超越血脑屏障破坏和分子量:S100B和NSE对心脏骤停后神经系统预后的室室动力学

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
So-Young Jeon, Changshin Kang, Yenho You, Jung Soo Park, Jin Hgon Min, Wonjoon Jeong, Hyun Shik Ryu, Jiyoung Choi, Byung Kook Lee
{"title":"超越血脑屏障破坏和分子量:S100B和NSE对心脏骤停后神经系统预后的室室动力学","authors":"So-Young Jeon, Changshin Kang, Yenho You, Jung Soo Park, Jin Hgon Min, Wonjoon Jeong, Hyun Shik Ryu, Jiyoung Choi, Byung Kook Lee","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05572-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prognostic value of serum biomarkers after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) depends on timing, but the physiological basis remains unclear. We investigated whether blood–brain barrier (BBB) integrity and biomarker-specific properties explain the time-dependent differences in prognostic performance. This retrospective study included comatose adult OHCA survivors who underwent paired serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) measurements of neuron-specific enolase (NSE; 47 kDa) and S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B; 21 kDa) at 0 (H0), 24 (H24), 48 (H48), and 72 (H72) h after return of spontaneous circulation. BBB disruption was assessed using the CSF/serum albumin quotient (QA). Prognostic performance was assessed using AUC analysis for 6-month poor neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category 3–5). Among 111 patients (59% poor outcome), 646 serum and 620 CSF samples were analyzed. BBB disruption was more severe in the poor outcome group at all timepoints (all P < 0.001), peaking at H24 (QA 0.0282 [IQR 0.0150–0.120]) and remaining elevated at H72 (0.0228 [IQR 0.0147–0.0598]). In the poor outcome group, serum S100B levels peaked at H0 (0.80 ng/mL [IQR 0.39–2.81]) and declined despite a persistent elevation in CSF levels at or above the upper detection limit (≥ 30 ng/mL). Conversely, NSE levels progressively increased in both compartments, with serum and CSF levels increasing in parallel over time. Serum NSE concentrations showed a time-dependent improvement in prognostic accuracy, peaking at H72 (AUC 0.88), whereas S100B concentrations maintained stable performance across all timepoints (AUCs 0.79–0.85, all P > 0.4). Notably, the prognostic performance of S100B remained relatively consistent regardless of BBB disruption severity, whereas NSE showed progressively improved predictive accuracy with increased BBB disruption. Across all timepoints, CSF biomarkers—particularly S100B and NSE—showed consistently higher AUCs than serum, suggesting superior prognostic utility. Serum NSE levels closely reflect the degree of BBB disruption and CSF levels, while S100B exhibits a transient early-phase profile, with decreased serum detectability over time, even in the presence of sustained CSF elevation or severe BBB disruption. These findings highlight the importance of interpreting biomarker kinetics across compartments and timepoints rather than relying on molecular weight or BBB status alone.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"726 1","pages":"342"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond blood-brain barrier disruption and molecular weight: compartmental kinetics of S100B and NSE for neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest\",\"authors\":\"So-Young Jeon, Changshin Kang, Yenho You, Jung Soo Park, Jin Hgon Min, Wonjoon Jeong, Hyun Shik Ryu, Jiyoung Choi, Byung Kook Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13054-025-05572-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The prognostic value of serum biomarkers after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) depends on timing, but the physiological basis remains unclear. We investigated whether blood–brain barrier (BBB) integrity and biomarker-specific properties explain the time-dependent differences in prognostic performance. This retrospective study included comatose adult OHCA survivors who underwent paired serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) measurements of neuron-specific enolase (NSE; 47 kDa) and S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B; 21 kDa) at 0 (H0), 24 (H24), 48 (H48), and 72 (H72) h after return of spontaneous circulation. BBB disruption was assessed using the CSF/serum albumin quotient (QA). Prognostic performance was assessed using AUC analysis for 6-month poor neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category 3–5). Among 111 patients (59% poor outcome), 646 serum and 620 CSF samples were analyzed. BBB disruption was more severe in the poor outcome group at all timepoints (all P < 0.001), peaking at H24 (QA 0.0282 [IQR 0.0150–0.120]) and remaining elevated at H72 (0.0228 [IQR 0.0147–0.0598]). In the poor outcome group, serum S100B levels peaked at H0 (0.80 ng/mL [IQR 0.39–2.81]) and declined despite a