门诊手术的结果。

IF 2.1
Conrad S Myler, Robert Kerris, Niraja Rajan
{"title":"门诊手术的结果。","authors":"Conrad S Myler, Robert Kerris, Niraja Rajan","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review examines current economic and patient safety outcomes in ambulatory surgery. With the anticipated explosive growth of procedures performed in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and office-based settings, this review is timely and relevant.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Ambulatory surgery volume continues to grow consistently, with 19.2 million ambulatory surgeries performed in US community hospitals in 2018. It is projected that between 2024 and 2034, ASC volume will rise 21% to 44 million procedures annually. The cost of performing the same procedure at an ASC or office-based setting is significantly lower compared to hospital outpatient departments with no difference in patient safety outcomes. Our profession is in the early stages of developing machine learning models, which will allow us to develop case-specific selection criteria and improve our ability to identify which patients can safely undergo more complex surgeries at ASCs.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>As the complexity and diversity of patients, procedures, and facilities increase, it is increasingly evident that our prior universal selection criteria will need to be replaced with more nuanced criteria. It remains to be determined how the introduction of other technologies, such as outpatient wearable devices and remote monitoring, will impact the patient or procedural complexity that can be safely accommodated. Patient-reported outcome measures allow identification of minor adverse events, which are more common in the ambulatory setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":520600,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes in ambulatory surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Conrad S Myler, Robert Kerris, Niraja Rajan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review examines current economic and patient safety outcomes in ambulatory surgery. With the anticipated explosive growth of procedures performed in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and office-based settings, this review is timely and relevant.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Ambulatory surgery volume continues to grow consistently, with 19.2 million ambulatory surgeries performed in US community hospitals in 2018. It is projected that between 2024 and 2034, ASC volume will rise 21% to 44 million procedures annually. The cost of performing the same procedure at an ASC or office-based setting is significantly lower compared to hospital outpatient departments with no difference in patient safety outcomes. Our profession is in the early stages of developing machine learning models, which will allow us to develop case-specific selection criteria and improve our ability to identify which patients can safely undergo more complex surgeries at ASCs.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>As the complexity and diversity of patients, procedures, and facilities increase, it is increasingly evident that our prior universal selection criteria will need to be replaced with more nuanced criteria. It remains to be determined how the introduction of other technologies, such as outpatient wearable devices and remote monitoring, will impact the patient or procedural complexity that can be safely accommodated. Patient-reported outcome measures allow identification of minor adverse events, which are more common in the ambulatory setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001554\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:本综述探讨了目前门诊手术的经济和患者安全结果。随着预计在门诊手术中心(ASCs)和办公室进行的手术的爆炸性增长,本综述是及时和相关的。近期发现:门诊手术数量持续增长,2018年美国社区医院进行了1920万例门诊手术。预计在2024年至2034年间,ASC数量将增长21%,达到每年4400万例。与医院门诊部相比,在ASC或办公室进行相同手术的成本明显较低,患者安全结果没有差异。我们的专业正处于开发机器学习模型的早期阶段,这将使我们能够制定针对具体病例的选择标准,并提高我们确定哪些患者可以在ASCs安全接受更复杂手术的能力。摘要:随着患者、手术和设施的复杂性和多样性的增加,越来越明显的是,我们之前的通用选择标准将需要被更细致入微的标准所取代。引入其他技术,如门诊可穿戴设备和远程监控,将如何影响患者或可安全适应的程序复杂性,仍有待确定。患者报告的结果测量可以识别轻微的不良事件,这在门诊环境中更常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes in ambulatory surgery.

Purpose of review: This review examines current economic and patient safety outcomes in ambulatory surgery. With the anticipated explosive growth of procedures performed in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and office-based settings, this review is timely and relevant.

Recent findings: Ambulatory surgery volume continues to grow consistently, with 19.2 million ambulatory surgeries performed in US community hospitals in 2018. It is projected that between 2024 and 2034, ASC volume will rise 21% to 44 million procedures annually. The cost of performing the same procedure at an ASC or office-based setting is significantly lower compared to hospital outpatient departments with no difference in patient safety outcomes. Our profession is in the early stages of developing machine learning models, which will allow us to develop case-specific selection criteria and improve our ability to identify which patients can safely undergo more complex surgeries at ASCs.

Summary: As the complexity and diversity of patients, procedures, and facilities increase, it is increasingly evident that our prior universal selection criteria will need to be replaced with more nuanced criteria. It remains to be determined how the introduction of other technologies, such as outpatient wearable devices and remote monitoring, will impact the patient or procedural complexity that can be safely accommodated. Patient-reported outcome measures allow identification of minor adverse events, which are more common in the ambulatory setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信