Thomas Kavanagh, Thomas Kilpatrick, Ben Hardy, Sang Lee, Miles Seavill, Chun-Wun M Lau, Sam Bullard, Samira Green, Matthew Cadd
{"title":"静脉注射与吸入米力农在接受心脏手术的已知肺动脉高压患者中的作用:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Thomas Kavanagh, Thomas Kilpatrick, Ben Hardy, Sang Lee, Miles Seavill, Chun-Wun M Lau, Sam Bullard, Samira Green, Matthew Cadd","doi":"10.4103/aca.aca_271_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>To summarize the evidence on the hemodynamic effects and vasopressor requirements of adult patients with known pulmonary hypertension (PH) undergoing cardiac surgery treated with intravenous and inhaled milrinone. A total of 400 patients in 5 prospective (4 RCT) studies were included for pooled analysis. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome; mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) between groups (MD: -4.80, 95% CI -10.57 to 0.98). Inhaled milrinone was associated with a greater systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) (MD: 259.21, 95% CI 168.70 to 349.72) and reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (MD: -4.64, 95% CI -5.47 to -3.81). There were no observable differences in mean arterial pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, cardiac index, or central venous pressure. All studies included were assessed to be moderate/some concern risk of bias. Inhaled milrinone has not been shown to have a significant beneficial effect on MPAP and SVR when compared to intravenous milrinone in patients with known PH undergoing cardiac surgery. However, it has shown some benefits in maintaining MAP and improving oxygenation in this patient cohort. The study is limited by the bias of the included studies and the variability of inhaled drug dosage and administration timing, further well-powered randomized controlled trials are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":7997,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous Versus Inhaled Milrinone in Patients with Known Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Kavanagh, Thomas Kilpatrick, Ben Hardy, Sang Lee, Miles Seavill, Chun-Wun M Lau, Sam Bullard, Samira Green, Matthew Cadd\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aca.aca_271_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>To summarize the evidence on the hemodynamic effects and vasopressor requirements of adult patients with known pulmonary hypertension (PH) undergoing cardiac surgery treated with intravenous and inhaled milrinone. A total of 400 patients in 5 prospective (4 RCT) studies were included for pooled analysis. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome; mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) between groups (MD: -4.80, 95% CI -10.57 to 0.98). Inhaled milrinone was associated with a greater systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) (MD: 259.21, 95% CI 168.70 to 349.72) and reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (MD: -4.64, 95% CI -5.47 to -3.81). There were no observable differences in mean arterial pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, cardiac index, or central venous pressure. All studies included were assessed to be moderate/some concern risk of bias. Inhaled milrinone has not been shown to have a significant beneficial effect on MPAP and SVR when compared to intravenous milrinone in patients with known PH undergoing cardiac surgery. However, it has shown some benefits in maintaining MAP and improving oxygenation in this patient cohort. The study is limited by the bias of the included studies and the variability of inhaled drug dosage and administration timing, further well-powered randomized controlled trials are required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_271_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_271_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:总结经静脉和吸入米力农治疗已知肺动脉高压(PH)的成人心脏手术患者的血流动力学影响和血管升压药物需求的证据。5项前瞻性研究(4项RCT)共纳入400例患者进行汇总分析。主要结局无显著差异;组间平均肺动脉压(MPAP) (MD: -4.80, 95% CI -10.57 ~ 0.98)。吸入米力酮与更高的全身血管阻力指数(SVRI) (MD: 259.21, 95% CI 168.70至349.72)和肺毛细血管楔形压降低(MD: -4.64, 95% CI -5.47至-3.81)相关。在平均动脉压、肺血管阻力、心脏指数或中心静脉压方面没有观察到的差异。所有纳入的研究均被评估为中度/有一定的偏倚风险。在已知PH值的心脏手术患者中,与静脉注射米力酮相比,吸入米力酮对MPAP和SVR没有显著的有益影响。然而,在该患者队列中,它在维持MAP和改善氧合方面显示出一些益处。该研究受到纳入研究的偏倚以及吸入药物剂量和给药时间的可变性的限制,需要进一步进行有力的随机对照试验。
Intravenous Versus Inhaled Milrinone in Patients with Known Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Abstract: To summarize the evidence on the hemodynamic effects and vasopressor requirements of adult patients with known pulmonary hypertension (PH) undergoing cardiac surgery treated with intravenous and inhaled milrinone. A total of 400 patients in 5 prospective (4 RCT) studies were included for pooled analysis. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome; mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) between groups (MD: -4.80, 95% CI -10.57 to 0.98). Inhaled milrinone was associated with a greater systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) (MD: 259.21, 95% CI 168.70 to 349.72) and reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (MD: -4.64, 95% CI -5.47 to -3.81). There were no observable differences in mean arterial pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, cardiac index, or central venous pressure. All studies included were assessed to be moderate/some concern risk of bias. Inhaled milrinone has not been shown to have a significant beneficial effect on MPAP and SVR when compared to intravenous milrinone in patients with known PH undergoing cardiac surgery. However, it has shown some benefits in maintaining MAP and improving oxygenation in this patient cohort. The study is limited by the bias of the included studies and the variability of inhaled drug dosage and administration timing, further well-powered randomized controlled trials are required.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia (ACA) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular Thoracic Anaesthesiologists. The journal is indexed with PubMed/MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, IndMed and MedInd. The journal’s full text is online at www.annals.in. With the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing articles ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance. In addition, the journal would allow free access (Open Access) to its contents, which is likely to attract more readers and citations to articles published in ACA. Authors do not have to pay for submission, processing or publication of articles in ACA.