尿道结石嵌塞(USI)是一个极其罕见的原因急性尿潴留(AUR)在儿科泌尿外科。很少有病例报告,目前也没有一致的指导方针来管理这种情况。我们描述了我们的管理这样一个情况下,并提供了相关文献的回顾。一名无泌尿系统病史的4岁男孩因腹痛8天来到急诊科就诊。5天前的超声检查发现输尿管膀胱交界处有一块7毫米的结石。开始使用扑热息痛和非甾体抗炎药对症治疗。然而,疼痛发生7天后出现排尿困难、疼痛性阴茎肿胀和AUR。CT扫描显示双侧肾积水,尿潴留,9毫米结石(980 Hounsfield单位)已迁移到前尿道近端。在全身麻醉下,耻骨上穿刺取出400ml尿液进行分析。使用7.5 fr膀胱镜检查阴茎尿道底部的阻生结石。原位碎石术采用钬激光粉碎尿道内结石。然后将碎片推入膀胱使其完全分解。随后用睡眠篮筐取出膀胱内碎片。未见尿道损伤,置10-Fr导尿管。恢复顺利,术后第1天拔除导管并自然排尿。随访3个月,患者排尿和尿流测量正常。继发于USI的AUR是罕见的,在儿科泌尿外科缺乏标准化的管理方案。USI的治疗应根据结石的大小和位置以及任何相关尿道病理的存在量身定制,尽可能首选微创内窥镜手术。如有必要,尿道原位激光碎石似乎是一种安全有效的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acute Urinary Retention Secondary to Urethral Lithiasis in a 4-Year-Old Boy: How We Managed This Rare Case.

Urethral stone impaction (USI) is an extremely rare cause of acute urinary retention (AUR) in pediatric urology. Few case reports are available, and no consensus guidelines currently exist for managing this condition. We describe our management of such a case and provide a review of the relevant literature. A 4-year-old boy with no prior urological history presented to our emergency department with abdominal pain lasting 8 days. An ultrasound performed 5 days earlier identified a 7-mm stone at the ureterovesical junction. Symptomatic treatment with paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was initiated. However, dysuria, painful penile swelling, and AUR developed 7 days after the onset of pain. A CT scan revealed bilateral hydronephrosis, urinary retention, and a 9-mm stone (980 Hounsfield Units) that had migrated to the proximal anterior urethra. Under general anesthesia, a suprapubic puncture removed 400 mL of urine for analysis. A 7.5-Fr cystoscope was used to identify an impacted stone at the base of the penile urethra. In situ lithotripsy was performed using a holmium laser to fragment the stone in the urethra. The fragments were then pushed into the bladder for complete disintegration. Intravesical fragments were subsequently removed with a Dormia basket. No urethral wounds were observed, and a 10-Fr catheter was placed. Recovery was uneventful, with catheter removal and spontaneous voiding on postoperative day 1. At the 3-month follow-up, the patient exhibited normal voiding and uroflowmetry. AUR secondary to USI is rare and lacks standardized management protocols in pediatric urology. Management of USI should be tailored to the size and location of the calculus, as well as the presence of any associated urethral pathology, with a preference for minimally invasive endoscopic surgery whenever possible. If necessary, urethral in situ laser lithotripsy appears to be a safe and effective treatment option to consider.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信