《从政治经济学角度看,世卫组织采纳和实施“最划算的”非传染性疾病政策的障碍和机遇:一项复杂的系统审查》评论

IF 5.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lana M Elliott, Stephanie M Topp
{"title":"《从政治经济学角度看,世卫组织采纳和实施“最划算的”非传染性疾病政策的障碍和机遇:一项复杂的系统审查》评论","authors":"Lana M Elliott, Stephanie M Topp","doi":"10.34172/ijhpm.9145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The World Health Organization's (WHO's) non-communicable disease (NCD) Best Buys provides a comprehensive package of technically sound policy advice in response to the growing global burden of NCDs. However, despite these policy mechanisms being touted as beneficial to countries' health and economic bottom lines, uptake has remained slow and globally disparate. Loffreda and colleagues' analysis draws attention to the importance of political economy forces in shaping governments' responses to NCDs and, in particular, their uptake of the NCD Best Buys. In building on this work, we examine the history and instances of contemporary application of the NCD Best Buys to consider the limitations of these technocratically framed policy recommendations. In doing so, we highlight the risks present in focusing on the technical - while negating the contextually nuanced political - dimension of policy adoption. We thus advocate for greater political engagement in policy design and implementation as well as a revitalised \"double-loop\" approach to NCD policy learning, where policy and system feedback is not solely used to reify policy advice but rather interrogate the assumptions underpinning such.</p>","PeriodicalId":14135,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","volume":"14 ","pages":"9145"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Time Like the Present: Centring Politics in the Global NCD Policy Agenda Comment on \\\"Barriers and Opportunities for WHO 'Best Buys' Non-Communicable Disease Policy Adoption and Implementation From a Political Economy Perspective: A Complexity Systematic Review\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Lana M Elliott, Stephanie M Topp\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/ijhpm.9145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The World Health Organization's (WHO's) non-communicable disease (NCD) Best Buys provides a comprehensive package of technically sound policy advice in response to the growing global burden of NCDs. However, despite these policy mechanisms being touted as beneficial to countries' health and economic bottom lines, uptake has remained slow and globally disparate. Loffreda and colleagues' analysis draws attention to the importance of political economy forces in shaping governments' responses to NCDs and, in particular, their uptake of the NCD Best Buys. In building on this work, we examine the history and instances of contemporary application of the NCD Best Buys to consider the limitations of these technocratically framed policy recommendations. In doing so, we highlight the risks present in focusing on the technical - while negating the contextually nuanced political - dimension of policy adoption. We thus advocate for greater political engagement in policy design and implementation as well as a revitalised \\\"double-loop\\\" approach to NCD policy learning, where policy and system feedback is not solely used to reify policy advice but rather interrogate the assumptions underpinning such.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Policy and Management\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"9145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337160/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Policy and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.9145\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.9145","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界卫生组织(世卫组织)的“百思买”非传染性疾病网站为应对日益严重的全球非传染性疾病负担,提供了一整套技术上合理的政策咨询意见。然而,尽管这些政策机制被吹捧为有利于各国的健康和经济底线,但吸收速度仍然缓慢,而且在全球范围内存在差异。Loffreda及其同事的分析使人们注意到政治经济力量在塑造政府对非传染性疾病的反应方面的重要性,特别是它们对非传染性疾病Best buy的采用。在这项工作的基础上,我们研究了非传染性疾病百思买的历史和当代应用实例,以考虑这些技术框架政策建议的局限性。在这样做的过程中,我们强调了专注于技术方面的风险,同时否定了政策采用的背景微妙的政治层面。因此,我们提倡在政策设计和实施中加强政治参与,以及重振非传染性疾病政策学习的“双循环”方法,在这种方法中,政策和系统反馈不仅用于具体化政策建议,而且还用于质疑支撑这些建议的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No Time Like the Present: Centring Politics in the Global NCD Policy Agenda Comment on "Barriers and Opportunities for WHO 'Best Buys' Non-Communicable Disease Policy Adoption and Implementation From a Political Economy Perspective: A Complexity Systematic Review".

The World Health Organization's (WHO's) non-communicable disease (NCD) Best Buys provides a comprehensive package of technically sound policy advice in response to the growing global burden of NCDs. However, despite these policy mechanisms being touted as beneficial to countries' health and economic bottom lines, uptake has remained slow and globally disparate. Loffreda and colleagues' analysis draws attention to the importance of political economy forces in shaping governments' responses to NCDs and, in particular, their uptake of the NCD Best Buys. In building on this work, we examine the history and instances of contemporary application of the NCD Best Buys to consider the limitations of these technocratically framed policy recommendations. In doing so, we highlight the risks present in focusing on the technical - while negating the contextually nuanced political - dimension of policy adoption. We thus advocate for greater political engagement in policy design and implementation as well as a revitalised "double-loop" approach to NCD policy learning, where policy and system feedback is not solely used to reify policy advice but rather interrogate the assumptions underpinning such.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
International Journal of Health Policy and Management Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Policy and Management (IJHPM) is a monthly open access, peer-reviewed journal which serves as an international and interdisciplinary setting for the dissemination of health policy and management research. It brings together individual specialties from different fields, notably health management/policy/economics, epidemiology, social/public policy, and philosophy into a dynamic academic mix.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信