英国乳糜泻血清学检测的全国调查。

IF 2.9 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Albin Alex, Alex S Hong, Marcus Dimmock, Mohammad I Zaman, Mohamed Adam, Graeme Wild, Hugo A Penny, David S Sanders, Penny Whiting, Martha M C Elwenspoek, Mohamed G Shiha
{"title":"英国乳糜泻血清学检测的全国调查。","authors":"Albin Alex, Alex S Hong, Marcus Dimmock, Mohammad I Zaman, Mohamed Adam, Graeme Wild, Hugo A Penny, David S Sanders, Penny Whiting, Martha M C Elwenspoek, Mohamed G Shiha","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recent evidence supports diagnosing coeliac disease without biopsy in patients with significantly elevated tissue transglutaminase (IgA-tTG) antibodies. However, the implementation of this no-biopsy approach relies on accurate and consistent serological testing across laboratories. In this nationwide survey, we aimed to evaluate the availability and variability of coeliac disease testing across the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional telephone survey of biomedical scientists and laboratory managers from National Health Service trusts and health boards across England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. Data collected included assay types, reporting methods, upper limit of normal (ULN) thresholds, turnaround times, total IgA testing, and anti-endomysial antibodies (EMAs) availability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 356 sites were approached, with a 96% response rate (n=342). Of responding sites, 177 performed coeliac serology tests in-house, while 165 transferred samples externally. Among sites performing tests, 12 different IgA-tTG assays were identified, with considerable variability in ULN thresholds ranging from 3 to 30 IU/mL, even within laboratories using the same assays. The median turnaround time for IgA-tTG results was 7 days (range 1-21 days). Only 43% of laboratories routinely measured total IgA when IgA-tTG was requested. EMA testing was available in 83% of laboratories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant variability exists in coeliac serology testing across UK laboratories which poses a challenge for the implementation of the no-biopsy approach in clinical practice. Efforts to standardise serological testing are urgently needed. Until such standardisation is achieved, local assay validation remains critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nationwide survey of coeliac disease serology testing in the UK.\",\"authors\":\"Albin Alex, Alex S Hong, Marcus Dimmock, Mohammad I Zaman, Mohamed Adam, Graeme Wild, Hugo A Penny, David S Sanders, Penny Whiting, Martha M C Elwenspoek, Mohamed G Shiha\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recent evidence supports diagnosing coeliac disease without biopsy in patients with significantly elevated tissue transglutaminase (IgA-tTG) antibodies. However, the implementation of this no-biopsy approach relies on accurate and consistent serological testing across laboratories. In this nationwide survey, we aimed to evaluate the availability and variability of coeliac disease testing across the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional telephone survey of biomedical scientists and laboratory managers from National Health Service trusts and health boards across England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. Data collected included assay types, reporting methods, upper limit of normal (ULN) thresholds, turnaround times, total IgA testing, and anti-endomysial antibodies (EMAs) availability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 356 sites were approached, with a 96% response rate (n=342). Of responding sites, 177 performed coeliac serology tests in-house, while 165 transferred samples externally. Among sites performing tests, 12 different IgA-tTG assays were identified, with considerable variability in ULN thresholds ranging from 3 to 30 IU/mL, even within laboratories using the same assays. The median turnaround time for IgA-tTG results was 7 days (range 1-21 days). Only 43% of laboratories routinely measured total IgA when IgA-tTG was requested. EMA testing was available in 83% of laboratories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant variability exists in coeliac serology testing across UK laboratories which poses a challenge for the implementation of the no-biopsy approach in clinical practice. Efforts to standardise serological testing are urgently needed. Until such standardisation is achieved, local assay validation remains critical.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336569/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001900\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最近的证据支持在组织转谷氨酰胺酶(IgA-tTG)抗体显著升高的患者中无需活检诊断乳糜泻。然而,这种无活检方法的实施依赖于实验室间准确和一致的血清学检测。在这项全国性的调查中,我们旨在评估英国乳糜泻检测的可用性和可变性。方法:我们对来自英格兰、威尔士、苏格兰和北爱尔兰的国民健康服务信托基金和健康委员会的生物医学科学家和实验室管理人员进行了横断面电话调查。收集的数据包括检测类型、报告方法、正常(ULN)阈值上限、周转时间、总IgA检测和抗肌内膜抗体(EMAs)可用性。结果:共接触356个部位,有效率96% (n=342)。在响应站点中,177个在内部进行乳糜泻血清学检测,165个在外部转移样本。在进行检测的站点中,确定了12种不同的IgA-tTG测定法,即使在使用相同测定法的实验室中,ULN阈值也有相当大的差异,范围从3到30 IU/mL。IgA-tTG结果的中位周转时间为7天(范围1-21天)。当要求IgA- ttg时,只有43%的实验室常规测量总IgA。83%的实验室提供了EMA检测。结论:英国各实验室乳糜泻血清学检测存在显著差异,这对临床实践中实施无活检方法提出了挑战。迫切需要努力使血清学检测标准化。在实现这种标准化之前,本地分析验证仍然至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nationwide survey of coeliac disease serology testing in the UK.

Objective: Recent evidence supports diagnosing coeliac disease without biopsy in patients with significantly elevated tissue transglutaminase (IgA-tTG) antibodies. However, the implementation of this no-biopsy approach relies on accurate and consistent serological testing across laboratories. In this nationwide survey, we aimed to evaluate the availability and variability of coeliac disease testing across the UK.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional telephone survey of biomedical scientists and laboratory managers from National Health Service trusts and health boards across England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. Data collected included assay types, reporting methods, upper limit of normal (ULN) thresholds, turnaround times, total IgA testing, and anti-endomysial antibodies (EMAs) availability.

Results: A total of 356 sites were approached, with a 96% response rate (n=342). Of responding sites, 177 performed coeliac serology tests in-house, while 165 transferred samples externally. Among sites performing tests, 12 different IgA-tTG assays were identified, with considerable variability in ULN thresholds ranging from 3 to 30 IU/mL, even within laboratories using the same assays. The median turnaround time for IgA-tTG results was 7 days (range 1-21 days). Only 43% of laboratories routinely measured total IgA when IgA-tTG was requested. EMA testing was available in 83% of laboratories.

Conclusion: Significant variability exists in coeliac serology testing across UK laboratories which poses a challenge for the implementation of the no-biopsy approach in clinical practice. Efforts to standardise serological testing are urgently needed. Until such standardisation is achieved, local assay validation remains critical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信