特杜卢肽治疗短肠综合征患者的生活质量和生活体验:对患者日记的定性分析。

IF 2.9 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Brian Jurewitsch, Colette Peters, Carol Okamoto
{"title":"特杜卢肽治疗短肠综合征患者的生活质量和生活体验:对患者日记的定性分析。","authors":"Brian Jurewitsch, Colette Peters, Carol Okamoto","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the lived experiences and coping strategies of patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS) prescribed teduglutide and weaning off home parenteral nutrition (HPN), and to compare the quality of life (QOL) of these patients to patients with SBS but not prescribed teduglutide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted, with patients recruited from a specialist HPN clinic. Participants completed handwritten semi-structured daily diaries for 6 weeks and a validated Home Parenteral Nutrition-Quality of Life (HPN-QOL) paper-based questionnaire as part of what aimed to be a mixed methods cross-tracks study. Participants were age-matched with patients with SBS receiving HPN but not prescribed teduglutide, and these 'controls' also completed the HPN-QOL questionnaire. Data analysis involved qualitative analysis of diary entries using grounded theory methodology and descriptive analysis of HPN-QOL questionnaire responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five participants completed the study and were matched with four 'controls'. All participants and 'controls' reported a high QOL with no differences observed between patients prescribed and not prescribed teduglutide. Qualitative analysis revealed that participants engaged in iterative cycles of problem-focused action and emotion-focused coping strategies to manage their condition and wean off parenteral nutrition (PN). Key subthemes included polyphagia and pleomorphism in diet, fatigue-related emotional distress and positive reframing using an objective scientific lens. Decisional regret was absent, participants agreed that treatment with teduglutide was the right choice for them, despite its challenges. Their goal of independence from PN was the main motivating factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides valuable insights into the lived experiences and coping strategies of patients with SBS prescribed teduglutide to wean off PN. The findings underscore the importance of healthcare teams understanding these everyday challenges to facilitate shared decision-making and tailor care plans. Further research is needed to explore the long-term impact of teduglutide on QOL, including the validation of tools to screen for fatigue-related emotional distress and the development of targeted interventions to support patients during the weaning process.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of life and lived experience of patients with short bowel syndrome treated with teduglutide and weaning off home parenteral nutrition: a qualitative analysis of patient diaries.\",\"authors\":\"Brian Jurewitsch, Colette Peters, Carol Okamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the lived experiences and coping strategies of patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS) prescribed teduglutide and weaning off home parenteral nutrition (HPN), and to compare the quality of life (QOL) of these patients to patients with SBS but not prescribed teduglutide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted, with patients recruited from a specialist HPN clinic. Participants completed handwritten semi-structured daily diaries for 6 weeks and a validated Home Parenteral Nutrition-Quality of Life (HPN-QOL) paper-based questionnaire as part of what aimed to be a mixed methods cross-tracks study. Participants were age-matched with patients with SBS receiving HPN but not prescribed teduglutide, and these 'controls' also completed the HPN-QOL questionnaire. Data analysis involved qualitative analysis of diary entries using grounded theory methodology and descriptive analysis of HPN-QOL questionnaire responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five participants completed the study and were matched with four 'controls'. All participants and 'controls' reported a high QOL with no differences observed between patients prescribed and not prescribed teduglutide. Qualitative analysis revealed that participants engaged in iterative cycles of problem-focused action and emotion-focused coping strategies to manage their condition and wean off parenteral nutrition (PN). Key subthemes included polyphagia and pleomorphism in diet, fatigue-related emotional distress and positive reframing using an objective scientific lens. Decisional regret was absent, participants agreed that treatment with teduglutide was the right choice for them, despite its challenges. Their goal of independence from PN was the main motivating factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides valuable insights into the lived experiences and coping strategies of patients with SBS prescribed teduglutide to wean off PN. The findings underscore the importance of healthcare teams understanding these everyday challenges to facilitate shared decision-making and tailor care plans. Further research is needed to explore the long-term impact of teduglutide on QOL, including the validation of tools to screen for fatigue-related emotional distress and the development of targeted interventions to support patients during the weaning process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336534/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001818\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨短肠综合征(SBS)患者服用特杜葡肽后停用家庭肠外营养(HPN)的生活经历和应对策略,并将这些患者的生活质量(QOL)与不服用特杜葡肽的SBS患者进行比较。方法:进行定性研究,患者从专科HPN诊所招募。作为混合方法交叉研究的一部分,参与者完成了为期6周的手写半结构化日常日记和一份经过验证的家庭肠外营养-生活质量(HPN-QOL)纸质问卷。参与者与接受HPN治疗但未服用替杜葡肽的SBS患者年龄匹配,这些“对照”也完成了HPN- qol问卷。数据分析包括使用扎根理论方法对日记条目进行定性分析和对HPN-QOL问卷回答进行描述性分析。结果:五名参与者完成了研究,并与四名“对照组”相匹配。所有参与者和“对照组”都报告了较高的生活质量,在服用和未服用特杜鲁肽的患者之间没有观察到差异。定性分析显示,参与者参与了以问题为中心的行动和以情绪为中心的应对策略的迭代循环,以管理他们的状况并戒除肠外营养(PN)。关键的子主题包括饮食中的多食和多形性,疲劳相关的情绪困扰和使用客观科学镜头的积极重构。没有决定性的遗憾,参与者同意用teduglutide治疗对他们来说是正确的选择,尽管它存在挑战。他们脱离PN的目标是主要的激励因素。结论:本研究为SBS患者的生活经历和应对策略提供了有价值的见解。研究结果强调了医疗团队了解这些日常挑战的重要性,以促进共同决策和定制护理计划。需要进一步的研究来探索teduglutide对生活质量的长期影响,包括验证筛选疲劳相关情绪困扰的工具,以及开发有针对性的干预措施来支持患者在断奶过程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of life and lived experience of patients with short bowel syndrome treated with teduglutide and weaning off home parenteral nutrition: a qualitative analysis of patient diaries.

