大量的社会性:蜜蜂保护,商业,和公地在外喀尔巴阡,乌克兰

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Tanya Richardson
{"title":"大量的社会性:蜜蜂保护,商业,和公地在外喀尔巴阡,乌克兰","authors":"Tanya Richardson","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The loss of intra-species diversity in Western honeybees (<em>Apis mellifera Linnaeus</em>) in places where they evolved is considered a key factor in honeybee declines. Conserving local honeybee populations via a “conservation by utilization” approach is thought to be the most effective response because it fuses breeding for conservation and for commercially-useful traits. Tensions arise, however, from this approach’s dependence on queens’ marketability and its distinctive three-dimensional spatiality. Because queens mate with many drones several kilometers from their nests, conservation- and commercially-oriented breeders rely on isolated mating stations to ensure specific queens and drones mate. This article draws on ethnographic research and oral history interviews conducted between 2018 and 2025 to analyze conflicts over the use of isolated mating areas in western Ukraine’s Transcarpathia Oblast to breed Carpathian honeybees before and after Russia’s full-scale invasion. Suspicion that non-Carpathian drones were placed at a commercial mating station led to the creation of new stations, including a collaborative community-based one which sought to “common” the “drone atmosphere.” I argue that these conflicts can best be understood by a) framing the history of Carpathian honeybees in terms of resource-making on imperial peripheries and b) using a concept of “voluminous socialities” which builds on and extends geographical and anthropological conceptualizations of non-military-, non-state-focused volumes, sociality, and interspecies relations. My analysis enriches geographical debates about three-dimensional spatiality and deepens our understanding of what it means to do honeybee conservation in a non-EU European periphery amidst changing political economies of beekeeping and an imperial war.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 104348"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voluminous Socialities: Honeybee Conservation, Commerce, and Commons in Transcarpathia, Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"Tanya Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The loss of intra-species diversity in Western honeybees (<em>Apis mellifera Linnaeus</em>) in places where they evolved is considered a key factor in honeybee declines. Conserving local honeybee populations via a “conservation by utilization” approach is thought to be the most effective response because it fuses breeding for conservation and for commercially-useful traits. Tensions arise, however, from this approach’s dependence on queens’ marketability and its distinctive three-dimensional spatiality. Because queens mate with many drones several kilometers from their nests, conservation- and commercially-oriented breeders rely on isolated mating stations to ensure specific queens and drones mate. This article draws on ethnographic research and oral history interviews conducted between 2018 and 2025 to analyze conflicts over the use of isolated mating areas in western Ukraine’s Transcarpathia Oblast to breed Carpathian honeybees before and after Russia’s full-scale invasion. Suspicion that non-Carpathian drones were placed at a commercial mating station led to the creation of new stations, including a collaborative community-based one which sought to “common” the “drone atmosphere.” I argue that these conflicts can best be understood by a) framing the history of Carpathian honeybees in terms of resource-making on imperial peripheries and b) using a concept of “voluminous socialities” which builds on and extends geographical and anthropological conceptualizations of non-military-, non-state-focused volumes, sociality, and interspecies relations. My analysis enriches geographical debates about three-dimensional spatiality and deepens our understanding of what it means to do honeybee conservation in a non-EU European periphery amidst changing political economies of beekeeping and an imperial war.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001484\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

西方蜜蜂(Apis mellifera Linnaeus)在它们进化的地方物种内多样性的丧失被认为是蜜蜂数量减少的一个关键因素。通过“利用保护”方法保护当地蜜蜂种群被认为是最有效的应对措施,因为它融合了保护和商业有用性状的育种。然而,由于这种方法依赖于皇后的市场性及其独特的三维空间性,紧张局势出现了。由于蜂王和许多雄蜂在距离巢穴几公里的地方交配,以保护和商业为导向的繁殖者依靠孤立的交配站来确保特定的蜂王和雄蜂交配。本文借鉴了2018年至2025年间进行的人种学研究和口述历史访谈,分析了俄罗斯全面入侵前后,在乌克兰西部的外喀尔巴阡州(Transcarpathia)使用隔离交配区繁殖喀尔巴阡蜜蜂的冲突。怀疑非喀尔巴阡无人机被放置在商业交配站,导致了新站的创建,包括一个以社区为基础的协作站,试图“共同”“无人机氛围”。我认为,这些冲突可以通过以下方式得到最好的理解:a)根据帝国外围的资源制造来构建喀尔巴阡蜜蜂的历史;b)使用“大量社会性”的概念,该概念建立并扩展了非军事、非国家关注的数量、社会性和物种间关系的地理和人类学概念。我的分析丰富了关于三维空间的地理辩论,加深了我们对在不断变化的养蜂业政治经济和帝国战争中在非欧盟欧洲外围地区进行蜜蜂保护意味着什么的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Voluminous Socialities: Honeybee Conservation, Commerce, and Commons in Transcarpathia, Ukraine
The loss of intra-species diversity in Western honeybees (Apis mellifera Linnaeus) in places where they evolved is considered a key factor in honeybee declines. Conserving local honeybee populations via a “conservation by utilization” approach is thought to be the most effective response because it fuses breeding for conservation and for commercially-useful traits. Tensions arise, however, from this approach’s dependence on queens’ marketability and its distinctive three-dimensional spatiality. Because queens mate with many drones several kilometers from their nests, conservation- and commercially-oriented breeders rely on isolated mating stations to ensure specific queens and drones mate. This article draws on ethnographic research and oral history interviews conducted between 2018 and 2025 to analyze conflicts over the use of isolated mating areas in western Ukraine’s Transcarpathia Oblast to breed Carpathian honeybees before and after Russia’s full-scale invasion. Suspicion that non-Carpathian drones were placed at a commercial mating station led to the creation of new stations, including a collaborative community-based one which sought to “common” the “drone atmosphere.” I argue that these conflicts can best be understood by a) framing the history of Carpathian honeybees in terms of resource-making on imperial peripheries and b) using a concept of “voluminous socialities” which builds on and extends geographical and anthropological conceptualizations of non-military-, non-state-focused volumes, sociality, and interspecies relations. My analysis enriches geographical debates about three-dimensional spatiality and deepens our understanding of what it means to do honeybee conservation in a non-EU European periphery amidst changing political economies of beekeeping and an imperial war.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信