推动变革:减少发动机空转和空气污染的心理干预的范围审查

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Fanny Lalot , Hirotaka Imada , Tim Hopthrow , Dominic Abrams
{"title":"推动变革:减少发动机空转和空气污染的心理干预的范围审查","authors":"Fanny Lalot ,&nbsp;Hirotaka Imada ,&nbsp;Tim Hopthrow ,&nbsp;Dominic Abrams","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Emissions from stationary vehicles (i.e., engine idling) are a major contributor to air pollution, a serious environmental issue that also threatens physical and mental health. Engineering and technical sciences focus on tackling idling pollution through technological advancement but they mostly ignore the human factor (the vehicle driver). In contrast, psychological science has proposed and tested human-centered interventions aiming to influence drivers’ behavior directly. Despite their crucial potential to inform strategies for improving public health, these tests have been relatively scarce and dispersed across time and place. Here we conduct a systematic literature search adhering to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines to establish a scoping review of behavior change interventions to reduce engine idling. A search of the Web of Science, Scopus, and PsychINFO databases yielded 26 relevant studies: 11 relying on individual training, 3 on feedback, 5 on community-based interventions, and 7 on psychological messaging. The review suggests that individual training may be effective but mostly in the short-term, with less systematic effects appearing in the longer term. Providing feedback on driving is also an effective approach, especially when used to signal undesirable behavior (i.e., via negative feedback). Community-based interventions emerge as a costly but effective approach, when they succeed to engage community members. Finally, theory-led psychological messaging may be especially effective but message content is key and not every message yields effects. The review summarizes the findings of the existing research, highlights strengths and limitations, and provides future research directions for efficient ways of tackling engine idling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102691"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Driving change: A scoping review of psychological interventions to reduce engine idling and air pollution\",\"authors\":\"Fanny Lalot ,&nbsp;Hirotaka Imada ,&nbsp;Tim Hopthrow ,&nbsp;Dominic Abrams\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Emissions from stationary vehicles (i.e., engine idling) are a major contributor to air pollution, a serious environmental issue that also threatens physical and mental health. Engineering and technical sciences focus on tackling idling pollution through technological advancement but they mostly ignore the human factor (the vehicle driver). In contrast, psychological science has proposed and tested human-centered interventions aiming to influence drivers’ behavior directly. Despite their crucial potential to inform strategies for improving public health, these tests have been relatively scarce and dispersed across time and place. Here we conduct a systematic literature search adhering to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines to establish a scoping review of behavior change interventions to reduce engine idling. A search of the Web of Science, Scopus, and PsychINFO databases yielded 26 relevant studies: 11 relying on individual training, 3 on feedback, 5 on community-based interventions, and 7 on psychological messaging. The review suggests that individual training may be effective but mostly in the short-term, with less systematic effects appearing in the longer term. Providing feedback on driving is also an effective approach, especially when used to signal undesirable behavior (i.e., via negative feedback). Community-based interventions emerge as a costly but effective approach, when they succeed to engage community members. Finally, theory-led psychological messaging may be especially effective but message content is key and not every message yields effects. The review summarizes the findings of the existing research, highlights strengths and limitations, and provides future research directions for efficient ways of tackling engine idling.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102691\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425001744\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425001744","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

固定车辆的排放(即发动机空转)是造成空气污染的一个主要因素,这是一个严重的环境问题,也威胁到身心健康。工程和技术科学致力于通过技术进步解决怠速污染问题,但它们大多忽略了人为因素(车辆驾驶员)。相反,心理科学提出并测试了以人为中心的干预措施,旨在直接影响司机的行为。尽管这些检测在为改善公共卫生的战略提供信息方面具有重要潜力,但它们相对较少,而且在不同的时间和地点分散。在此,我们根据PRISMA 2020指南进行了系统的文献检索,以建立减少发动机空转的行为改变干预措施的范围审查。对Web of Science、Scopus和PsychINFO数据库的搜索得出了26项相关研究:11项依赖于个人培训,3项依赖于反馈,5项依赖于社区干预,7项依赖于心理信息。该研究表明,个别训练可能是有效的,但主要是在短期内,较长期的系统性效果较少。在驾驶过程中提供反馈也是一种有效的方法,尤其是当被用来指示不良行为时(即通过负面反馈)。以社区为基础的干预措施如果能够成功地吸引社区成员的参与,就会成为一种代价高昂但有效的方法。最后,以理论为导向的心理信息可能特别有效,但信息内容是关键,并不是每个信息都能产生效果。本文总结了已有的研究成果,强调了优势和局限性,并提出了未来有效解决发动机空转问题的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Driving change: A scoping review of psychological interventions to reduce engine idling and air pollution
Emissions from stationary vehicles (i.e., engine idling) are a major contributor to air pollution, a serious environmental issue that also threatens physical and mental health. Engineering and technical sciences focus on tackling idling pollution through technological advancement but they mostly ignore the human factor (the vehicle driver). In contrast, psychological science has proposed and tested human-centered interventions aiming to influence drivers’ behavior directly. Despite their crucial potential to inform strategies for improving public health, these tests have been relatively scarce and dispersed across time and place. Here we conduct a systematic literature search adhering to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines to establish a scoping review of behavior change interventions to reduce engine idling. A search of the Web of Science, Scopus, and PsychINFO databases yielded 26 relevant studies: 11 relying on individual training, 3 on feedback, 5 on community-based interventions, and 7 on psychological messaging. The review suggests that individual training may be effective but mostly in the short-term, with less systematic effects appearing in the longer term. Providing feedback on driving is also an effective approach, especially when used to signal undesirable behavior (i.e., via negative feedback). Community-based interventions emerge as a costly but effective approach, when they succeed to engage community members. Finally, theory-led psychological messaging may be especially effective but message content is key and not every message yields effects. The review summarizes the findings of the existing research, highlights strengths and limitations, and provides future research directions for efficient ways of tackling engine idling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信