在固定良好的股骨干附近使用水泥套螺钉固定髋关节周围假体骨折可能不会影响短期的股骨干存活。

James Shaw,Ruby Patel,Peter K Sculco,Joshua Wright-Chisem,Naomi E Gadinsky,Craig E Klinger,David L Helfet,Dean G Lorich,David S Wellman
{"title":"在固定良好的股骨干附近使用水泥套螺钉固定髋关节周围假体骨折可能不会影响短期的股骨干存活。","authors":"James Shaw,Ruby Patel,Peter K Sculco,Joshua Wright-Chisem,Naomi E Gadinsky,Craig E Klinger,David L Helfet,Dean G Lorich,David S Wellman","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.00920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nVancouver Type-B1 and C periprosthetic hip fractures have traditionally been treated using single- or double-plate fixation constructs. Concern exists regarding screws within the cement mantle due to the theoretical risk of cement fracture and eventual prosthetic loosening. The aim of this study was to assess femoral stem survivorship in patients with Vancouver Type-B1 or C fractures around a well-fixed cemented femoral component who were treated with a plate construct and screws into the cement mantle. The hypothesis was that screw fixation into the cement mantle would not compromise stem fixation.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA retrospective review was performed of patients who were consecutively, surgically treated for a periprosthetic fracture around a femoral stem by 3 surgeons, as identified through a search of records from January 1, 2007, to January 1, 2023. A total of 112 consecutive patients with Vancouver Type-B1 or C periprosthetic femoral fractures treated at our institutions were reviewed. Patients who underwent fixation using plate constructs with ≥1 screw within the cement mantle around the stem were included. Patients were followed until union, revision due to plate construct failure, or stem revision. Other complications, including alignment loss, cemented stem subsidence, radiographic stem loosening, and new cement-mantle fractures, were assessed.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nTwenty-eight patients (19 female; 27 White or Caucasian; 3 Hispanic or Latino; mean age, 81.4 ± 8.7 years) met the inclusion criteria. Radiographic union was achieved in 26 patients (92.9%). The study included 8 (28.6%) interprosthetic fractures between a total hip arthroplasty prosthesis and a total knee arthroplasty prosthesis. The mean union time was 8.0 ± 4.6 months (range, 2.2 to 25.6 weeks). The mean follow-up duration following the index procedure was 33.3 ± 24.0 months (range, 6.1 to 86.2 months). Two nonunions occurred (7.1%), both involving plate failure. Both patients required revision of the femoral prosthesis, which was not loose at the time of reoperation. No stem subsidence or cement mantle fractures occurred during follow-up, and no revisions were performed for stem loosening.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nScrew fixation into cement around a well-fixed stem did not contribute to stem loosening at short-term follow-up. There were no isolated femoral component revisions for cement mantle issues.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nTherapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cement Mantle Screws in Periprosthetic Hip Fracture Fixation Near Well-Fixed Femoral Stems May Not Impact Short-Term Femoral Stem Survivorship.\",\"authors\":\"James Shaw,Ruby Patel,Peter K Sculco,Joshua Wright-Chisem,Naomi E Gadinsky,Craig E Klinger,David L Helfet,Dean G Lorich,David S Wellman\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/jbjs.24.00920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nVancouver Type-B1 and C periprosthetic hip fractures have traditionally been treated using single- or double-plate fixation constructs. Concern exists regarding screws within the cement mantle due to the theoretical risk of cement fracture and eventual prosthetic loosening. The aim of this study was to assess femoral stem survivorship in patients with Vancouver Type-B1 or C fractures around a well-fixed cemented femoral component who were treated with a plate construct and screws into the cement mantle. The hypothesis was that screw fixation into the cement mantle would not compromise stem fixation.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nA retrospective review was performed of patients who were consecutively, surgically treated for a periprosthetic fracture around a femoral stem by 3 surgeons, as identified through a search of records from January 1, 2007, to January 1, 2023. A total of 112 consecutive patients with Vancouver Type-B1 or C periprosthetic femoral fractures treated at our institutions were reviewed. Patients who underwent fixation using plate constructs with ≥1 screw within the cement mantle around the stem were included. Patients were followed until union, revision due to plate construct failure, or stem revision. Other complications, including alignment loss, cemented stem subsidence, radiographic stem loosening, and new cement-mantle fractures, were assessed.