12个月和15个月自闭症筛查工具的比较。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Katelynn S Porto, Andrea Trubanova Wieckowski, Deborah A Fein, Marianne L Barton, Grace T Baranek, Diana L Robins
{"title":"12个月和15个月自闭症筛查工具的比较。","authors":"Katelynn S Porto, Andrea Trubanova Wieckowski, Deborah A Fein, Marianne L Barton, Grace T Baranek, Diana L Robins","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the performance of autism screeners at 12 and 15 months of age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children were screened either at 12- (n = 1473) or 15-month (n = 1227) primary care visits. Children were screened with both the Infant/Toddler Checklist (ITC) and the First Year Inventory-Lite (FYI-L) at 12 months and FYI-L and the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F) at 15 months. After a positive screen and/or clinical concern, families were offered a no-cost diagnostic evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1473 toddlers screened at 12 months, 223 screened positive and 107 attended a diagnostic evaluation. Of the 1227 children screened at 15 months, 252 screened positive and 94 attended the evaluation. Overall, specificity for autism was high (>0.94) for all screeners at 12 and 15 months. At 12-month screening, sensitivity for autism was low on the ITC (0.26) and moderate on the FYI-L (0.67). Positive predictive value (PPV) was low for both screeners (0.24 for ITC and FYI-L). At 15 months, both the FYI-L and the M-CHAT-R/F demonstrated moderate sensitivity (0.61 for FYI-L and 0.60 for the M-CHAT-R/F) and low PPV (0.16 for FYI-L and 0.31 for M-CHAT-R/F).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although data do not support universal screening at younger ages, the study identifies tools that can be used at 12 and 15 months. Importantly, screening at these ages does not identify all cases of autism, and repeat screening at 18 months and beyond is essential to support autism detection as early as possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Available Tools to Screen for Autism at 12 and 15 Months.\",\"authors\":\"Katelynn S Porto, Andrea Trubanova Wieckowski, Deborah A Fein, Marianne L Barton, Grace T Baranek, Diana L Robins\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the performance of autism screeners at 12 and 15 months of age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children were screened either at 12- (n = 1473) or 15-month (n = 1227) primary care visits. Children were screened with both the Infant/Toddler Checklist (ITC) and the First Year Inventory-Lite (FYI-L) at 12 months and FYI-L and the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F) at 15 months. After a positive screen and/or clinical concern, families were offered a no-cost diagnostic evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1473 toddlers screened at 12 months, 223 screened positive and 107 attended a diagnostic evaluation. Of the 1227 children screened at 15 months, 252 screened positive and 94 attended the evaluation. Overall, specificity for autism was high (>0.94) for all screeners at 12 and 15 months. At 12-month screening, sensitivity for autism was low on the ITC (0.26) and moderate on the FYI-L (0.67). Positive predictive value (PPV) was low for both screeners (0.24 for ITC and FYI-L). At 15 months, both the FYI-L and the M-CHAT-R/F demonstrated moderate sensitivity (0.61 for FYI-L and 0.60 for the M-CHAT-R/F) and low PPV (0.16 for FYI-L and 0.31 for M-CHAT-R/F).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although data do not support universal screening at younger ages, the study identifies tools that can be used at 12 and 15 months. Importantly, screening at these ages does not identify all cases of autism, and repeat screening at 18 months and beyond is essential to support autism detection as early as possible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001406\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001406","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解12个月和15个月大的自闭症筛查者的表现。方法:在12个月(n = 1473)或15个月(n = 1227)就诊时对儿童进行筛查。儿童在12个月时使用婴儿/幼儿检查表(ITC)和第一年生活量表(FYI-L)进行筛查,在15个月时使用FYI-L和修订的幼儿自闭症检查表(M-CHAT-R/F)进行筛查。在筛查呈阳性和/或临床关注后,家庭会被提供免费的诊断评估。结果:在1473名12月龄幼儿中,223名筛查阳性,107名参加了诊断评估。在15个月时接受筛查的1227名儿童中,252名筛查呈阳性,94名参加了评估。总的来说,在12个月和15个月时,所有筛查者对自闭症的特异性都很高(>.94)。在12个月的筛查中,ITC对自闭症的敏感性较低(0.26),FYI-L为中等(0.67)。两种筛选器的阳性预测值(PPV)均较低(ITC和FYI-L为0.24)。在15个月时,FYI-L和M-CHAT-R/F均表现出中等敏感性(FYI-L为0.61,M-CHAT-R/F为0.60)和低PPV (FYI-L为0.16,M-CHAT-R/F为0.31)。结论:虽然数据不支持在更小的年龄进行普遍筛查,但研究确定了可以在12个月和15个月时使用的工具。重要的是,在这些年龄段进行筛查并不能确定所有自闭症病例,在18个月及以后进行重复筛查对于尽早发现自闭症至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Available Tools to Screen for Autism at 12 and 15 Months.

Objective: To determine the performance of autism screeners at 12 and 15 months of age.

Methods: Children were screened either at 12- (n = 1473) or 15-month (n = 1227) primary care visits. Children were screened with both the Infant/Toddler Checklist (ITC) and the First Year Inventory-Lite (FYI-L) at 12 months and FYI-L and the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F) at 15 months. After a positive screen and/or clinical concern, families were offered a no-cost diagnostic evaluation.

Results: Of the 1473 toddlers screened at 12 months, 223 screened positive and 107 attended a diagnostic evaluation. Of the 1227 children screened at 15 months, 252 screened positive and 94 attended the evaluation. Overall, specificity for autism was high (>0.94) for all screeners at 12 and 15 months. At 12-month screening, sensitivity for autism was low on the ITC (0.26) and moderate on the FYI-L (0.67). Positive predictive value (PPV) was low for both screeners (0.24 for ITC and FYI-L). At 15 months, both the FYI-L and the M-CHAT-R/F demonstrated moderate sensitivity (0.61 for FYI-L and 0.60 for the M-CHAT-R/F) and low PPV (0.16 for FYI-L and 0.31 for M-CHAT-R/F).

Conclusion: Although data do not support universal screening at younger ages, the study identifies tools that can be used at 12 and 15 months. Importantly, screening at these ages does not identify all cases of autism, and repeat screening at 18 months and beyond is essential to support autism detection as early as possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
155
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (JDBP) is a leading resource for clinicians, teachers, and researchers involved in pediatric healthcare and child development. This important journal covers some of the most challenging issues affecting child development and behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信