April Armstrong, Bruce Strober, Paolo Gisondi, Kate K Orroth, Myriam Cordey, Shia T Kent, Cynthia Deignan, Shauna Jardon, Rohini K Hernandez, M Alan Brookhart, Linda Stein Gold
{"title":"早期应用阿普米司特治疗银屑病和有限皮肤受累患者的益处:来自真实世界回顾性研究的结果。","authors":"April Armstrong, Bruce Strober, Paolo Gisondi, Kate K Orroth, Myriam Cordey, Shia T Kent, Cynthia Deignan, Shauna Jardon, Rohini K Hernandez, M Alan Brookhart, Linda Stein Gold","doi":"10.1007/s13555-025-01466-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many patients with psoriasis remain on topical therapy despite meeting criteria for systemic therapy. Our objective was to estimate the effect of earlier initiation of apremilast on attaining body surface area (BSA) treatment targets in patients with psoriasis in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study conducted in the OM1 database analyzed patients with psoriasis and a BSA value between ≥ 1 and ≤ 10% (on index date) who had initiated apremilast or a topical treatment. Relative risks were used to compare achieved BSA targets across treatment groups. Confounding, selection bias, and missing data may have been present, but measures were taken to limit their impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3589 apremilast initiators, 2073 (57.8%) initiated early (≤ 6 months after index date) and 1516 (42.2%) initiated late (> 6 months); separately, 9777 patients initiated their second or later topical treatment (topical users). Compared with early initiators, late initiators had higher BSA values at treatment initiation. Early apremilast initiators were more likely than topical users to achieve BSA ≤ 1% or ≥ 75% improvement in BSA (BSA-75) at 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation: for early apremilast initiators, the relative risks of achieving BSA ≤ 1% and BSA-75 compared with topical users were 1.54 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27, 1.87) and 1.52 (95% CI: 1.21, 1.89), respectively, at 6 months, and 1.49 (95% CI: 1.23, 1.80) and 1.50 (95% CI: 1.22, 1.85), respectively, at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Earlier initiation of apremilast, an oral systemic treatment, was associated with lower cumulative disease burden and increased likelihood of attaining BSA goals compared with topical users.</p>","PeriodicalId":11186,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"2911-2923"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits of Earlier Apremilast Initiation in Patients with Psoriasis and Limited Skin Involvement: Results from a Real-World Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"April Armstrong, Bruce Strober, Paolo Gisondi, Kate K Orroth, Myriam Cordey, Shia T Kent, Cynthia Deignan, Shauna Jardon, Rohini K Hernandez, M Alan Brookhart, Linda Stein Gold\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13555-025-01466-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many patients with psoriasis remain on topical therapy despite meeting criteria for systemic therapy. Our objective was to estimate the effect of earlier initiation of apremilast on attaining body surface area (BSA) treatment targets in patients with psoriasis in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study conducted in the OM1 database analyzed patients with psoriasis and a BSA value between ≥ 1 and ≤ 10% (on index date) who had initiated apremilast or a topical treatment. Relative risks were used to compare achieved BSA targets across treatment groups. Confounding, selection bias, and missing data may have been present, but measures were taken to limit their impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3589 apremilast initiators, 2073 (57.8%) initiated early (≤ 6 months after index date) and 1516 (42.2%) initiated late (> 6 months); separately, 9777 patients initiated their second or later topical treatment (topical users). Compared with early initiators, late initiators had higher BSA values at treatment initiation. Early apremilast initiators were more likely than topical users to achieve BSA ≤ 1% or ≥ 75% improvement in BSA (BSA-75) at 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation: for early apremilast initiators, the relative risks of achieving BSA ≤ 1% and BSA-75 compared with topical users were 1.54 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27, 1.87) and 1.52 (95% CI: 1.21, 1.89), respectively, at 6 months, and 1.49 (95% CI: 1.23, 1.80) and 1.50 (95% CI: 1.22, 1.85), respectively, at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Earlier initiation of apremilast, an oral systemic treatment, was associated with lower cumulative disease burden and increased likelihood of attaining BSA goals compared with topical users.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatology and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2911-2923\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454763/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatology and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-025-01466-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-025-01466-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Benefits of Earlier Apremilast Initiation in Patients with Psoriasis and Limited Skin Involvement: Results from a Real-World Retrospective Study.
Introduction: Many patients with psoriasis remain on topical therapy despite meeting criteria for systemic therapy. Our objective was to estimate the effect of earlier initiation of apremilast on attaining body surface area (BSA) treatment targets in patients with psoriasis in a real-world setting.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study conducted in the OM1 database analyzed patients with psoriasis and a BSA value between ≥ 1 and ≤ 10% (on index date) who had initiated apremilast or a topical treatment. Relative risks were used to compare achieved BSA targets across treatment groups. Confounding, selection bias, and missing data may have been present, but measures were taken to limit their impact.
Results: Of 3589 apremilast initiators, 2073 (57.8%) initiated early (≤ 6 months after index date) and 1516 (42.2%) initiated late (> 6 months); separately, 9777 patients initiated their second or later topical treatment (topical users). Compared with early initiators, late initiators had higher BSA values at treatment initiation. Early apremilast initiators were more likely than topical users to achieve BSA ≤ 1% or ≥ 75% improvement in BSA (BSA-75) at 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation: for early apremilast initiators, the relative risks of achieving BSA ≤ 1% and BSA-75 compared with topical users were 1.54 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27, 1.87) and 1.52 (95% CI: 1.21, 1.89), respectively, at 6 months, and 1.49 (95% CI: 1.23, 1.80) and 1.50 (95% CI: 1.22, 1.85), respectively, at 12 months.
Conclusions: Earlier initiation of apremilast, an oral systemic treatment, was associated with lower cumulative disease burden and increased likelihood of attaining BSA goals compared with topical users.
期刊介绍:
Dermatology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance). The journal is dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of dermatological therapies. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health and epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
Areas of focus include, but are not limited to all clinical aspects of dermatology, such as skin pharmacology; skin development and aging; prevention, diagnosis, and management of skin disorders and melanomas; research into dermal structures and pathology; and all areas of aesthetic dermatology, including skin maintenance, dermatological surgery, and lasers.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports/case series, trial protocols, and short communications. Dermatology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an International and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of quality research, which may be considered of insufficient interest by other journals. The journal appeals to a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world.