一元论或另一元论。精神厌食症对青少年的理论考虑和临床影响

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Elise Pelladeau
{"title":"一元论或另一元论。精神厌食症对青少年的理论考虑和临床影响","authors":"Elise Pelladeau","doi":"10.1016/j.evopsy.2025.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>In this article, we will look at the object in psychoanalysis, and more specifically the object of excitation, as a drive coordinate between original monism and the primacy of the other. We will question the function of the object in the relationship to excitation, particularly in adolescence.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>To illustrate our remarks, we will use the weekly psychotherapy of an adolescent girl presenting an anorexia nervosa syndrome.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The treatment also brought up to date the link to the drive object by accentuating a relationship to excitation locked in the pubertal process. Instead of emancipation, it would seem to be a form of reactionary over-investment of the biological body in its very constraints, in order to counterbalance them: it would be a question of drying up the drive body, by systematically going against the needs of the biological body, whatever the cost. The question of the object is thus very much embroiled in this biphasic sexuality in its adolescent version, but also in the negotiation of arousal under the primacy of the other, which is particularly precocious.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>If adolescence is not “a period of reliving this separation-individuation”, then how can we think about the instinctual impact on the negotiation of the bond with the other of an effective separation, whether total or partial? The question of the object caught in the net of libidinal subversion and its pitfalls would then open up avenues of release in therapy directly linked to the modalities of satisfaction in the transference.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The purpose of this article is not to make a generic decision in favor of one theoretical/clinical model that would supersede others in all circumstances, but our clinical practice clearly invites us to subscribe to the contributions of Laplanche, and also of Dejours, for whom the involvement of the body is at the forefront of libidinal subversion and its designs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45007,"journal":{"name":"Evolution Psychiatrique","volume":"90 3","pages":"Pages 443-456"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monisme primaire ou primat de l’autre. Considérations théoriques et implications cliniques à l’adolescence à partir d’un cas d’anorexie mentale\",\"authors\":\"Elise Pelladeau\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evopsy.2025.03.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>In this article, we will look at the object in psychoanalysis, and more specifically the object of excitation, as a drive coordinate between original monism and the primacy of the other. We will question the function of the object in the relationship to excitation, particularly in adolescence.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>To illustrate our remarks, we will use the weekly psychotherapy of an adolescent girl presenting an anorexia nervosa syndrome.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The treatment also brought up to date the link to the drive object by accentuating a relationship to excitation locked in the pubertal process. Instead of emancipation, it would seem to be a form of reactionary over-investment of the biological body in its very constraints, in order to counterbalance them: it would be a question of drying up the drive body, by systematically going against the needs of the biological body, whatever the cost. The question of the object is thus very much embroiled in this biphasic sexuality in its adolescent version, but also in the negotiation of arousal under the primacy of the other, which is particularly precocious.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>If adolescence is not “a period of reliving this separation-individuation”, then how can we think about the instinctual impact on the negotiation of the bond with the other of an effective separation, whether total or partial? The question of the object caught in the net of libidinal subversion and its pitfalls would then open up avenues of release in therapy directly linked to the modalities of satisfaction in the transference.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The purpose of this article is not to make a generic decision in favor of one theoretical/clinical model that would supersede others in all circumstances, but our clinical practice clearly invites us to subscribe to the contributions of Laplanche, and also of Dejours, for whom the involvement of the body is at the forefront of libidinal subversion and its designs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolution Psychiatrique\",\"volume\":\"90 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 443-456\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolution Psychiatrique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014385525000416\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution Psychiatrique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014385525000416","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我们将把精神分析中的对象,更具体地说是兴奋的对象,作为原始一元论和他者至上之间的驱动坐标。我们将质疑客体在刺激关系中的作用,特别是在青少年时期。方法:为了说明我们的观点,我们将使用一个表现为神经性厌食症综合征的青春期女孩的每周心理治疗。结果该疗法还通过强调青春期过程中锁定的与兴奋的关系,更新了与驱动对象的联系。而不是解放,这似乎是一种对生物身体的限制的反动过度投资的形式,为了平衡它们:这将是一个通过系统地违背生物身体的需求来枯竭驱动身体的问题,无论付出什么代价。客体的问题因此被卷入了青春期的双相性行为中,也卷入了在他者的首要地位下的性唤起的协商中,这是特别早熟的。如果青春期不是“一个重新体验这种分离-个性化的时期”,那么我们怎么能想到与他人协商有效分离的本能影响,无论是完全的还是部分的?被困在力比多颠覆之网中的对象及其陷阱的问题,随后将在治疗中开辟与移情中满足的形式直接相关的释放途径。这篇文章的目的不是为了做出一个通用的决定,支持一种理论/临床模型,在所有情况下都可以取代其他模型,但我们的临床实践显然邀请我们赞同拉普朗什和德约尔的贡献,对他们来说,身体的参与是力比多颠覆及其设计的最前沿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Monisme primaire ou primat de l’autre. Considérations théoriques et implications cliniques à l’adolescence à partir d’un cas d’anorexie mentale

Objective

In this article, we will look at the object in psychoanalysis, and more specifically the object of excitation, as a drive coordinate between original monism and the primacy of the other. We will question the function of the object in the relationship to excitation, particularly in adolescence.

Methodology

To illustrate our remarks, we will use the weekly psychotherapy of an adolescent girl presenting an anorexia nervosa syndrome.

Results

The treatment also brought up to date the link to the drive object by accentuating a relationship to excitation locked in the pubertal process. Instead of emancipation, it would seem to be a form of reactionary over-investment of the biological body in its very constraints, in order to counterbalance them: it would be a question of drying up the drive body, by systematically going against the needs of the biological body, whatever the cost. The question of the object is thus very much embroiled in this biphasic sexuality in its adolescent version, but also in the negotiation of arousal under the primacy of the other, which is particularly precocious.

Discussion

If adolescence is not “a period of reliving this separation-individuation”, then how can we think about the instinctual impact on the negotiation of the bond with the other of an effective separation, whether total or partial? The question of the object caught in the net of libidinal subversion and its pitfalls would then open up avenues of release in therapy directly linked to the modalities of satisfaction in the transference.

Conclusion

The purpose of this article is not to make a generic decision in favor of one theoretical/clinical model that would supersede others in all circumstances, but our clinical practice clearly invites us to subscribe to the contributions of Laplanche, and also of Dejours, for whom the involvement of the body is at the forefront of libidinal subversion and its designs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
50.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Une revue de référence pour le praticien, le chercheur et le étudiant en sciences humaines Cahiers de psychologie clinique et de psychopathologie générale fondés en 1925, Évolution psychiatrique est restée fidèle à sa mission de ouverture de la psychiatrie à tous les courants de pensée scientifique et philosophique, la recherche clinique et les réflexions critiques dans son champ comme dans les domaines connexes. Attentive à histoire de la psychiatrie autant aux dernières avancées de la recherche en biologie, en psychanalyse et en sciences sociales, la revue constitue un outil de information et une source de référence pour les praticiens, les chercheurs et les étudiants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信