Nicholas Della Marta , Alexander Yuile , Claire Mok , Joe Wei , Meredith Oatley , Tracey Skinner , Samuel Miller , Amanda L. Hudson , Sheryl van Nunen , Stephen J. Clarke , Connie I. Diakos , Madhawa De Silva , David L. Chan , Gavin M. Marx , Nick Pavlakis
{"title":"半乳糖- α -1,3-半乳糖抗体的治疗前检测方案,以减轻西妥昔单抗过敏反应的风险-一项回顾性队列回顾","authors":"Nicholas Della Marta , Alexander Yuile , Claire Mok , Joe Wei , Meredith Oatley , Tracey Skinner , Samuel Miller , Amanda L. Hudson , Sheryl van Nunen , Stephen J. Clarke , Connie I. Diakos , Madhawa De Silva , David L. Chan , Gavin M. Marx , Nick Pavlakis","doi":"10.1016/j.ctarc.2025.100969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Cetuximab improves survival in <em>KRAS</em> wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer. However, high rates of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) limit its use, with HSR rates up to 10–20 %. A major driver of cetuximab HSR is from pre-formed IgE antibody response to galactose-1,3-alpha-galactose (alpha-gal). Evidence from retrospective studies supports alpha-gal pre-screening in this setting. This study reports the impact of prospective alpha-gal antibody screening on cetuximab HSR.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>Records were reviewed across three medical oncology centres that have adopted alpha-gal antibody screening measures. Data for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab were retrieved. All centres assessed alpha-gal levels using the ImmunoCAP® immunoassay. Due to variability in alpha-gal screening practices across study sites, a standardised protocol was applied to all cases. This protocol allowed cetuximab administration if alpha-gal levels were ≤0.10 kUA/L, but prohibited it if alpha-gal levels were >0.10 kUA/L in favour of panitumumab administration. Patients were allocated to either the Alpha-gal Pre-screening Applied (‘Pre-screening’) or Alpha-gal Pre-screening Not Applied (‘Reference’) cohorts based on protocol requirements being met. The primary outcome between these patient groups was the incidence of cetuximab HSRs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 254 assessable patients, 39 underwent the pre-treatment screening protocol. Of the Pre-screening group, 3% (<em>n</em>=1/39) experienced a cetuximab HSR compared to 16% (<em>n</em>=35/215) in the Reference group (Odds ratio (OR) 0.14; 95% CI 0.0033–0.86, <em>p</em> <em>=</em> 0.02). Patients with alpha-gal antibody titres >0.10 kUA/L were more likely to experience a cetuximab HSR (OR 69.71; 95% CI 5.18–4296.81, <em>p</em>=0.0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pre-treatment screening for alpha-gal antibodies significantly reduces the incidence of cetuximab HSRs. A testing threshold of 0.10 kUA/L is effective in identifying patients at risk. Implementing this protocol can improve the safety of cetuximab therapy in high-risk populations.</div></div><div><h3>Micro Abstract</h3><div>Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) limit cetuximab use in <em>KRAS</em> wildtype advanced colorectal cancer, with a significant driver being pre-formed IgE antibodies against galactose-1,3-alpha-galactose (alpha-gal). Our multicentric retrospective study assessed the impact of prospective alpha-gal antibody screening on HSR incidence following cetuximab administration. Of 254 assessable patients, pre-treatment alpha-gal antibody screening significantly reduced the incidence of cetuximab HSRs (3% vs 16%; OR 0.14, <em>p</em>=0.02). Our findings support pre-treatment alpha-gal screening to improve safety of cetuximab therapy in high-risk populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9507,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment and research communications","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100969"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A protocol for pre-treatment testing for antibodies to galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose to mitigate the risk of cetuximab hypersensitivity reactions – a retrospective cohort review\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Della Marta , Alexander Yuile , Claire Mok , Joe Wei , Meredith Oatley , Tracey Skinner , Samuel Miller , Amanda L. Hudson , Sheryl van Nunen , Stephen J. Clarke , Connie I. Diakos , Madhawa De Silva , David L. Chan , Gavin M. Marx , Nick Pavlakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctarc.2025.100969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Cetuximab improves survival in <em>KRAS</em> wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer. However, high rates of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) limit its use, with HSR rates up to 10–20 %. A major driver of cetuximab HSR is from pre-formed IgE antibody response to galactose-1,3-alpha-galactose (alpha-gal). Evidence from retrospective studies supports alpha-gal pre-screening in this setting. This study reports the impact of prospective alpha-gal antibody screening on cetuximab HSR.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>Records were reviewed across three medical oncology centres that have adopted alpha-gal antibody screening measures. Data for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab were retrieved. All centres assessed alpha-gal levels using the ImmunoCAP® immunoassay. Due to variability in alpha-gal screening practices across study sites, a standardised protocol was applied to all cases. This protocol allowed cetuximab administration if alpha-gal levels were ≤0.10 kUA/L, but prohibited it if alpha-gal levels were >0.10 kUA/L in favour of panitumumab administration. Patients were allocated to either the Alpha-gal Pre-screening Applied (‘Pre-screening’) or Alpha-gal Pre-screening Not Applied (‘Reference’) cohorts based on protocol requirements being met. The primary outcome between these patient groups was the incidence of cetuximab HSRs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 254 assessable patients, 39 underwent the pre-treatment screening protocol. Of the Pre-screening group, 3% (<em>n</em>=1/39) experienced a cetuximab HSR compared to 16% (<em>n</em>=35/215) in the Reference group (Odds ratio (OR) 0.14; 95% CI 0.0033–0.86, <em>p</em> <em>=</em> 0.02). Patients with alpha-gal antibody titres >0.10 kUA/L were more likely to experience a cetuximab HSR (OR 69.71; 95% CI 5.18–4296.81, <em>p</em>=0.0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pre-treatment screening for alpha-gal antibodies significantly reduces the incidence of cetuximab HSRs. A testing threshold of 0.10 kUA/L is effective in identifying patients at risk. Implementing this protocol can improve the safety of cetuximab therapy in high-risk populations.