门诊造口术130例。来自grecar多中心研究的见解。

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Boris Cleret de Langavant,Antoine Camerlo,Quentin Denost,Laura Beyer-Berjot,Maxime Collard,Yann Parc,Benoit Gignoux,Jérémie H Lefevre
{"title":"门诊造口术130例。来自grecar多中心研究的见解。","authors":"Boris Cleret de Langavant,Antoine Camerlo,Quentin Denost,Laura Beyer-Berjot,Maxime Collard,Yann Parc,Benoit Gignoux,Jérémie H Lefevre","doi":"10.1097/sla.0000000000006875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nevaluate feasibility and outcomes of outpatient stoma closure.\r\n\r\nBACKGROUND\r\nStoma closure is a routine procedure still associated with prolonged hospital stays, despite a low complication rate. We hypothesized that it could be performed in an outpatient setting.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis retrospective observational study analyzed prospectively collected data on outpatient stoma closures across 5 centers (5/2019-10/2024) was conducted. Inclusion required a caregiver on surgery day and no associated procedures. Follow-up consisted of phone consultations, a 24/7 emergency contact line, and routine outpatient appointment.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n130 patients (57% male, median age=60 y, ASA score 1-2=94%) were included. 122 loop ileostomies (94%), 5 loop colostomies (4%) and 3 ileocolostomies(3%) were closed. Stoma had been performed mainly after anterior resection (81%) or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (9%). The median interval before stoma closure was 70 days [7-2310]. Median operative time was 48 minutes [20-247]. Anastomosis was mainly stapled (55.4%). Wounds were closed either directly (56%) or with a purse-string technique (44%). Same-day discharge was possible for 90% of patients. Main reasons for admission were postoperative pain (n=5) and logistical issues (n=4). Median length of hospital stay was 10 hours.[4-16] 21 patients (16%) were readmitted after a median time of 6 days [1-14] (ileus=9, parietal abscess=5). Severe morbidity (Dindo III) was 3%. Direct wound closure was a risk factor of wound infection (P=0.009). Steroid therapy was a risk factor of morbidity and readmission (P<0.001).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOutpatient stoma closure is a safe and effective approach with low complication and readmission rates when using appropriate protocols.","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outpatient Stoma Closure in 130 Patients. Insights From the GRECCAR Multicentric Study.\",\"authors\":\"Boris Cleret de Langavant,Antoine Camerlo,Quentin Denost,Laura Beyer-Berjot,Maxime Collard,Yann Parc,Benoit Gignoux,Jérémie H Lefevre\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/sla.0000000000006875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nevaluate feasibility and outcomes of outpatient stoma closure.\\r\\n\\r\\nBACKGROUND\\r\\nStoma closure is a routine procedure still associated with prolonged hospital stays, despite a low complication rate. We hypothesized that it could be performed in an outpatient setting.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThis retrospective observational study analyzed prospectively collected data on outpatient stoma closures across 5 centers (5/2019-10/2024) was conducted. Inclusion required a caregiver on surgery day and no associated procedures. Follow-up consisted of phone consultations, a 24/7 emergency contact line, and routine outpatient appointment.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\n130 patients (57% male, median age=60 y, ASA score 1-2=94%) were included. 122 loop ileostomies (94%), 5 loop colostomies (4%) and 3 ileocolostomies(3%) were closed. Stoma had been performed mainly after anterior resection (81%) or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (9%). The median interval before stoma closure was 70 days [7-2310]. Median operative time was 48 minutes [20-247]. Anastomosis was mainly stapled (55.4%). Wounds were closed either directly (56%) or with a purse-string technique (44%). Same-day discharge was possible for 90% of patients. Main reasons for admission were postoperative pain (n=5) and logistical issues (n=4). Median length of hospital stay was 10 hours.[4-16] 21 patients (16%) were readmitted after a median time of 6 days [1-14] (ileus=9, parietal abscess=5). Severe morbidity (Dindo III) was 3%. Direct wound closure was a risk factor of wound infection (P=0.009). Steroid therapy was a risk factor of morbidity and readmission (P<0.001).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nOutpatient stoma closure is a safe and effective approach with low complication and readmission rates when using appropriate protocols.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006875\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006875","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价门诊造口术的可行性及效果。背景:尽管并发症发生率低,造口闭合仍是一种常规手术,但仍与延长住院时间有关。我们假设它可以在门诊环境中进行。方法本回顾性观察性研究对5个中心(2019年5月- 2024年10月)门诊造口闭合数据进行前瞻性分析。纳入手术当天需要一名护理人员,无需相关程序。随访包括电话咨询、24/7紧急联系热线和常规门诊预约。结果纳入130例患者,其中男性57%,中位年龄60岁,ASA评分1-2=94%。回肠袢造瘘122例(94%),回肠袢造瘘5例(4%),回肠结肠造瘘3例(3%)。造口主要在前切除术(81%)或回肠袋-肛门吻合术(9%)后进行。造口前中位间隔为70 d[7-2310]。中位手术时间为48分钟[20-247]。吻合术以吻合器为主(55.4%)。伤口直接缝合(56%)或使用荷包缝合(44%)。90%的患者可以在同一天出院。入院的主要原因是术后疼痛(n=5)和后勤问题(n=4)。住院时间中位数为10小时。[4-16] 21例(16%)患者在中位时间6天后再次入院[1-14](肠梗阻=9,顶壁脓肿=5)。重度发病率(Dindo III)为3%。直接缝合是伤口感染的危险因素(P=0.009)。类固醇治疗是发病率和再入院的危险因素(P<0.001)。结论门诊造口术是一种安全有效的方法,并发症少,再入院率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outpatient Stoma Closure in 130 Patients. Insights From the GRECCAR Multicentric Study.
OBJECTIVE evaluate feasibility and outcomes of outpatient stoma closure. BACKGROUND Stoma closure is a routine procedure still associated with prolonged hospital stays, despite a low complication rate. We hypothesized that it could be performed in an outpatient setting. METHODS This retrospective observational study analyzed prospectively collected data on outpatient stoma closures across 5 centers (5/2019-10/2024) was conducted. Inclusion required a caregiver on surgery day and no associated procedures. Follow-up consisted of phone consultations, a 24/7 emergency contact line, and routine outpatient appointment. RESULTS 130 patients (57% male, median age=60 y, ASA score 1-2=94%) were included. 122 loop ileostomies (94%), 5 loop colostomies (4%) and 3 ileocolostomies(3%) were closed. Stoma had been performed mainly after anterior resection (81%) or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (9%). The median interval before stoma closure was 70 days [7-2310]. Median operative time was 48 minutes [20-247]. Anastomosis was mainly stapled (55.4%). Wounds were closed either directly (56%) or with a purse-string technique (44%). Same-day discharge was possible for 90% of patients. Main reasons for admission were postoperative pain (n=5) and logistical issues (n=4). Median length of hospital stay was 10 hours.[4-16] 21 patients (16%) were readmitted after a median time of 6 days [1-14] (ileus=9, parietal abscess=5). Severe morbidity (Dindo III) was 3%. Direct wound closure was a risk factor of wound infection (P=0.009). Steroid therapy was a risk factor of morbidity and readmission (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Outpatient stoma closure is a safe and effective approach with low complication and readmission rates when using appropriate protocols.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信