探索监督机器学习模型,利用光容积脉搏图(PPG)及其衍生物的非基准特征来估计血压。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Erick Javier Argüello-Prada, Carlos David Castaño Mosquera
{"title":"探索监督机器学习模型,利用光容积脉搏图(PPG)及其衍生物的非基准特征来估计血压。","authors":"Erick Javier Argüello-Prada, Carlos David Castaño Mosquera","doi":"10.1007/s13246-025-01593-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Machine learning has proven valuable in developing photoplethysmography (PPG)-based approaches for blood pressure (BP) estimation, with many holding some promise for cuff-less BP assessment. Still, their efficacy relies on accurate and robust fiducial point detection algorithms. The present study explores the usefulness of several non-fiducial features of the PPG signal and its derivatives in estimating BP by combining well-known feature selection methods and machine learning techniques. We collected PPG recordings from 56 participants and computed fifty-seven non-fiducial features, including statistical indexes and energy operators. After implementing three feature selection algorithms (i.e., F-test, mRMR, and ReliefF), the most relevant features were employed to train four learning regression model families. We computed the mean of all absolute errors (MAE), the squared sum and the standard deviation of the errors (MSE and RMSE, respectively), and the coefficient of determination (r<sup>2</sup>) to evaluate the performance of each model. The abovementioned feature selection methods produced different optimal feature subsets for systolic and diastolic BP values, with the Matern 5/2 and the rational quadratic GPR models providing the best predictions when combined with ReliefF (MAE = 0.44, MSE = 0.61, and RMSE = 0.78 mmHg for SBP; MAE = 0.31, MSE = 0.40, and RMSE = 0.63 mmHg for DBP). Furthermore, each model utilizes only fifteen easy-to-compute features, thus becoming suitable for computationally constrained hardware. We highlight the need for implementing feature selection algorithms exhaustively, as the most relevant PPG-based features for systolic and diastolic BP estimation might not have the same weight.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1399-1414"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring supervised machine learning models to estimate blood pressure using non-fiducial features of the photoplethysmogram (PPG) and its derivatives.\",\"authors\":\"Erick Javier Argüello-Prada, Carlos David Castaño Mosquera\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13246-025-01593-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Machine learning has proven valuable in developing photoplethysmography (PPG)-based approaches for blood pressure (BP) estimation, with many holding some promise for cuff-less BP assessment. Still, their efficacy relies on accurate and robust fiducial point detection algorithms. The present study explores the usefulness of several non-fiducial features of the PPG signal and its derivatives in estimating BP by combining well-known feature selection methods and machine learning techniques. We collected PPG recordings from 56 participants and computed fifty-seven non-fiducial features, including statistical indexes and energy operators. After implementing three feature selection algorithms (i.e., F-test, mRMR, and ReliefF), the most relevant features were employed to train four learning regression model families. We computed the mean of all absolute errors (MAE), the squared sum and the standard deviation of the errors (MSE and RMSE, respectively), and the coefficient of determination (r<sup>2</sup>) to evaluate the performance of each model. The abovementioned feature selection methods produced different optimal feature subsets for systolic and diastolic BP values, with the Matern 5/2 and the rational quadratic GPR models providing the best predictions when combined with ReliefF (MAE = 0.44, MSE = 0.61, and RMSE = 0.78 mmHg for SBP; MAE = 0.31, MSE = 0.40, and RMSE = 0.63 mmHg for DBP). Furthermore, each model utilizes only fifteen easy-to-compute features, thus becoming suitable for computationally constrained hardware. We highlight the need for implementing feature selection algorithms exhaustively, as the most relevant PPG-based features for systolic and diastolic BP estimation might not have the same weight.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1399-1414\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-025-01593-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-025-01593-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器学习在开发基于光容积脉搏波(PPG)的血压(BP)估计方法方面已被证明是有价值的,其中许多方法有望实现无袖带血压评估。然而,它们的有效性依赖于精确和鲁棒的基点检测算法。本研究通过结合已知的特征选择方法和机器学习技术,探讨了PPG信号及其导数的几个非基准特征在估计BP中的有用性。我们收集了56名参与者的PPG记录,并计算了57个非基准特征,包括统计指标和能量算子。在实现三种特征选择算法(即F-test、mRMR和ReliefF)后,利用最相关的特征训练四个学习回归模型族。我们计算了所有绝对误差的平均值(MAE)、误差的平方和和标准差(分别为MSE和RMSE)以及决定系数(r2)来评估每个模型的性能。上述特征选择方法对收缩压和舒张压值产生了不同的最优特征子集,其中Matern 5/2和有理二次GPR模型与ReliefF联合预测收缩压效果最佳(MAE = 0.44, MSE = 0.61, RMSE = 0.78 mmHg);MAE = 0.31, MSE = 0.40, RMSE = 0.63 mmHg (DBP)。此外,每个模型只利用了15个易于计算的特征,因此适合计算受限的硬件。我们强调需要详尽地实现特征选择算法,因为最相关的基于ppg的收缩压和舒张压估计特征可能具有不同的权重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring supervised machine learning models to estimate blood pressure using non-fiducial features of the photoplethysmogram (PPG) and its derivatives.

Machine learning has proven valuable in developing photoplethysmography (PPG)-based approaches for blood pressure (BP) estimation, with many holding some promise for cuff-less BP assessment. Still, their efficacy relies on accurate and robust fiducial point detection algorithms. The present study explores the usefulness of several non-fiducial features of the PPG signal and its derivatives in estimating BP by combining well-known feature selection methods and machine learning techniques. We collected PPG recordings from 56 participants and computed fifty-seven non-fiducial features, including statistical indexes and energy operators. After implementing three feature selection algorithms (i.e., F-test, mRMR, and ReliefF), the most relevant features were employed to train four learning regression model families. We computed the mean of all absolute errors (MAE), the squared sum and the standard deviation of the errors (MSE and RMSE, respectively), and the coefficient of determination (r2) to evaluate the performance of each model. The abovementioned feature selection methods produced different optimal feature subsets for systolic and diastolic BP values, with the Matern 5/2 and the rational quadratic GPR models providing the best predictions when combined with ReliefF (MAE = 0.44, MSE = 0.61, and RMSE = 0.78 mmHg for SBP; MAE = 0.31, MSE = 0.40, and RMSE = 0.63 mmHg for DBP). Furthermore, each model utilizes only fifteen easy-to-compute features, thus becoming suitable for computationally constrained hardware. We highlight the need for implementing feature selection algorithms exhaustively, as the most relevant PPG-based features for systolic and diastolic BP estimation might not have the same weight.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信