慢性咳嗽的十大优先事项:加拿大詹姆斯·林德联盟优先确定伙伴关系(CAN-COUGH)。

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2025-08-04 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1183/23120541.01370-2024
Saif Samari, Ana Oliveira, Danica Brister, Elena Kum, Shawn D Aaron, Darryl Adamko, Anurag Bhalla, Christopher Carlsten, Maxime Cormier, Anne K Ellis, Stephen K Field, Krystelle Godbout, Paul Hernandez, Jeremy A Hirota, Alan Kaplan, Tom Kovesi, Renata Mancopes, Maria Sedeno, Maeve Smith, Robert Newman, Philip King, Tiffany Gallagher, Sarah Butson, Dina Brooks, Imran Satia
{"title":"慢性咳嗽的十大优先事项:加拿大詹姆斯·林德联盟优先确定伙伴关系(CAN-COUGH)。","authors":"Saif Samari, Ana Oliveira, Danica Brister, Elena Kum, Shawn D Aaron, Darryl Adamko, Anurag Bhalla, Christopher Carlsten, Maxime Cormier, Anne K Ellis, Stephen K Field, Krystelle Godbout, Paul Hernandez, Jeremy A Hirota, Alan Kaplan, Tom Kovesi, Renata Mancopes, Maria Sedeno, Maeve Smith, Robert Newman, Philip King, Tiffany Gallagher, Sarah Butson, Dina Brooks, Imran Satia","doi":"10.1183/23120541.01370-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic cough significantly impacts individuals' quality of life and poses challenges for healthcare providers due to limited licensed treatments, side effects of available medications and difficulty accessing nonpharmacological interventions. Understanding priorities for research, education and knowledge dissemination from the perspectives of individuals with chronic cough and healthcare providers can guide future efforts. This study aimed to identify these key priorities in Canada.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study using the James Lind Alliance (JLA) method to set priorities. Chronic cough was identified as the healthcare problem. Participants rated items related to research, education and knowledge dissemination in an online survey using a seven-point Likert scale. Results of the survey were reviewed by the Canadian Thoracic Society's (CTS) multidisciplinary working group and patient partners who engaged in a face-to-face Priority-Setting Partnership, to establish a \"Top 10\" priorities list for chronic cough.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>74 individuals with chronic cough and 62 healthcare providers completed the scoping survey. The top-rated priorities included enhancing knowledge of existing treatments, developing new treatments and improving diagnostic testing. The final \"Top 10\" priorities list emphasised the need for developing infrastructure for evaluating new treatments, improving understanding of biological mechanisms and raising awareness among the public and policymakers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first priority-setting project for chronic cough, highlighting key areas to address in research, education and dissemination. The identified priorities will serve as a foundation for future efforts to improve the management and care of individuals with chronic cough.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Top 10 priorities for chronic cough: Canadian James Lind Alliance Priority-Setting Partnership (CAN-COUGH).\",\"authors\":\"Saif Samari, Ana Oliveira, Danica Brister, Elena Kum, Shawn D Aaron, Darryl Adamko, Anurag Bhalla, Christopher Carlsten, Maxime Cormier, Anne K Ellis, Stephen K Field, Krystelle Godbout, Paul Hernandez, Jeremy A Hirota, Alan Kaplan, Tom Kovesi, Renata Mancopes, Maria Sedeno, Maeve Smith, Robert Newman, Philip King, Tiffany Gallagher, Sarah Butson, Dina Brooks, Imran Satia\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/23120541.01370-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic cough significantly impacts individuals' quality of life and poses challenges for healthcare providers due to limited licensed treatments, side effects of available medications and difficulty accessing nonpharmacological interventions. Understanding priorities for research, education and knowledge dissemination from the perspectives of individuals with chronic cough and healthcare providers can guide future efforts. This study aimed to identify these key priorities in Canada.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study using the James Lind Alliance (JLA) method to set priorities. Chronic cough was identified as the healthcare problem. Participants rated items related to research, education and knowledge dissemination in an online survey using a seven-point Likert scale. Results of the survey were reviewed by the Canadian Thoracic Society's (CTS) multidisciplinary working group and patient partners who engaged in a face-to-face Priority-Setting Partnership, to establish a \\\"Top 10\\\" priorities list for chronic cough.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>74 individuals with chronic cough and 62 healthcare providers completed the scoping survey. The top-rated priorities included enhancing knowledge of existing treatments, developing new treatments and improving diagnostic testing. The final \\\"Top 10\\\" priorities list emphasised the need for developing infrastructure for evaluating new treatments, improving understanding of biological mechanisms and raising awareness among the public and policymakers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first priority-setting project for chronic cough, highlighting key areas to address in research, education and dissemination. The identified priorities will serve as a foundation for future efforts to improve the management and care of individuals with chronic cough.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320103/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.01370-2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.01370-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性咳嗽显著影响个人的生活质量,由于有限的许可治疗,现有药物的副作用和难以获得非药物干预措施,给医疗保健提供者带来了挑战。从慢性咳嗽患者和医疗保健提供者的角度了解研究、教育和知识传播的重点,可以指导未来的工作。这项研究旨在确定加拿大的这些关键优先事项。研究设计和方法:我们采用詹姆斯·林德联盟(James Lind Alliance, JLA)的方法进行了一项横断面研究,以确定优先级。慢性咳嗽被确定为保健问题。参与者使用7分李克特量表对与研究、教育和知识传播相关的项目进行在线调查。调查结果由加拿大胸科学会(CTS)多学科工作组和患者合作伙伴进行了面对面的优先事项制定合作伙伴关系,以建立慢性咳嗽的“十大”优先事项清单。结果:74名慢性咳嗽患者和62名医护人员完成了范围调查。排名最高的优先事项包括提高对现有治疗方法的认识,开发新的治疗方法和改进诊断测试。最终的“十大”优先事项清单强调了发展基础设施以评估新疗法、改善对生物机制的理解以及提高公众和决策者的认识的必要性。结论:这是慢性咳嗽的第一个重点确定项目,突出了在研究、教育和传播方面需要解决的重点领域。确定的优先事项将为今后努力改善慢性咳嗽患者的管理和护理奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Top 10 priorities for chronic cough: Canadian James Lind Alliance Priority-Setting Partnership (CAN-COUGH).

