《女人身体里男人的大脑》:瓦伦丁·马格南和塞缪尔·波齐的“心理”性问题(1911)

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Mathias Winter
{"title":"《女人身体里男人的大脑》:瓦伦丁·马格南和塞缪尔·波齐的“心理”性问题(1911)","authors":"Mathias Winter","doi":"10.1016/j.evopsy.2025.04.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This article explores the history of medical and psychological expertise on sex/gender identity by studying the presentation of a case of “hermaphroditism” given by the psychiatrist Valentin Magnan and the surgeon Samuel Pozzi in 1911. It examines how these authors dealt with the discrepancy between the organic and psychosocial dimensions of sex, and it highlights the epistemological and ontological problems that emerge. The article also discusses the continuing echoes in current controversies in gender medicine.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our study consists of an in-depth analysis of a presentation given to the French Academy of Medicine regarding a case of <em>“inversion du sens génital chez un pseudo-hermaphrodite féminin</em> [sexual inversion in a female pseudo-hermaphrodite]”. We conducted a detailed analysis of the minutes of the presentation, with the aim of revealing the internal logic, theoretical presuppositions, and metaphysical implications of the clinical judgements made by Magnan and Pozzi. Our primary sources include other texts by Magnan and his contemporaries on homosexuality and “sexual perversion”. Historical and epistemological studies of sex, sexuality, and hermaphroditism are used as secondary sources. Our theoretical framework draws mainly on the epistemological concepts of Kuhn and Bachelard.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The clinical observations presented by Magnan opposed the patient's organic sex, which was, despite the presence of ambiguous genitalia, unambiguously female given the histology of the patient's gonads (ovaries), and the patient's psychological sex, which was defined as male based on both the patient's sexual attraction to women and the patient's psychological and moral characteristics. The psychiatrist's discourse suggested both symmetry and ontological equivalence between these two dimensions of sex. Overlooking the potential role of early gender assignment, education, and social environment on the patient's self-identification as male, Magnan proposed a naturalistic interpretation of the case, summed up by the expression “a male brain in a female body”. In his earlier writings on “sexual inversion”, Magnan frequently uses the above phrase and the reciprocal “female brain in a male body”, directly echoing Ulrichs’ famous “female soul in a male body”. However, in the context of the 1911 presentation, the use of this phrase appears to reflect an epistemological impasse, which results from the conjunction of the paradigms “hermaphroditism” and “sexual perversion”. In contrast, Pozzi avoided this impasse by proposing a theory that highlights the role of the patient's social environment and beliefs in the development of their sexual instinct and the formation of their identity. This theory draws on the psychological mechanism of suggestion as well as on Darwin's reflections on the domestication of animals. This perspective introduces an ontological hierarchy between organic sex and psychological sex, the latter being likened, in some cases at least, to a kind of illusion.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Our study contributes to the exploration of the historical distinction between sex and gender by revealing the gap between the views of Magnan and Pozzi and those of the pioneers of sexology and psychoanalysis. However, we have also highlighted some epistemological and ontological problems that still pervade contemporary gender medicine. In particular, these are to be found in the persistent opposition between essentialist and environmentalist approaches to gender identity, in debates around the place of medical diagnoses in gender reassignment, and in the controversies over the role of social contagion in adolescent gender dysphoria.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Medical and psychological expertise on gender remains embedded in an epistemological matrix inherited from the field of sexual medicine in the late nineteenth century. The resulting intrinsic limitations call for an in-depth reflection on the ontology of gender identity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45007,"journal":{"name":"Evolution Psychiatrique","volume":"90 3","pages":"Pages 518-535"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"« Un cerveau d’homme dans un corps de femme » : le problème du sexe « psychique » chez Valentin Magnan et Samuel Pozzi (1911)\",\"authors\":\"Mathias Winter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evopsy.2025.04.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This article explores the history of medical and psychological expertise on sex/gender identity by studying the presentation of a case of “hermaphroditism” given by the psychiatrist Valentin Magnan and the surgeon Samuel Pozzi in 1911. It examines how these authors dealt with the discrepancy between the organic and psychosocial dimensions of sex, and it highlights the epistemological and ontological problems that emerge. The article also discusses the continuing echoes in current controversies in gender medicine.