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nTwenty-eight patients (19 female; 27 White or Caucasian; 3 Hispanic or Latino; mean age, 81.4 ± 8.7 years) met the inclusion criteria. Radiographic union was achieved in 26 patients (92.9%). The study included 8 (28.6%) interprosthetic fractures between a total hip arthroplasty prosthesis and a total knee arthroplasty prosthesis. The mean union time was 8.0 ± 4.6 months (range, 2.2 to 25.6 weeks). The mean follow-up duration following the index procedure was 33.3 ± 24.0 months (range, 6.1 to 86.2 months). Two nonunions occurred (7.1%), both involving plate failure. Both patients required revision of the femoral prosthesis, which was not loose at the time of reoperation. No stem subsidence or cement mantle fractures occurred during follow-up, and no revisions were performed for stem loosening.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nScrew fixation into cement around a well-fixed stem did not contribute to stem loosening at short-term follow-up. There were no isolated femoral component revisions for cement mantle issues.\\r\\n\\r\\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\\r\\nTherapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.00920\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.00920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

dvancouver b1型和C型髋关节假体周围骨折传统上使用单或双钢板固定装置治疗。由于理论上存在水泥骨折和最终假体松动的风险,人们对水泥套内的螺钉存在担忧。本研究的目的是评估温哥华b1型或C型骨折患者在固定良好的骨水泥股骨假体周围使用钢板和螺钉治疗的股骨干存活情况。假设螺钉固定在骨水泥套内不会影响骨干的固定。方法回顾性分析2007年1月1日至2023年1月1日期间连续接受3位外科医生手术治疗的股骨干假体周围骨折患者。我们对112例温哥华b1型或C型股骨假体周围骨折患者进行了回顾性分析。包括在骨干周围的水泥套内使用钢板固定≥1颗螺钉的患者。随访患者直至愈合、因钢板结构失败而进行翻修或骨干翻修。评估了其他并发症,包括对准丢失、骨水泥杆下沉、x线照相杆松动和新的骨水泥-地幔骨折。结果28例患者中,女性19例;27名白人或白种人;3西班牙裔或拉丁裔;平均年龄(81.4±8.7岁)符合纳入标准。26例(92.9%)患者放射学愈合。该研究包括8例(28.6%)全髋关节置换术和全膝关节置换术之间的假体间骨折。平均愈合时间8.0±4.6个月(2.2 ~ 25.6周)。术后平均随访时间为33.3±24.0个月(6.1 ~ 86.2个月)。发生2例骨不连(7.1%),均涉及钢板断裂。两例患者都需要翻修股骨假体,再次手术时股骨假体不松动。在随访期间,没有发生管柱下沉或水泥地幔破裂,也没有对管柱松动进行翻修。结论在短期随访中,将螺钉固定在固定良好的椎体周围不会导致椎体松动。对于水泥套问题,没有单独的股骨假体翻修。证据级别:治疗性IV级。参见《作者说明》获得证据级别的完整描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cement Mantle Screws in Periprosthetic Hip Fracture Fixation Near Well-Fixed Femoral Stems May Not Impact Short-Term Femoral Stem Survivorship.
BACKGROUND Vancouver Type-B1 and C periprosthetic hip fractures have traditionally been treated using single- or double-plate fixation constructs. Concern exists regarding screws within the cement mantle due to the theoretical risk of cement fracture and eventual prosthetic loosening. The aim of this study was to assess femoral stem survivorship in patients with Vancouver Type-B1 or C fractures around a well-fixed cemented femoral component who were treated with a plate construct and screws into the cement mantle. The hypothesis was that screw fixation into the cement mantle would not compromise stem fixation. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of patients who were consecutively, surgically treated for a periprosthetic fracture around a femoral stem by 3 surgeons, as identified through a search of records from January 1, 2007, to January 1, 2023. A total of 112 consecutive patients with Vancouver Type-B1 or C periprosthetic femoral fractures treated at our institutions were reviewed. Patients who underwent fixation using plate constructs with ≥1 screw within the cement mantle around the stem were included. Patients were followed until union, revision due to plate construct failure, or stem revision. Other complications, including alignment loss, cemented stem subsidence, radiographic stem loosening, and new cement-mantle fractures, were assessed. RESULTS Twenty-eight patients (19 female; 27 White or Caucasian; 3 Hispanic or Latino; mean age, 81.4 ± 8.7 years) met the inclusion criteria. Radiographic union was achieved in 26 patients (92.9%). The study included 8 (28.6%) interprosthetic fractures between a total hip arthroplasty prosthesis and a total knee arthroplasty prosthesis. The mean union time was 8.0 ± 4.6 months (range, 2.2 to 25.6 weeks). The mean follow-up duration following the index procedure was 33.3 ± 24.0 months (range, 6.1 to 86.2 months). Two nonunions occurred (7.1%), both involving plate failure. Both patients required revision of the femoral prosthesis, which was not loose at the time of reoperation. No stem subsidence or cement mantle fractures occurred during follow-up, and no revisions were performed for stem loosening. CONCLUSIONS Screw fixation into cement around a well-fixed stem did not contribute to stem loosening at short-term follow-up. There were no isolated femoral component revisions for cement mantle issues. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信