塑造加拿大初级保健的未来:实习生对卫生系统转型研究中患者和公众参与的见解。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Ashley Chisholm, Meghan Gilfoyle, Maggie MacNeil, Carolyn Melro
{"title":"塑造加拿大初级保健的未来:实习生对卫生系统转型研究中患者和公众参与的见解。","authors":"Ashley Chisholm, Meghan Gilfoyle, Maggie MacNeil, Carolyn Melro","doi":"10.1186/s12961-025-01366-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Access to healthcare in Canada remains a significant issue, with over one in five people lacking attachment to a regular primary care provider. To address this, patients, health professionals, researchers and policymakers are advocating for health system transformation aimed at improving access and achieving the quintuple aim. As a result, research funding increasingly prioritizes health system transformation. However, whilst collaborative approaches such as integrated knowledge translation (IKT) are critical for success, trainees face barriers to integrating patient and public engagement into their research. These challenges include limited time and resources, difficulties in developing meaningful partnerships, tensions between independent intellectual contributions and collaborative research and academic structures that reinforce power imbalances. This commentary presents four trainee experiences that demonstrate successful capacity-building initiatives for trainees to embed patient and public engagement in health system transformation research. The first case study focusses on the Patient Expertise in Research Collaboration (PERC), which supports Transdisciplinary Understanding and Training on Research-Primary Health Care (TUTOR-PHC) trainees in incorporating patient perspectives into primary healthcare research. The second highlights the role of the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network (IKTRN) in building trainee capacity through funding. The third explores a trainee experience with the ACCESS Open Minds Network (AOM). The fourth describes a trainee experience within a co-design study, the Enhancing Physical and Community MoBility in OLDEr Adults with Health Inequities Using CommuNity Co-Design (EMBOLDEN). These case studies provide insights into effective strategies for overcoming barriers to patient and public engagement in research. However, opportunities for such engagement remain uneven and depend on limited funding. To foster sustainable support, academic institutions must integrate these capacity-building initiatives, promoting a future of primary care in Canada that is inclusive, patient-centred and responsive to evolving population needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"98"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shaping the future of primary care in Canada: trainee insights on patient and public engagement in health system transformation research.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Chisholm, Meghan Gilfoyle, Maggie MacNeil, Carolyn Melro\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12961-025-01366-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Access to healthcare in Canada remains a significant issue, with over one in five people lacking attachment to a regular primary care provider. To address this, patients, health professionals, researchers and policymakers are advocating for health system transformation aimed at improving access and achieving the quintuple aim. As a result, research funding increasingly prioritizes health system transformation. However, whilst collaborative approaches such as integrated knowledge translation (IKT) are critical for success, trainees face barriers to integrating patient and public engagement into their research. These challenges include limited time and resources, difficulties in developing meaningful partnerships, tensions between independent intellectual contributions and collaborative research and academic structures that reinforce power imbalances. This commentary presents four trainee experiences that demonstrate successful capacity-building initiatives for trainees to embed patient and public engagement in health system transformation research. The first case study focusses on the Patient Expertise in Research Collaboration (PERC), which supports Transdisciplinary Understanding and Training on Research-Primary Health Care (TUTOR-PHC) trainees in incorporating patient perspectives into primary healthcare research. The second highlights the role of the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network (IKTRN) in building trainee capacity through funding. The third explores a trainee experience with the ACCESS Open Minds Network (AOM). The fourth describes a trainee experience within a co-design study, the Enhancing Physical and Community MoBility in OLDEr Adults with Health Inequities Using CommuNity Co-Design (EMBOLDEN). These case studies provide insights into effective strategies for overcoming barriers to patient and public engagement in research. However, opportunities for such engagement remain uneven and depend on limited funding. To foster sustainable support, academic institutions must integrate these capacity-building initiatives, promoting a future of primary care in Canada that is inclusive, patient-centred and responsive to evolving population needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323194/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01366-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01366-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在加拿大,获得医疗保健仍然是一个重大问题,超过五分之一的人缺乏对正规初级保健提供者的依赖。为解决这一问题,患者、卫生专业人员、研究人员和政策制定者正在倡导旨在改善获取和实现五项目标的卫生系统转型。因此,研究经费越来越优先考虑卫生系统转型。然而,尽管集成知识翻译(IKT)等协作方法对成功至关重要,但学员在将患者和公众参与纳入他们的研究方面面临障碍。这些挑战包括有限的时间和资源、发展有意义的伙伴关系的困难、独立知识贡献与合作研究之间的紧张关系以及加剧权力不平衡的学术结构。本评论介绍了四个学员的经验,这些经验证明了学员在将患者和公众参与纳入卫生系统转型研究方面的成功能力建设举措。第一个案例研究的重点是研究合作中的患者专业知识(PERC),它支持初级卫生保健研究的跨学科理解和培训(mentor - phc)学员将患者观点纳入初级卫生保健研究。第二部分强调了综合知识翻译研究网络(IKTRN)通过资助在培养学员能力方面的作用。第三篇文章探讨了ACCESS Open Minds Network (AOM)的实习经历。第四篇描述了一项共同设计研究中的实习经历,该研究名为“利用社区共同设计(EMBOLDEN)增强健康不平等老年人的身体和社区流动性”。这些案例研究为克服患者和公众参与研究的障碍提供了有效的策略见解。然而,这种参与的机会仍然不均衡,而且取决于有限的资金。为了促进可持续的支持,学术机构必须整合这些能力建设倡议,促进加拿大初级保健的未来,使其具有包容性、以患者为中心并对不断变化的人口需求作出反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shaping the future of primary care in Canada: trainee insights on patient and public engagement in health system transformation research.

Access to healthcare in Canada remains a significant issue, with over one in five people lacking attachment to a regular primary care provider. To address this, patients, health professionals, researchers and policymakers are advocating for health system transformation aimed at improving access and achieving the quintuple aim. As a result, research funding increasingly prioritizes health system transformation. However, whilst collaborative approaches such as integrated knowledge translation (IKT) are critical for success, trainees face barriers to integrating patient and public engagement into their research. These challenges include limited time and resources, difficulties in developing meaningful partnerships, tensions between independent intellectual contributions and collaborative research and academic structures that reinforce power imbalances. This commentary presents four trainee experiences that demonstrate successful capacity-building initiatives for trainees to embed patient and public engagement in health system transformation research. The first case study focusses on the Patient Expertise in Research Collaboration (PERC), which supports Transdisciplinary Understanding and Training on Research-Primary Health Care (TUTOR-PHC) trainees in incorporating patient perspectives into primary healthcare research. The second highlights the role of the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network (IKTRN) in building trainee capacity through funding. The third explores a trainee experience with the ACCESS Open Minds Network (AOM). The fourth describes a trainee experience within a co-design study, the Enhancing Physical and Community MoBility in OLDEr Adults with Health Inequities Using CommuNity Co-Design (EMBOLDEN). These case studies provide insights into effective strategies for overcoming barriers to patient and public engagement in research. However, opportunities for such engagement remain uneven and depend on limited funding. To foster sustainable support, academic institutions must integrate these capacity-building initiatives, promoting a future of primary care in Canada that is inclusive, patient-centred and responsive to evolving population needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信