Objective: This study aimed to explore the lived experiences and coping strategies of patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS) prescribed teduglutide and weaning off home parenteral nutrition (HPN), and to compare the quality of life (QOL) of these patients to patients with SBS but not prescribed teduglutide.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted, with patients recruited from a specialist HPN clinic. Participants completed handwritten semi-structured daily diaries for 6 weeks and a validated Home Parenteral Nutrition-Quality of Life (HPN-QOL) paper-based questionnaire as part of what aimed to be a mixed methods cross-tracks study. Participants were age-matched with patients with SBS receiving HPN but not prescribed teduglutide, and these 'controls' also completed the HPN-QOL questionnaire. Data analysis involved qualitative analysis of diary entries using grounded theory methodology and descriptive analysis of HPN-QOL questionnaire responses.

Results: Five participants completed the study and were matched with four 'controls'. All participants and 'controls' reported a high QOL with no differences observed between patients prescribed and not prescribed teduglutide. Qualitative analysis revealed that participants engaged in iterative cycles of problem-focused action and emotion-focused coping strategies to manage their condition and wean off parenteral nutrition (PN). Key subthemes included polyphagia and pleomorphism in diet, fatigue-related emotional distress and positive reframing using an objective scientific lens. Decisional regret was absent, participants agreed that treatment with teduglutide was the right choice for them, despite its challenges. Their goal of independence from PN was the main motivating factor.

Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights into the lived experiences and coping strategies of patients with SBS prescribed teduglutide to wean off PN. The findings underscore the importance of healthcare teams understanding these everyday challenges to facilitate shared decision-making and tailor care plans. Further research is needed to explore the long-term impact of teduglutide on QOL, including the validation of tools to screen for fatigue-related emotional distress and the development of targeted interventions to support patients during the weaning process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信