persistent elevation in CSF levels at or above the upper detection limit (≥ 30 ng/mL). Conversely, NSE levels progressively increased in both compartments, with serum and CSF levels increasing in parallel over time. Serum NSE concentrations showed a time-dependent improvement in prognostic accuracy, peaking at H72 (AUC 0.88), whereas S100B concentrations maintained stable performance across all timepoints (AUCs 0.79–0.85, all P > 0.4). Notably, the prognostic performance of S100B remained relatively consistent regardless of BBB disruption severity, whereas NSE showed progressively improved predictive accuracy with increased BBB disruption. Across all timepoints, CSF biomarkers—particularly S100B and NSE—showed consistently higher AUCs than serum, suggesting superior prognostic utility. Serum NSE levels closely reflect the degree of BBB disruption and CSF levels, while S100B exhibits a transient early-phase profile, with decreased serum detectability over time, even in the presence of sustained CSF elevation or severe BBB disruption. These findings highlight the importance of interpreting biomarker kinetics across compartments and timepoints rather than relying on molecular weight or BBB status alone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"726 1\",\"pages\":\"342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05572-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05572-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后血清生物标志物的预后价值取决于时间,但生理基础尚不清楚。我们研究了血脑屏障(BBB)完整性和生物标志物特异性是否解释了预后表现的时间依赖性差异。这项回顾性研究纳入了昏迷的成年OHCA幸存者,他们接受了成对的血清和脑脊液(CSF)测量神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE;47 kDa)和S100钙结合蛋白B (S100B;21 kDa)在0 (H0), 24 (H24), 48 (H48)和72 (H72) h后恢复自发循环。采用CSF/血清白蛋白商(QA)评估血脑屏障破坏情况。使用AUC分析对6个月不良神经预后进行评估(脑功能分类3-5)。在111例患者(59%预后不良)中,分析了646份血清和620份脑脊液样本。在所有时间点,不良结局组的血脑屏障破坏更为严重(P均为0.4)。值得注意的是,无论血脑屏障破坏程度如何,S100B的预后表现保持相对一致,而NSE的预测准确性随着血脑屏障破坏程度的增加而逐渐提高。在所有时间点上,脑脊液生物标志物(尤其是S100B和nse)的auc均高于血清,这表明脑脊液具有更好的预后价值。血清NSE水平密切反映血脑屏障破坏程度和脑脊液水平,而S100B表现出短暂的早期特征,随着时间的推移血清可检测性降低,即使存在持续的脑脊液升高或严重的血脑屏障破坏。这些发现强调了跨区室和时间点解释生物标志物动力学的重要性,而不是仅仅依赖于分子量或血脑屏障状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond blood-brain barrier disruption and molecular weight: compartmental kinetics of S100B and NSE for neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest
The prognostic value of serum biomarkers after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) depends on timing, but the physiological basis remains unclear. We investigated whether blood–brain barrier (BBB) integrity and biomarker-specific properties explain the time-dependent differences in prognostic performance. This retrospective study included comatose adult OHCA survivors who underwent paired serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) measurements of neuron-specific enolase (NSE; 47 kDa) and S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B; 21 kDa) at 0 (H0), 24 (H24), 48 (H48), and 72 (H72) h after return of spontaneous circulation. BBB disruption was assessed using the CSF/serum albumin quotient (QA). Prognostic performance was assessed using AUC analysis for 6-month poor neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category 3–5). Among 111 patients (59% poor outcome), 646 serum and 620 CSF samples were analyzed. BBB disruption was more severe in the poor outcome group at all timepoints (all P < 0.001), peaking at H24 (QA 0.0282 [IQR 0.0150–0.120]) and remaining elevated at H72 (0.0228 [IQR 0.0147–0.0598]). In the poor outcome group, serum S100B levels peaked at H0 (0.80 ng/mL [IQR 0.39–2.81]) and declined despite a persistent elevation in CSF levels at or above the upper detection limit (≥ 30 ng/mL). Conversely, NSE levels progressively increased in both compartments, with serum and CSF levels increasing in parallel over time. Serum NSE concentrations showed a time-dependent improvement in prognostic accuracy, peaking at H72 (AUC 0.88), whereas S100B concentrations maintained stable performance across all timepoints (AUCs 0.79–0.85, all P > 0.4). Notably, the prognostic performance of S100B remained relatively consistent regardless of BBB disruption severity, whereas NSE showed progressively improved predictive accuracy with increased BBB disruption. Across all timepoints, CSF biomarkers—particularly S100B and NSE—showed consistently higher AUCs than serum, suggesting superior prognostic utility. Serum NSE levels closely reflect the degree of BBB disruption and CSF levels, while S100B exhibits a transient early-phase profile, with decreased serum detectability over time, even in the presence of sustained CSF elevation or severe BBB disruption. These findings highlight the importance of interpreting biomarker kinetics across compartments and timepoints rather than relying on molecular weight or BBB status alone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信