控制点和呼吸困难:28730人的横断面分析。

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2025-08-04 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1183/23120541.00908-2024
Max Olsson, Jacob Sandberg, Slavica Kochovska, Anders Blomberg, Mats Börjesson, Gunnar Engström, Andrei Malinovschi, Magnus Sköld, Per Wollmer, Kjell Torén, Carl Johan Östgren, David C Currow, Magnus Ekström
{"title":"控制点和呼吸困难:28730人的横断面分析。","authors":"Max Olsson, Jacob Sandberg, Slavica Kochovska, Anders Blomberg, Mats Börjesson, Gunnar Engström, Andrei Malinovschi, Magnus Sköld, Per Wollmer, Kjell Torén, Carl Johan Östgren, David C Currow, Magnus Ekström","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00908-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term pathological breathlessness is a life-limiting symptom that risks taking control of the individual's life. We aimed to evaluate how locus of control (LOC), an individual's perceived control of present and past life events, relates to breathlessness in a middle-aged general population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based, cross-sectional analysis of people aged 50-64 years was conducted in the Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS). Breathlessness was measured using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) breathlessness scale. LOC was assessed using five-point scales related to work, life events, perceived future, treated by other people, past changes and life improvements. The LOC factors were dichotomised as having an external or internal LOC. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between external LOC and presence of moderate/severe breathlessness (mMRC ≥2). Associations between external LOC and higher breathlessness severity score (mMRC 0-4) were analysed using ordinal regression. The models were adjusted for age, sex, education level, pack-years of smoking, body mass index, lung function, depression and cardiorespiratory diseases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 28 730 participants (52% women), 4% experienced breathlessness. Breathlessness was related to external LOC in relation to life events (odds ratio (OR) 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-1.71), future (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.53-2.34), treated unfairly (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.42-2.09), past changes (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.30-1.74) and life improvements (OR 2.91, 95% CI 2.35-3.59). External LOC was associated with increased breathlessness severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>External LOC is associated with experiencing worse breathlessness, and the identified LOC factors can be considered in future intervention studies aiming to reduce the suffering from breathlessness.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Locus of control and breathlessness: a cross-sectional analysis of 28 730 people.\",\"authors\":\"Max Olsson, Jacob Sandberg, Slavica Kochovska, Anders Blomberg, Mats Börjesson, Gunnar Engström, Andrei Malinovschi, Magnus Sköld, Per Wollmer, Kjell Torén, Carl Johan Östgren, David C Currow, Magnus Ekström\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/23120541.00908-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term pathological breathlessness is a life-limiting symptom that risks taking control of the individual's life. We aimed to evaluate how locus of control (LOC), an individual's perceived control of present and past life events, relates to breathlessness in a middle-aged general population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based, cross-sectional analysis of people aged 50-64 years was conducted in the Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS). Breathlessness was measured using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) breathlessness scale. LOC was assessed using five-point scales related to work, life events, perceived future, treated by other people, past changes and life improvements. The LOC factors were dichotomised as having an external or internal LOC. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between external LOC and presence of moderate/severe breathlessness (mMRC ≥2). Associations between external LOC and higher breathlessness severity score (mMRC 0-4) were analysed using ordinal regression. The models were adjusted for age, sex, education level, pack-years of smoking, body mass index, lung function, depression and cardiorespiratory diseases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 28 730 participants (52% women), 4% experienced breathlessness. Breathlessness was related to external LOC in relation to life events (odds ratio (OR) 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-1.71), future (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.53-2.34), treated unfairly (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.42-2.09), past changes (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.30-1.74) and life improvements (OR 2.91, 95% CI 2.35-3.59). External LOC was associated with increased breathlessness severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>External LOC is associated with experiencing worse breathlessness, and the identified LOC factors can be considered in future intervention studies aiming to reduce the suffering from breathlessness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320106/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00908-2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00908-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:长期病理性呼吸困难是一种限制生命的症状,有可能控制个体的生命。我们的目的是评估控制点(LOC),一个人对现在和过去生活事件的感知控制,如何与中年一般人群的呼吸困难相关。方法:在瑞典心肺生物图像研究(SCAPIS)中对50-64岁的人群进行了基于人群的横断面分析。使用改良的医学研究委员会(mMRC)呼吸困难量表测量呼吸困难。LOC采用与工作、生活事件、感知未来、他人待遇、过去的变化和生活改善有关的五分制进行评估。LOC因素被分为外部LOC或内部LOC。采用Logistic回归检验外源性LOC与存在中度/重度呼吸困难(mMRC≥2)之间的关系。使用有序回归分析外部LOC与较高呼吸困难严重程度评分(mMRC 0-4)之间的关系。这些模型根据年龄、性别、受教育程度、吸烟包年数、体重指数、肺功能、抑郁和心肺疾病进行了调整。结果:28730名参与者(52%为女性)中,4%出现呼吸困难。呼吸困难与外部LOC相关的生活事件(优势比(OR) 1.47, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.26-1.71)、未来(OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.53-2.34)、不公平治疗(OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.42-2.09)、过去的变化(OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.30-1.74)和生活改善(OR 2.91, 95% CI 2.35-3.59)。外部LOC与呼吸困难严重程度增加有关。结论:外源性LOC与呼吸困难的加重有关,确定的LOC因素可在未来的干预研究中考虑,旨在减少呼吸困难的痛苦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Locus of control and breathlessness: a cross-sectional analysis of 28 730 people.

Locus of control and breathlessness: a cross-sectional analysis of 28 730 people.

Locus of control and breathlessness: a cross-sectional analysis of 28 730 people.

Locus of control and breathlessness: a cross-sectional analysis of 28 730 people.

Background: Long-term pathological breathlessness is a life-limiting symptom that risks taking control of the individual's life. We aimed to evaluate how locus of control (LOC), an individual's perceived control of present and past life events, relates to breathlessness in a middle-aged general population.

Methods: A population-based, cross-sectional analysis of people aged 50-64 years was conducted in the Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS). Breathlessness was measured using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) breathlessness scale. LOC was assessed using five-point scales related to work, life events, perceived future, treated by other people, past changes and life improvements. The LOC factors were dichotomised as having an external or internal LOC. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between external LOC and presence of moderate/severe breathlessness (mMRC ≥2). Associations between external LOC and higher breathlessness severity score (mMRC 0-4) were analysed using ordinal regression. The models were adjusted for age, sex, education level, pack-years of smoking, body mass index, lung function, depression and cardiorespiratory diseases.

Results: Of 28 730 participants (52% women), 4% experienced breathlessness. Breathlessness was related to external LOC in relation to life events (odds ratio (OR) 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-1.71), future (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.53-2.34), treated unfairly (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.42-2.09), past changes (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.30-1.74) and life improvements (OR 2.91, 95% CI 2.35-3.59). External LOC was associated with increased breathlessness severity.

Conclusion: External LOC is associated with experiencing worse breathlessness, and the identified LOC factors can be considered in future intervention studies aiming to reduce the suffering from breathlessness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信