基于US-CT实时三维融合的半自动穿刺机器人系统:临床评价。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Masayuki Nakayama, Bo Zhang, Ryoko Kuromatsu, Masahito Nakano, Yu Noda, Takumi Kawaguchi, Qiang Li, Yuji Maekawa, Masakatsu G Fujie, Shigeki Sugano
{"title":"基于US-CT实时三维融合的半自动穿刺机器人系统:临床评价。","authors":"Masayuki Nakayama, Bo Zhang, Ryoko Kuromatsu, Masahito Nakano, Yu Noda, Takumi Kawaguchi, Qiang Li, Yuji Maekawa, Masakatsu G Fujie, Shigeki Sugano","doi":"10.1007/s11548-025-03489-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Conventional systems supporting percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) have faced difficulties in ensuring safe and accurate puncture due to issues inherent to the medical images used and organ displacement caused by patients' respiration. To address this problem, this study proposes a semi-automatic puncture robot system that integrates real-time ultrasound (US) images with computed tomography (CT) images. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the system's usefulness through a pilot clinical experiment involving participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the clinical experiment using the proposed system, an improved U-net model based on fivefold cross-validation was constructed. Following the workflow of the proposed system, the model was trained using US images acquired from patients with robotic arms. The average Dice coefficient for the entire validation dataset was confirmed to be 0.87. Therefore, the model was implemented in the robotic system and applied to clinical experiment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A clinical experiment was conducted using the robotic system equipped with the developed AI model on five adult male and female participants. The centroid distances between the point clouds from each modality were evaluated in the 3D US-CT fusion process, assuming the blood vessel centerline represents the overall structural position. The results of the centroid distances showed a minimum value of 0.38 mm, a maximum value of 4.81 mm, and an average of 1.97 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the five participants had different CP classifications and the derived US images exhibited individual variability, all centroid distances satisfied the ablation margin of 5.00 mm considered in PRFA, suggesting the potential accuracy and utility of the robotic system for puncture navigation. Additionally, the results suggested the potential generalization performance of the AI model trained with data acquired according to the robotic system's workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":51251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1817-1827"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-time 3D US-CT fusion-based semi-automatic puncture robot system: clinical evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Masayuki Nakayama, Bo Zhang, Ryoko Kuromatsu, Masahito Nakano, Yu Noda, Takumi Kawaguchi, Qiang Li, Yuji Maekawa, Masakatsu G Fujie, Shigeki Sugano\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11548-025-03489-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Conventional systems supporting percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) have faced difficulties in ensuring safe and accurate puncture due to issues inherent to the medical images used and organ displacement caused by patients' respiration. To address this problem, this study proposes a semi-automatic puncture robot system that integrates real-time ultrasound (US) images with computed tomography (CT) images. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the system's usefulness through a pilot clinical experiment involving participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the clinical experiment using the proposed system, an improved U-net model based on fivefold cross-validation was constructed. Following the workflow of the proposed system, the model was trained using US images acquired from patients with robotic arms. The average Dice coefficient for the entire validation dataset was confirmed to be 0.87. Therefore, the model was implemented in the robotic system and applied to clinical experiment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A clinical experiment was conducted using the robotic system equipped with the developed AI model on five adult male and female participants. The centroid distances between the point clouds from each modality were evaluated in the 3D US-CT fusion process, assuming the blood vessel centerline represents the overall structural position. The results of the centroid distances showed a minimum value of 0.38 mm, a maximum value of 4.81 mm, and an average of 1.97 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the five participants had different CP classifications and the derived US images exhibited individual variability, all centroid distances satisfied the ablation margin of 5.00 mm considered in PRFA, suggesting the potential accuracy and utility of the robotic system for puncture navigation. Additionally, the results suggested the potential generalization performance of the AI model trained with data acquired according to the robotic system's workflow.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1817-1827\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476430/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03489-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03489-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于所使用的医学图像固有的问题和患者呼吸引起的器官移位,传统的支持经皮射频消融(PRFA)的系统在确保安全和准确穿刺方面面临困难。为了解决这个问题,本研究提出了一种半自动穿刺机器人系统,该系统集成了实时超声(US)图像和计算机断层扫描(CT)图像。本文的目的是通过一个涉及参与者的试点临床实验来评估该系统的有用性。方法:对该系统进行临床实验,构建基于五重交叉验证的改进U-net模型。根据所提出系统的工作流程,使用从具有机械臂的患者那里获得的美国图像对模型进行训练。整个验证数据集的平均Dice系数确认为0.87。因此,该模型在机器人系统中实现,并应用于临床实验。结果:利用装配了所开发的人工智能模型的机器人系统对5名成年男女进行了临床实验。在3D US-CT融合过程中,假设血管中心线代表整体结构位置,评估每个模态点云之间的质心距离。质心距离最小值为0.38 mm,最大值为4.81 mm,平均为1.97 mm。结论:尽管5名参与者的CP分类不同,且衍生的US图像存在个体差异,但所有质心距离都满足PRFA考虑的5.00 mm的消融范围,这表明机器人系统在穿刺导航方面具有潜在的准确性和实用性。此外,研究结果表明,根据机器人系统的工作流程获取的数据训练的人工智能模型具有潜在的泛化性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-time 3D US-CT fusion-based semi-automatic puncture robot system: clinical evaluation.

Purpose: Conventional systems supporting percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) have faced difficulties in ensuring safe and accurate puncture due to issues inherent to the medical images used and organ displacement caused by patients' respiration. To address this problem, this study proposes a semi-automatic puncture robot system that integrates real-time ultrasound (US) images with computed tomography (CT) images. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the system's usefulness through a pilot clinical experiment involving participants.

Methods: For the clinical experiment using the proposed system, an improved U-net model based on fivefold cross-validation was constructed. Following the workflow of the proposed system, the model was trained using US images acquired from patients with robotic arms. The average Dice coefficient for the entire validation dataset was confirmed to be 0.87. Therefore, the model was implemented in the robotic system and applied to clinical experiment.

Results: A clinical experiment was conducted using the robotic system equipped with the developed AI model on five adult male and female participants. The centroid distances between the point clouds from each modality were evaluated in the 3D US-CT fusion process, assuming the blood vessel centerline represents the overall structural position. The results of the centroid distances showed a minimum value of 0.38 mm, a maximum value of 4.81 mm, and an average of 1.97 mm.

Conclusion: Although the five participants had different CP classifications and the derived US images exhibited individual variability, all centroid distances satisfied the ablation margin of 5.00 mm considered in PRFA, suggesting the potential accuracy and utility of the robotic system for puncture navigation. Additionally, the results suggested the potential generalization performance of the AI model trained with data acquired according to the robotic system's workflow.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (IJCARS) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a platform for closing the gap between medical and technical disciplines, and encourages interdisciplinary research and development activities in an international environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信