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our study consists of an in-depth analysis of a presentation given to the French Academy of Medicine regarding a case of <em>“inversion du sens génital chez un pseudo-hermaphrodite féminin</em> [sexual inversion in a female pseudo-hermaphrodite]”. We conducted a detailed analysis of the minutes of the presentation, with the aim of revealing the internal logic, theoretical presuppositions, and metaphysical implications of the clinical judgements made by Magnan and Pozzi. Our primary sources include other texts by Magnan and his contemporaries on homosexuality and “sexual perversion”. Historical and epistemological studies of sex, sexuality, and hermaphroditism are used as secondary sources. Our theoretical framework draws mainly on the epistemological concepts of Kuhn and Bachelard.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The clinical observations presented by Magnan opposed the patient's organic sex, which was, despite the presence of ambiguous genitalia, unambiguously female given the histology of the patient's gonads (ovaries), and the patient's psychological sex, which was defined as male based on both the patient's sexual attraction to women and the patient's psychological and moral characteristics. The psychiatrist's discourse suggested both symmetry and ontological equivalence between these two dimensions of sex. Overlooking the potential role of early gender assignment, education, and social environment on the patient's self-identification as male, Magnan proposed a naturalistic interpretation of the case, summed up by the expression “a male brain in a female body”. In his earlier writings on “sexual inversion”, Magnan frequently uses the above phrase and the reciprocal “female brain in a male body”, directly echoing Ulrichs’ famous “female soul in a male body”. However, in the context of the 1911 presentation, the use of this phrase appears to reflect an epistemological impasse, which results from the conjunction of the paradigms “hermaphroditism” and “sexual perversion”. In contrast, Pozzi avoided this impasse by proposing a theory that highlights the role of the patient's social environment and beliefs in the development of their sexual instinct and the formation of their identity. This theory draws on the psychological mechanism of suggestion as well as on Darwin's reflections on the domestication of animals. This perspective introduces an ontological hierarchy between organic sex and psychological sex, the latter being likened, in some cases at least, to a kind of illusion.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Our study contributes to the exploration of the historical distinction between sex and gender by revealing the gap between the views of Magnan and Pozzi and those of the pioneers of sexology and psychoanalysis. However, we have also highlighted some epistemological and ontological problems that still pervade contemporary gender medicine. In particular, these are to be found in the persistent opposition between essentialist and environmentalist approaches to gender identity, in debates around the place of medical diagnoses in gender reassignment, and in the controversies over the role of social contagion in adolescent gender dysphoria.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Medical and psychological expertise on gender remains embedded in an epistemological matrix inherited from the field of sexual medicine in the late nineteenth century. The resulting intrinsic limitations call for an in-depth reflection on the ontology of gender identity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolution Psychiatrique\",\"volume\":\"90 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 518-535\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolution Psychiatrique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014385525000775\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution Psychiatrique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014385525000775","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过研究1911年精神病学家瓦伦丁·马格南和外科医生塞缪尔·波齐提出的一个“雌雄同体”案例,探讨了医学和心理学关于性别/性别认同的专业知识的历史。它考察了这些作者如何处理性别的有机和社会心理维度之间的差异,并强调了出现的认识论和本体论问题。文章还讨论了性别医学在当前争议中的持续回响。方法我们的研究包括对一份提交给法国医学科学院的报告进行深入分析,该报告涉及“女性伪雌雄同体的性反转”。我们对报告的记录进行了详细的分析,目的是揭示马格南和波齐的临床判断的内在逻辑、理论前提和形而上学含义。我们的主要资料来源包括马格南及其同时代人关于同性恋和“性变态”的其他文本。历史和认识论研究的性别,性行为,和雌雄同体被用作次要来源。我们的理论框架主要借鉴了库恩和巴舍拉的认识论概念。结果Magnan提出的临床观察反对患者的生理性别,尽管存在模糊的生殖器,但考虑到患者性腺(卵巢)的组织学,患者的性器官性别是明确的女性,而患者的心理性别是根据患者对女性的性吸引力和患者的心理和道德特征定义为男性。精神病学家的话语暗示了这两个性别维度之间的对称和本体论上的对等。Magnan忽略了早期性别分配、教育和社会环境对患者自我认同为男性的潜在作用,提出了一种自然主义的解释,用“女性身体中的男性大脑”来概括。在马格南早期关于“性反转”的著作中,他经常使用上述短语和“男性身体里的女性大脑”的相互关系,直接呼应了乌尔里希著名的“男性身体里的女性灵魂”。然而,在1911年演讲的背景下,这个短语的使用似乎反映了认识论上的僵局,这是“雌雄同体”和“性变态”范式结合的结果。相反,Pozzi通过提出一种强调患者的社会环境和信仰在性本能发展和身份形成中的作用的理论,避免了这一僵局。这一理论借鉴了暗示的心理机制以及达尔文对动物驯化的思考。这种观点在有机性和心理性之间引入了一种本体论层次,至少在某些情况下,后者被比作一种幻觉。我们的研究通过揭示马格南和波齐的观点与性学和精神分析先驱们的观点之间的差距,有助于探索性和性别之间的历史区别。然而,我们也强调了一些认识论和本体论的问题,仍然普遍存在于当代性别医学。特别是,这些都可以在性别认同的本质主义和环境主义方法之间的持续对立中找到,在关于医学诊断在性别重新分配中的地位的辩论中,以及在关于青少年性别不安的社会传染作用的争论中。关于性别的医学和心理学专业知识仍然植根于从19世纪晚期的性医学领域继承下来的认识论矩阵。由此产生的内在局限性要求我们对性别认同的本体论进行深入反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
« Un cerveau d’homme dans un corps de femme » : le problème du sexe « psychique » chez Valentin Magnan et Samuel Pozzi (1911)

