CVVH与RCA期间两种不同碳酸氢盐替代液的比较方案:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Paul Köglberger, Fabian Perschinka, Sebastian J Klein, Timo Mayerhöfer, Sarah Maier, Hanno Ulmer, Romuald Bellmann, Michael Joannidis
{"title":"CVVH与RCA期间两种不同碳酸氢盐替代液的比较方案:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。","authors":"Paul Köglberger, Fabian Perschinka, Sebastian J Klein, Timo Mayerhöfer, Sarah Maier, Hanno Ulmer, Romuald Bellmann, Michael Joannidis","doi":"10.1159/000547401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acid-base disturbances are common issues during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH). Especially using regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA), recent studies have shown that control in intracorporal pH and HCO<sub>3</sub> concentration may be improved when the replacement fluid is changed to a solution with a lower <inline-formula><mml:math id=\"m1\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>HCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration during continuous renal replacement therapy. This prospective trail aimed to compare acid-base balance between a high (HBF) and low (LBF) bicarbonate replacement fluid over a period of 96 h after CVVH initiation using RCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, crossover, phase II, single-center study involving critically ill patients requiring RRT. The two replacement fluids (Phoxilium and Biphozyl) are compared in two groups with 1:1 block randomization and consecutive crossover after 48 h of CVVH. The primary endpoints are the occurrence of at least one pH (>7.45) or <inline-formula><mml:math id=\"m2\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>HCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (>26 mmol/L) excursion within 16-48 h of each treatment phase using a generalized estimating equation approach. The objective was to examine differences of pH and <inline-formula><mml:math id=\"m3\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>HCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between patients who receive LBF and HBF as replacement fluid during CVVH. We hypothesize that during CVVH with LBF, pH, and HCO<sub>3</sub>- excursion rates are significantly lower compared to HBF. Recruitment of 88 study participants is ongoing, with the trial expected to be completed in 2025. Data cleaning, analysis, and publication preparation will follow thereafter. The trial is registered at <ext-link ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"http://ClinicalTrials.gov\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\">ClinicalTrials.gov</ext-link> (NCT04071171) and EudraCT (2019-001262-15).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the broad inclusion and restricted exclusion criteria, we expect the results of the BiPhox-Trial to be broadly applicable to patients in need of CVVH with RCA in the intensive care setting. This trial aims to determine whether the use of LBF results in more stable acid-base parameters compared to HBF during CVVH with RCA in critically ill patients and may guide therapeutic decisions in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8953,"journal":{"name":"Blood Purification","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protocol of the Comparison of Two Different Bicarbonate Replacement Fluids during Continuous Veno-Venous Hemofiltration with Regional Citrate Anticoagulation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Köglberger, Fabian Perschinka, Sebastian J Klein, Timo Mayerhöfer, Sarah Maier, Hanno Ulmer, Romuald Bellmann, Michael Joannidis\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000547401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acid-base disturbances are common issues during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH). Especially using regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA), recent studies have shown that control in intracorporal pH and HCO<sub>3</sub> concentration may be improved when the replacement fluid is changed to a solution with a lower <inline-formula><mml:math id=\\\"m1\\\" xmlns:mml=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>HCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration during continuous renal replacement therapy. This prospective trail aimed to compare acid-base balance between a high (HBF) and low (LBF) bicarbonate replacement fluid over a period of 96 h after CVVH initiation using RCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, crossover, phase II, single-center study involving critically ill patients requiring RRT. The two replacement fluids (Phoxilium and Biphozyl) are compared in two groups with 1:1 block randomization and consecutive crossover after 48 h of CVVH. The primary endpoints are the occurrence of at least one pH (>7.45) or <inline-formula><mml:math id=\\\"m2\\\" xmlns:mml=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>HCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (>26 mmol/L) excursion within 16-48 h of each treatment phase using a generalized estimating equation approach. The objective was to examine differences of pH and <inline-formula><mml:math id=\\\"m3\\\" xmlns:mml=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>HCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between patients who receive LBF and HBF as replacement fluid during CVVH. We hypothesize that during CVVH with LBF, pH, and HCO<sub>3</sub>- excursion rates are significantly lower compared to HBF. Recruitment of 88 study participants is ongoing, with the trial expected to be completed in 2025. Data cleaning, analysis, and publication preparation will follow thereafter. The trial is registered at <ext-link ext-link-type=\\\"uri\\\" xlink:href=\\\"http://ClinicalTrials.gov\\\" xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\">ClinicalTrials.gov</ext-link> (NCT04071171) and EudraCT (2019-001262-15).