Top 10 priorities for chronic cough: Canadian James Lind Alliance Priority-Setting Partnership (CAN-COUGH).

Top 10 priorities for chronic cough: Canadian James Lind Alliance Priority-Setting Partnership (CAN-COUGH).

Top 10 priorities for chronic cough: Canadian James Lind Alliance Priority-Setting Partnership (CAN-COUGH).

Background: Chronic cough significantly impacts individuals' quality of life and poses challenges for healthcare providers due to limited licensed treatments, side effects of available medications and difficulty accessing nonpharmacological interventions. Understanding priorities for research, education and knowledge dissemination from the perspectives of individuals with chronic cough and healthcare providers can guide future efforts. This study aimed to identify these key priorities in Canada.

Study design and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using the James Lind Alliance (JLA) method to set priorities. Chronic cough was identified as the healthcare problem. Participants rated items related to research, education and knowledge dissemination in an online survey using a seven-point Likert scale. Results of the survey were reviewed by the Canadian Thoracic Society's (CTS) multidisciplinary working group and patient partners who engaged in a face-to-face Priority-Setting Partnership, to establish a "Top 10" priorities list for chronic cough.

Results: 74 individuals with chronic cough and 62 healthcare providers completed the scoping survey. The top-rated priorities included enhancing knowledge of existing treatments, developing new treatments and improving diagnostic testing. The final "Top 10" priorities list emphasised the need for developing infrastructure for evaluating new treatments, improving understanding of biological mechanisms and raising awareness among the public and policymakers.

Conclusion: This is the first priority-setting project for chronic cough, highlighting key areas to address in research, education and dissemination. The identified priorities will serve as a foundation for future efforts to improve the management and care of individuals with chronic cough.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信