</div></div><div><h3>Micro Abstract</h3><div>Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) limit cetuximab use in <em>KRAS</em> wildtype advanced colorectal cancer, with a significant driver being pre-formed IgE antibodies against galactose-1,3-alpha-galactose (alpha-gal). Our multicentric retrospective study assessed the impact of prospective alpha-gal antibody screening on HSR incidence following cetuximab administration. Of 254 assessable patients, pre-treatment alpha-gal antibody screening significantly reduced the incidence of cetuximab HSRs (3% vs 16%; OR 0.14, <em>p</em>=0.02). Our findings support pre-treatment alpha-gal screening to improve safety of cetuximab therapy in high-risk populations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer treatment and research communications\",\"volume\":\"44 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100969\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer treatment and research communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294225001054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment and research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294225001054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
A protocol for pre-treatment testing for antibodies to galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose to mitigate the risk of cetuximab hypersensitivity reactions – a retrospective cohort review
Purpose
Cetuximab improves survival in KRAS wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer. However, high rates of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) limit its use, with HSR rates up to 10–20 %. A major driver of cetuximab HSR is from pre-formed IgE antibody response to galactose-1,3-alpha-galactose (alpha-gal). Evidence from retrospective studies supports alpha-gal pre-screening in this setting. This study reports the impact of prospective alpha-gal antibody screening on cetuximab HSR.
Patients and Methods
Records were reviewed across three medical oncology centres that have adopted alpha-gal antibody screening measures. Data for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab were retrieved. All centres assessed alpha-gal levels using the ImmunoCAP® immunoassay. Due to variability in alpha-gal screening practices across study sites, a standardised protocol was applied to all cases. This protocol allowed cetuximab administration if alpha-gal levels were ≤0.10 kUA/L, but prohibited it if alpha-gal levels were >0.10 kUA/L in favour of panitumumab administration. Patients were allocated to either the Alpha-gal Pre-screening Applied (‘Pre-screening’) or Alpha-gal Pre-screening Not Applied (‘Reference’) cohorts based on protocol requirements being met. The primary outcome between these patient groups was the incidence of cetuximab HSRs.
Results
Of 254 assessable patients, 39 underwent the pre-treatment screening protocol. Of the Pre-screening group, 3% (n=1/39) experienced a cetuximab HSR compared to 16% (n=35/215) in the Reference group (Odds ratio (OR) 0.14; 95% CI 0.0033–0.86, p= 0.02). Patients with alpha-gal antibody titres >0.10 kUA/L were more likely to experience a cetuximab HSR (OR 69.71; 95% CI 5.18–4296.81, p=0.0001).
Conclusion
Pre-treatment screening for alpha-gal antibodies significantly reduces the incidence of cetuximab HSRs. A testing threshold of 0.10 kUA/L is effective in identifying patients at risk. Implementing this protocol can improve the safety of cetuximab therapy in high-risk populations.
Micro Abstract
Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) limit cetuximab use in KRAS wildtype advanced colorectal cancer, with a significant driver being pre-formed IgE antibodies against galactose-1,3-alpha-galactose (alpha-gal). Our multicentric retrospective study assessed the impact of prospective alpha-gal antibody screening on HSR incidence following cetuximab administration. Of 254 assessable patients, pre-treatment alpha-gal antibody screening significantly reduced the incidence of cetuximab HSRs (3% vs 16%; OR 0.14, p=0.02). Our findings support pre-treatment alpha-gal screening to improve safety of cetuximab therapy in high-risk populations.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications is an international peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing comprehensive basic, translational, and clinical oncology research. The journal is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, policy, and treatment of cancer and provides a global forum for the nurturing and development of future generations of oncology scientists. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications publishes comprehensive reviews and original studies describing various aspects of basic through clinical research of all tumor types. The journal also accepts clinical studies in oncology, with an emphasis on prospective early phase clinical trials. Specific areas of interest include basic, translational, and clinical research and mechanistic approaches; cancer biology; molecular carcinogenesis; genetics and genomics; stem cell and developmental biology; immunology; molecular and cellular oncology; systems biology; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; cancer policy; and integration of various approaches. Our mission is to be the premier source of relevant information through promoting excellence in research and facilitating the timely translation of that science to health care and clinical practice.