Andrea M Roca, Fatima N Anwar, Ishan Khosla, Srinath S Medakkar, Alexandra C Loya, Arash J Sayari, Gregory D Lopez, Kern Singh
{"title":"ACDF患者未能达到早期MCID。","authors":"Andrea M Roca, Fatima N Anwar, Ishan Khosla, Srinath S Medakkar, Alexandra C Loya, Arash J Sayari, Gregory D Lopez, Kern Singh","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to identify factors of early minimal clinically important difference (MCID) failure after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Research on predictors of MCID failure after ACDF is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing primary, elective ACDF were selected from a single spine surgeon database. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, and Visual Analog Scale Neck (VAS-N), VAS-Arm (VAS-A), Neck Disability Index (NDI), patient-reported outcome measurement information system-physical function (PROMIS-PF), 12-item Short Form (SF-12) Mental Component Score (MCS), SF-12 Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS), and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores were collected. A 2-step multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of MCID failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 240 patients were included. Preoperative VAS-N and diagnosis of foraminal stenosis were significant positive predictors of failure. Workers' compensation (WC) was a negative predictor, whereas smoker status and preoperative VAS-A were positive predictors. Preoperative PROMIS-PF, preoperative SF-12 PCS/MCS, and postoperative day 0 narcotic consumption were negative predictors, and length of stay was a positive predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The variations in follow-up compliance among spine surgery patients highlight the importance of identifying predictors of early MCID failure rates to avoid less than favorable patient experiences. In our study, we identified data to suggest that positive predictors of early failure may be associated with higher preoperative neck pain, smoker status, and longer length of stay. In comparison, negative predictors are related to WC insurance, better preoperative physical function and mental health, or postoperative narcotic consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Failure to Reach Early MCID in ACDF Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea M Roca, Fatima N Anwar, Ishan Khosla, Srinath S Medakkar, Alexandra C Loya, Arash J Sayari, Gregory D Lopez, Kern Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to identify factors of early minimal clinically important difference (MCID) failure after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Research on predictors of MCID failure after ACDF is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing primary, elective ACDF were selected from a single spine surgeon database. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, and Visual Analog Scale Neck (VAS-N), VAS-Arm (VAS-A), Neck Disability Index (NDI), patient-reported outcome measurement information system-physical function (PROMIS-PF), 12-item Short Form (SF-12) Mental Component Score (MCS), SF-12 Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS), and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores were collected. A 2-step multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of MCID failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 240 patients were included. Preoperative VAS-N and diagnosis of foraminal stenosis were significant positive predictors of failure. Workers' compensation (WC) was a negative predictor, whereas smoker status and preoperative VAS-A were positive predictors. Preoperative PROMIS-PF, preoperative SF-12 PCS/MCS, and postoperative day 0 narcotic consumption were negative predictors, and length of stay was a positive predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The variations in follow-up compliance among spine surgery patients highlight the importance of identifying predictors of early MCID failure rates to avoid less than favorable patient experiences. In our study, we identified data to suggest that positive predictors of early failure may be associated with higher preoperative neck pain, smoker status, and longer length of stay. In comparison, negative predictors are related to WC insurance, better preoperative physical function and mental health, or postoperative narcotic consumption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001824\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001824","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: The objective of this study is to identify factors of early minimal clinically important difference (MCID) failure after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
Summary of background data: Research on predictors of MCID failure after ACDF is limited.
Methods: Patients undergoing primary, elective ACDF were selected from a single spine surgeon database. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, and Visual Analog Scale Neck (VAS-N), VAS-Arm (VAS-A), Neck Disability Index (NDI), patient-reported outcome measurement information system-physical function (PROMIS-PF), 12-item Short Form (SF-12) Mental Component Score (MCS), SF-12 Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS), and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores were collected. A 2-step multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of MCID failure.
Results: A total of 240 patients were included. Preoperative VAS-N and diagnosis of foraminal stenosis were significant positive predictors of failure. Workers' compensation (WC) was a negative predictor, whereas smoker status and preoperative VAS-A were positive predictors. Preoperative PROMIS-PF, preoperative SF-12 PCS/MCS, and postoperative day 0 narcotic consumption were negative predictors, and length of stay was a positive predictor.
Conclusion: The variations in follow-up compliance among spine surgery patients highlight the importance of identifying predictors of early MCID failure rates to avoid less than favorable patient experiences. In our study, we identified data to suggest that positive predictors of early failure may be associated with higher preoperative neck pain, smoker status, and longer length of stay. In comparison, negative predictors are related to WC insurance, better preoperative physical function and mental health, or postoperative narcotic consumption.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure.
Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
