在没有呼吸机的日子里:回顾几个估计

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Laurent Renard Triché, Matthieu Jabaudon, Sylvie Chevret
{"title":"在没有呼吸机的日子里:回顾几个估计","authors":"Laurent Renard Triché, Matthieu Jabaudon, Sylvie Chevret","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05593-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mortality is a critical endpoint in clinical research, but identifying meaningful differences necessitates large sample sizes. Consequently, composite outcomes such as ventilator-free days (VFDs) have been developed, combining survival and ventilation duration into a single measure. Different statistical methods used to analyse VFDs lead to different estimands. Traditionally, VFDs are treated as a count; however, some models consider time to death and time to extubation separately. This review explores the applicability of several time-to-event models and innovative approaches. The first model to consider is the competing risks approach using the Fine-Gray model. This approach focuses solely on the initial extubation event and considers death as a competing event. Second, to incorporate all extubation and reintubation events, multistate models can be employed. Specifically, the multiple-event framework, which allows for multiple transitions between intubation and extubation, while the recurrent events framework, focuses on extubation recurrence. However, these models require complete data and a sufficient number of events for analysis. Third, current ventilation-free survival estimates use methods adapted from leukaemia-free survival to evaluate the probability of remaining extubated and alive over time. Finally, the mixture cure model distinguishes between deceased and extubated individuals within the non-deceased population. It models death through logistic regression and extubation timing through survival regression among living patients. In critical care, especially for acute respiratory distress syndrome, three key states are intubation, extubation, and death. We do not advocate a one-size-fits-all model because the choice depends heavily on the specific goals. The key is to decide which estimand the study will target in the statistical plan, before initiating the study, and to ensure the analysis model is the most appropriate for addressing the research question. ","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"58 1","pages":"343"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the ventilator-free days: review of several estimands\",\"authors\":\"Laurent Renard Triché, Matthieu Jabaudon, Sylvie Chevret\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13054-025-05593-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mortality is a critical endpoint in clinical research, but identifying meaningful differences necessitates large sample sizes. Consequently, composite outcomes such as ventilator-free days (VFDs) have been developed, combining survival and ventilation duration into a single measure. Different statistical methods used to analyse VFDs lead to different estimands. Traditionally, VFDs are treated as a count; however, some models consider time to death and time to extubation separately. This review explores the applicability of several time-to-event models and innovative approaches. The first model to consider is the competing risks approach using the Fine-Gray model. This approach focuses solely on the initial extubation event and considers death as a competing event. Second, to incorporate all extubation and reintubation events, multistate models can be employed. Specifically, the multiple-event framework, which allows for multiple transitions between intubation and extubation, while the recurrent events framework, focuses on extubation recurrence. However, these models require complete data and a sufficient number of events for analysis. Third, current ventilation-free survival estimates use methods adapted from leukaemia-free survival to evaluate the probability of remaining extubated and alive over time. Finally, the mixture cure model distinguishes between deceased and extubated individuals within the non-deceased population. It models death through logistic regression and extubation timing through survival regression among living patients. In critical care, especially for acute respiratory distress syndrome, three key states are intubation, extubation, and death. We do not advocate a one-size-fits-all model because the choice depends heavily on the specific goals. The key is to decide which estimand the study will target in the statistical plan, before initiating the study, and to ensure the analysis model is the most appropriate for addressing the research question. \",\"PeriodicalId\":10811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05593-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05593-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

死亡率是临床研究的一个关键终点,但确定有意义的差异需要大样本量。因此,诸如无呼吸机天数(vfd)之类的复合结果已经开发出来,将生存和通气时间合并为单一测量。不同的统计方法用于分析vfd导致不同的估计。传统上,vfd被视为计数;然而,一些模型分别考虑死亡时间和拔管时间。这篇综述探讨了几个时间事件模型和创新方法的适用性。第一个要考虑的模型是使用Fine-Gray模型的竞争风险方法。这种方法只关注最初拔管事件,并将死亡视为竞争事件。其次,为了纳入所有拔管和再拔管事件,可以采用多状态模型。具体来说,多事件框架允许插管和拔管之间的多次过渡,而复发事件框架则侧重于拔管复发。然而,这些模型需要完整的数据和足够数量的事件进行分析。第三,目前的无通气生存评估使用的方法改编自无白血病生存来评估随着时间的推移保持拔管和存活的可能性。最后,混合治疗模型在非死亡人群中区分了死亡和拔管个体。它通过逻辑回归来模拟死亡,并通过存活患者的生存回归来模拟拔管时间。在重症监护中,特别是急性呼吸窘迫综合征,三个关键状态是插管、拔管和死亡。我们不提倡一刀切的模式,因为选择在很大程度上取决于具体的目标。关键是在开始研究之前,确定研究将在统计计划中针对哪个估计,并确保分析模型最适合解决研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond the ventilator-free days: review of several estimands
Mortality is a critical endpoint in clinical research, but identifying meaningful differences necessitates large sample sizes. Consequently, composite outcomes such as ventilator-free days (VFDs) have been developed, combining survival and ventilation duration into a single measure. Different statistical methods used to analyse VFDs lead to different estimands. Traditionally, VFDs are treated as a count; however, some models consider time to death and time to extubation separately. This review explores the applicability of several time-to-event models and innovative approaches. The first model to consider is the competing risks approach using the Fine-Gray model. This approach focuses solely on the initial extubation event and considers death as a competing event. Second, to incorporate all extubation and reintubation events, multistate models can be employed. Specifically, the multiple-event framework, which allows for multiple transitions between intubation and extubation, while the recurrent events framework, focuses on extubation recurrence. However, these models require complete data and a sufficient number of events for analysis. Third, current ventilation-free survival estimates use methods adapted from leukaemia-free survival to evaluate the probability of remaining extubated and alive over time. Finally, the mixture cure model distinguishes between deceased and extubated individuals within the non-deceased population. It models death through logistic regression and extubation timing through survival regression among living patients. In critical care, especially for acute respiratory distress syndrome, three key states are intubation, extubation, and death. We do not advocate a one-size-fits-all model because the choice depends heavily on the specific goals. The key is to decide which estimand the study will target in the statistical plan, before initiating the study, and to ensure the analysis model is the most appropriate for addressing the research question. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信