Objectives

This article explores the history of medical and psychological expertise on sex/gender identity by studying the presentation of a case of “hermaphroditism” given by the psychiatrist Valentin Magnan and the surgeon Samuel Pozzi in 1911. It examines how these authors dealt with the discrepancy between the organic and psychosocial dimensions of sex, and it highlights the epistemological and ontological problems that emerge. The article also discusses the continuing echoes in current controversies in gender medicine.

Methods

Our study consists of an in-depth analysis of a presentation given to the French Academy of Medicine regarding a case of “inversion du sens génital chez un pseudo-hermaphrodite féminin [sexual inversion in a female pseudo-hermaphrodite]”. We conducted a detailed analysis of the minutes of the presentation, with the aim of revealing the internal logic, theoretical presuppositions, and metaphysical implications of the clinical judgements made by Magnan and Pozzi. Our primary sources include other texts by Magnan and his contemporaries on homosexuality and “sexual perversion”. Historical and epistemological studies of sex, sexuality, and hermaphroditism are used as secondary sources. Our theoretical framework draws mainly on the epistemological concepts of Kuhn and Bachelard.

Results

The clinical observations presented by Magnan opposed the patient's organic sex, which was, despite the presence of ambiguous genitalia, unambiguously female given the histology of the patient's gonads (ovaries), and the patient's psychological sex, which was defined as male based on both the patient's sexual attraction to women and the patient's psychological and moral characteristics. The psychiatrist's discourse suggested both symmetry and ontological equivalence between these two dimensions of sex. Overlooking the potential role of early gender assignment, education, and social environment on the patient's self-identification as male, Magnan proposed a naturalistic interpretation of the case, summed up by the expression “a male brain in a female body”. In his earlier writings on “sexual inversion”, Magnan frequently uses the above phrase and the reciprocal “female brain in a male body”, directly echoing Ulrichs’ famous “female soul in a male body”. However, in the context of the 1911 presentation, the use of this phrase appears to reflect an epistemological impasse, which results from the conjunction of the paradigms “hermaphroditism” and “sexual perversion”. In contrast, Pozzi avoided this impasse by proposing a theory that highlights the role of the patient's social environment and beliefs in the development of their sexual instinct and the formation of their identity. This theory draws on the psychological mechanism of suggestion as well as on Darwin's reflections on the domestication of animals. This perspective introduces an ontological hierarchy between organic sex and psychological sex, the latter being likened, in some cases at least, to a kind of illusion.

Discussion

Our study contributes to the exploration of the historical distinction between sex and gender by revealing the gap between the views of Magnan and Pozzi and those of the pioneers of sexology and psychoanalysis. However, we have also highlighted some epistemological and ontological problems that still pervade contemporary gender medicine. In particular, these are to be found in the persistent opposition between essentialist and environmentalist approaches to gender identity, in debates around the place of medical diagnoses in gender reassignment, and in the controversies over the role of social contagion in adolescent gender dysphoria.

Conclusion

Medical and psychological expertise on gender remains embedded in an epistemological matrix inherited from the field of sexual medicine in the late nineteenth century. The resulting intrinsic limitations call for an in-depth reflection on the ontology of gender identity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
50.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Une revue de référence pour le praticien, le chercheur et le étudiant en sciences humaines Cahiers de psychologie clinique et de psychopathologie générale fondés en 1925, Évolution psychiatrique est restée fidèle à sa mission de ouverture de la psychiatrie à tous les courants de pensée scientifique et philosophique, la recherche clinique et les réflexions critiques dans son champ comme dans les domaines connexes. Attentive à histoire de la psychiatrie autant aux dernières avancées de la recherche en biologie, en psychanalyse et en sciences sociales, la revue constitue un outil de information et une source de référence pour les praticiens, les chercheurs et les étudiants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信