欧洲企业减排效果对财务约束的影响:基于五螺旋模型的证据

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Emma García-Meca , Jennifer Martínez-Ferrero , Carmelo Reverte
{"title":"欧洲企业减排效果对财务约束的影响:基于五螺旋模型的证据","authors":"Emma García-Meca ,&nbsp;Jennifer Martínez-Ferrero ,&nbsp;Carmelo Reverte","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study analyzes (i) whether firms that are more committed to reducing emissions benefit from reduced financial constraints and (ii) the moderating effects of the five institutional systems of the Quintuple Helix Model (QHM), i.e., economic, education, culture, governance, and natural environment. Based on a sample of quoted European companies for the 2015–2020 period, we document that firms with greater emissions reduction effectiveness benefit from better access to finance due to fewer financial constraints. We also show that this reduction is more substantial in countries with poorer governance quality, lower GDP growth and economic freedom, less scientific production and public educational expenditure and less natural capital. Moreover, the effect of firms’ emissions reduction effectiveness on reducing financial constraints is amplified in companies situated in countries characterized by more individualism, masculinity, uncertainty avoidance and power distance, and less long-term orientation and indulgence. Overall, our results suggest a substitution effect between the market mechanism and country-level characteristics to incentivize firms to behave responsibly in countries where the QHM institutional dimensions do not favor a commitment to environmental sustainability. This novel finding of our research can be explained in light of the institutional voids theory, which encourages a more dynamic approach for examining how firms strategize – alone or in conjunction with other actors – to compensate or substitute institutional weaknesses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51430,"journal":{"name":"Research in International Business and Finance","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 103069"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of European firms’ emissions reduction effectiveness on financial constraints: Evidence from the quintuple helix model perspective\",\"authors\":\"Emma García-Meca ,&nbsp;Jennifer Martínez-Ferrero ,&nbsp;Carmelo Reverte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study analyzes (i) whether firms that are more committed to reducing emissions benefit from reduced financial constraints and (ii) the moderating effects of the five institutional systems of the Quintuple Helix Model (QHM), i.e., economic, education, culture, governance, and natural environment. Based on a sample of quoted European companies for the 2015–2020 period, we document that firms with greater emissions reduction effectiveness benefit from better access to finance due to fewer financial constraints. We also show that this reduction is more substantial in countries with poorer governance quality, lower GDP growth and economic freedom, less scientific production and public educational expenditure and less natural capital. Moreover, the effect of firms’ emissions reduction effectiveness on reducing financial constraints is amplified in companies situated in countries characterized by more individualism, masculinity, uncertainty avoidance and power distance, and less long-term orientation and indulgence. Overall, our results suggest a substitution effect between the market mechanism and country-level characteristics to incentivize firms to behave responsibly in countries where the QHM institutional dimensions do not favor a commitment to environmental sustainability. This novel finding of our research can be explained in light of the institutional voids theory, which encourages a more dynamic approach for examining how firms strategize – alone or in conjunction with other actors – to compensate or substitute institutional weaknesses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103069\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925003253\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in International Business and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925003253","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了(i)更致力于减排的企业是否从减少的财务约束中受益;(ii)五元螺旋模型(QHM)中经济、教育、文化、治理和自然环境五个制度体系的调节作用。基于2015-2020年期间欧洲上市公司的样本,我们发现,由于较少的财务约束,减排效率更高的公司更容易获得融资,从而受益。我们还表明,在治理质量较差、GDP增长和经济自由度较低、科学生产和公共教育支出较少以及自然资本较少的国家,这种减少更为显著。此外,在个人主义、阳刚之气、不确定性规避和权力距离较强、长期导向和放纵较少的国家,企业减排效果对减少财务约束的作用被放大。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,在QHM制度维度不支持承诺环境可持续性的国家,市场机制和国家层面特征之间存在替代效应,以激励企业负责任地行事。我们研究的这一新颖发现可以用制度空白理论来解释,该理论鼓励采用一种更动态的方法来研究企业如何制定战略(单独或与其他行为者联合)来弥补或替代制度弱点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of European firms’ emissions reduction effectiveness on financial constraints: Evidence from the quintuple helix model perspective
This study analyzes (i) whether firms that are more committed to reducing emissions benefit from reduced financial constraints and (ii) the moderating effects of the five institutional systems of the Quintuple Helix Model (QHM), i.e., economic, education, culture, governance, and natural environment. Based on a sample of quoted European companies for the 2015–2020 period, we document that firms with greater emissions reduction effectiveness benefit from better access to finance due to fewer financial constraints. We also show that this reduction is more substantial in countries with poorer governance quality, lower GDP growth and economic freedom, less scientific production and public educational expenditure and less natural capital. Moreover, the effect of firms’ emissions reduction effectiveness on reducing financial constraints is amplified in companies situated in countries characterized by more individualism, masculinity, uncertainty avoidance and power distance, and less long-term orientation and indulgence. Overall, our results suggest a substitution effect between the market mechanism and country-level characteristics to incentivize firms to behave responsibly in countries where the QHM institutional dimensions do not favor a commitment to environmental sustainability. This novel finding of our research can be explained in light of the institutional voids theory, which encourages a more dynamic approach for examining how firms strategize – alone or in conjunction with other actors – to compensate or substitute institutional weaknesses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.20%
发文量
240
期刊介绍: Research in International Business and Finance (RIBAF) seeks to consolidate its position as a premier scholarly vehicle of academic finance. The Journal publishes high quality, insightful, well-written papers that explore current and new issues in international finance. Papers that foster dialogue, innovation, and intellectual risk-taking in financial studies; as well as shed light on the interaction between finance and broader societal concerns are particularly appreciated. The Journal welcomes submissions that seek to expand the boundaries of academic finance and otherwise challenge the discipline. Papers studying finance using a variety of methodologies; as well as interdisciplinary studies will be considered for publication. Papers that examine topical issues using extensive international data sets are welcome. Single-country studies can also be considered for publication provided that they develop novel methodological and theoretical approaches or fall within the Journal''s priority themes. It is especially important that single-country studies communicate to the reader why the particular chosen country is especially relevant to the issue being investigated. [...] The scope of topics that are most interesting to RIBAF readers include the following: -Financial markets and institutions -Financial practices and sustainability -The impact of national culture on finance -The impact of formal and informal institutions on finance -Privatizations, public financing, and nonprofit issues in finance -Interdisciplinary financial studies -Finance and international development -International financial crises and regulation -Financialization studies -International financial integration and architecture -Behavioral aspects in finance -Consumer finance -Methodologies and conceptualization issues related to finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信