Christian S. Scheer, Djillali Annane, Antonio Artigas, Adam Linder, Michael Sander, Oktay Demirkiran, Konrad Reinhart, Evangelos J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis
{"title":"败血症患者血培养诊断的基础设施和当前实践:来自欧洲败血症护理调查的教导和建议","authors":"Christian S. Scheer, Djillali Annane, Antonio Artigas, Adam Linder, Michael Sander, Oktay Demirkiran, Konrad Reinhart, Evangelos J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05582-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recently published European Sepsis Care Survey (ESCS) by the European Sepsis Alliance (ESA) showed that the standard-of-care strategies regarding infrastructure and logistics on diagnosis and management of sepsis were beyond what is considered satisfactory. This led to a position statement by the Steering Committee of the ESA. A literature search was conducted to compare the compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines and/or other medical societies reported by the health care practitioners participating in the ESCS regarding first line fluids and vasopressors, biomarkers, continuous availability for microbiology service and antibiotic stewardship team. In all suggested practices for sepsis care the feedback of the health-care professionals who completed the ESCS showed that the average adherence was more than 80% with two exceptions: availability of microbiology diagnosis limited to 10% and antibiotic stewardship for the selection of the most appropriate antibiotic limited to 65%. ESA suggests that quality measures are applied across Europe towards the implementation of bundles for early sepsis recognition, antibiotic stewardship for sepsis patients and availability of a continuous microbiology service on a 24-hour basis including weekends for timely diagnosis. ","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"289 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infrastructure and current practice of blood culture diagnostics in patients with sepsis: teachings and recommendations from the European Sepsis Care Survey\",\"authors\":\"Christian S. Scheer, Djillali Annane, Antonio Artigas, Adam Linder, Michael Sander, Oktay Demirkiran, Konrad Reinhart, Evangelos J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13054-025-05582-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recently published European Sepsis Care Survey (ESCS) by the European Sepsis Alliance (ESA) showed that the standard-of-care strategies regarding infrastructure and logistics on diagnosis and management of sepsis were beyond what is considered satisfactory. This led to a position statement by the Steering Committee of the ESA. A literature search was conducted to compare the compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines and/or other medical societies reported by the health care practitioners participating in the ESCS regarding first line fluids and vasopressors, biomarkers, continuous availability for microbiology service and antibiotic stewardship team. In all suggested practices for sepsis care the feedback of the health-care professionals who completed the ESCS showed that the average adherence was more than 80% with two exceptions: availability of microbiology diagnosis limited to 10% and antibiotic stewardship for the selection of the most appropriate antibiotic limited to 65%. ESA suggests that quality measures are applied across Europe towards the implementation of bundles for early sepsis recognition, antibiotic stewardship for sepsis patients and availability of a continuous microbiology service on a 24-hour basis including weekends for timely diagnosis. \",\"PeriodicalId\":10811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"289 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05582-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05582-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Infrastructure and current practice of blood culture diagnostics in patients with sepsis: teachings and recommendations from the European Sepsis Care Survey
The recently published European Sepsis Care Survey (ESCS) by the European Sepsis Alliance (ESA) showed that the standard-of-care strategies regarding infrastructure and logistics on diagnosis and management of sepsis were beyond what is considered satisfactory. This led to a position statement by the Steering Committee of the ESA. A literature search was conducted to compare the compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines and/or other medical societies reported by the health care practitioners participating in the ESCS regarding first line fluids and vasopressors, biomarkers, continuous availability for microbiology service and antibiotic stewardship team. In all suggested practices for sepsis care the feedback of the health-care professionals who completed the ESCS showed that the average adherence was more than 80% with two exceptions: availability of microbiology diagnosis limited to 10% and antibiotic stewardship for the selection of the most appropriate antibiotic limited to 65%. ESA suggests that quality measures are applied across Europe towards the implementation of bundles for early sepsis recognition, antibiotic stewardship for sepsis patients and availability of a continuous microbiology service on a 24-hour basis including weekends for timely diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.