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the broad inclusion and restricted exclusion criteria, we expect the results of the BiPhox-Trial to be broadly applicable to patients in need of CVVH with RCA in the intensive care setting. This trial aims to determine whether the use of LBF results in more stable acid-base parameters compared to HBF during CVVH with RCA in critically ill patients and may guide therapeutic decisions in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Purification\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Purification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547401\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Purification","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547401","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:酸碱紊乱是连续静脉-静脉血液滤过(CVVH)的常见问题。特别是使用局部柠檬酸抗凝(RCA),最近的研究表明,在持续肾替代治疗(CRRT)期间,当替代液改为HCO3-浓度较低的溶液时,体内pH和HCO3-浓度的控制可能会得到改善。这项前瞻性试验旨在比较RCA启动CVVH后96小时内高(HBF)和低(LBF)碳酸氢盐替代液之间的酸碱平衡。方法/设计:这是一项前瞻性、随机、对照、开放标签、交叉、II期、单中心试点研究,涉及需要RRT的危重患者。CVVH 48小时后,两组采用1:1分组随机和连续交叉比较两种替代液体(Phoxilium和Biphozyl)。使用广义估计方程(GEE)方法,主要终点是在每个治疗阶段的16-48小时内至少发生一次pH(> 7.45)或HCO3- (> 26 mmol/l)偏移。主要目的:目的是检查在CVVH期间接受LBF和HBF作为替代液体的患者之间的pH和HCO3-的差异。假设:我们假设,与HBF相比,LBF在CVVH期间,pH和HCO3-偏移率显着降低。试验状态:88名研究参与者的招募正在进行中,预计试验将于2025年完成。随后将进行数据清理、分析和出版准备。讨论:考虑到广泛的纳入和限制性的排除标准,我们预计BiPhox-Trial的结果将广泛适用于重症监护环境中需要CVVH合并RCA的患者。本试验旨在确定在危重患者合并RCA的CVVH期间,与HBF相比,使用LBF是否能获得更稳定的酸碱参数,并可能指导临床实践中的治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protocol of the Comparison of Two Different Bicarbonate Replacement Fluids during Continuous Veno-Venous Hemofiltration with Regional Citrate Anticoagulation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Introduction: Acid-base disturbances are common issues during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH). Especially using regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA), recent studies have shown that control in intracorporal pH and HCO3 concentration may be improved when the replacement fluid is changed to a solution with a lower HCO3- concentration during continuous renal replacement therapy. This prospective trail aimed to compare acid-base balance between a high (HBF) and low (LBF) bicarbonate replacement fluid over a period of 96 h after CVVH initiation using RCA.

Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, crossover, phase II, single-center study involving critically ill patients requiring RRT. The two replacement fluids (Phoxilium and Biphozyl) are compared in two groups with 1:1 block randomization and consecutive crossover after 48 h of CVVH. The primary endpoints are the occurrence of at least one pH (>7.45) or HCO3- (>26 mmol/L) excursion within 16-48 h of each treatment phase using a generalized estimating equation approach. The objective was to examine differences of pH and HCO3- between patients who receive LBF and HBF as replacement fluid during CVVH. We hypothesize that during CVVH with LBF, pH, and HCO3- excursion rates are significantly lower compared to HBF. Recruitment of 88 study participants is ongoing, with the trial expected to be completed in 2025. Data cleaning, analysis, and publication preparation will follow thereafter. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04071171) and EudraCT (2019-001262-15).

Conclusion: Given the broad inclusion and restricted exclusion criteria, we expect the results of the BiPhox-Trial to be broadly applicable to patients in need of CVVH with RCA in the intensive care setting. This trial aims to determine whether the use of LBF results in more stable acid-base parameters compared to HBF during CVVH with RCA in critically ill patients and may guide therapeutic decisions in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Purification
Blood Purification 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical information on hemodialysis, hemofiltration, peritoneal dialysis and apheresis is featured in this journal. Recognizing the critical importance of equipment and procedures, particular emphasis has been placed on reports, drawn from a wide range of fields, describing technical advances and improvements in methodology. Papers reflect the search for cost-effective solutions which increase not only patient survival but also patient comfort and disease improvement through prevention or correction of undesirable effects. Advances in vascular access and blood anticoagulation, problems associated with exposure of blood to foreign surfaces and acute-care nephrology, including continuous therapies, also receive attention. Nephrologists, internists, intensivists and hospital staff involved in dialysis, apheresis and immunoadsorption for acute and chronic solid organ failure will find this journal useful and informative. ''Blood Purification'' also serves as a platform for multidisciplinary experiences involving nephrologists, cardiologists and critical care physicians in order to expand the level of interaction between different disciplines and specialities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信