PROMIS和ODI工具:小儿背痛患者MRI异常表现的临床有用标记。

Devan Devkumar,Karina Zapata,Yuhan Ma,Chan-Hee Jo,Brandon Ramo
{"title":"PROMIS和ODI工具:小儿背痛患者MRI异常表现的临床有用标记。","authors":"Devan Devkumar,Karina Zapata,Yuhan Ma,Chan-Hee Jo,Brandon Ramo","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.01404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThis study was performed to determine if the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), the 9-item Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-9), and back pain intensity predict abnormal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in pediatric patients with back pain.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe performed a retrospective review from April 2021 to June 2023 of 300 children (200 girls and 100 boys) aged 5 to 18 years with caregiver-reported back pain who underwent MRI of the spine and had completed the PROMIS Pediatric computerized adaptive testing measures for Pain Interference, Mobility, and Anxiety and the ODI-9, and had rated back pain intensity on a scale ranging from 0 to 5. Patients were excluded if they had neuromuscular or syndromic scoliosis, a history of previous spinal surgeries, or isolated neck pain. MRI findings were grouped as non-spinal and spinal findings, and then categorized into subgroups as incidental, correlative, and causative findings. Incidental findings were considered those in children with normal MRI findings. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared between children with normal and abnormal MRI findings (defined by the presence of correlative and/or causative findings) with use of Mann-Whitney U tests and logistic regression analysis.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf the 300 children, 126 (42%) had abnormal MRI findings and 174 (58%) had normal MRI findings. Lower PROMIS Mobility scores (39.2 versus 42.8, p = 0.001) and higher ODI-9 percentages (27.4 versus 23.3, p = 0.015) were associated with abnormal MRI findings. A PROMIS Mobility threshold of 40.5 and an ODI percentage threshold of 21.1 were optimal for predicting abnormal MRI findings. We did not find an association between PROMIS Anxiety, PROMIS Pain Interference, or pain intensity with abnormal MRI findings.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nLower PROMIS Mobility scores and higher ODI-9 scores, which reflect worsening functional disability, were associated with abnormal MRI findings in pediatric patients with back pain. Additionally, the minimum clinically important difference was met for the PROMIS Mobility score between those with normal and abnormal MRI.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nPrognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PROMIS and ODI Tools: Clinically Useful Markers of Abnormal MRI Findings in Pediatric Patients with Back Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Devan Devkumar,Karina Zapata,Yuhan Ma,Chan-Hee Jo,Brandon Ramo\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/jbjs.24.01404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nThis study was performed to determine if the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), the 9-item Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-9), and back pain intensity predict abnormal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in pediatric patients with back pain.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe performed a retrospective review from April 2021 to June 2023 of 300 children (200 girls and 100 boys) aged 5 to 18 years with caregiver-reported back pain who underwent MRI of the spine and had completed the PROMIS Pediatric computerized adaptive testing measures for Pain Interference, Mobility, and Anxiety and the ODI-9, and had rated back pain intensity on a scale ranging from 0 to 5. Patients were excluded if they had neuromuscular or syndromic scoliosis, a history of previous spinal surgeries, or isolated neck pain. MRI findings were grouped as non-spinal and spinal findings, and then categorized into subgroups as incidental, correlative, and causative findings. Incidental findings were considered those in children with normal MRI findings. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared between children with normal and abnormal MRI findings (defined by the presence of correlative and/or causative findings) with use of Mann-Whitney U tests and logistic regression analysis.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nOf the 300 children, 126 (42%) had abnormal MRI findings and 174 (58%) had normal MRI findings. Lower PROMIS Mobility scores (39.2 versus 42.8, p = 0.001) and higher ODI-9 percentages (27.4 versus 23.3, p = 0.015) were associated with abnormal MRI findings. A PROMIS Mobility threshold of 40.5 and an ODI percentage threshold of 21.1 were optimal for predicting abnormal MRI findings. We did not find an association between PROMIS Anxiety, PROMIS Pain Interference, or pain intensity with abnormal MRI findings.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nLower PROMIS Mobility scores and higher ODI-9 scores, which reflect worsening functional disability, were associated with abnormal MRI findings in pediatric patients with back pain. Additionally, the minimum clinically important difference was met for the PROMIS Mobility score between those with normal and abnormal MRI.\\r\\n\\r\\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\\r\\nPrognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.01404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.01404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)、9项Oswestry残疾指数(ODI-9)和背痛强度是否能预测小儿背痛患者的异常磁共振成像(MRI)结果。方法:我们从2021年4月至2023年6月对300名5至18岁的儿童(200名女孩和100名男孩)进行了回顾性研究,这些儿童由护理者报告背痛,接受了脊柱MRI检查,完成了PROMIS儿科疼痛干扰、活动能力和焦虑的计算机化适应性测试以及ODI-9,并对背痛强度进行了评分,评分范围从0到5。如果患者患有神经肌肉或综合征性脊柱侧凸,既往脊柱手术史或孤立性颈部疼痛,则排除在外。MRI表现分为非脊柱和脊柱表现,然后分为偶发、相关和病因表现亚组。偶然发现被认为是那些在正常的儿童MRI检查结果。采用Mann-Whitney U检验和logistic回归分析,比较患者报告的预后指标(PROMs)在MRI表现正常和异常(由相关和/或病因表现定义)的儿童之间的差异。结果300例患儿中MRI异常126例(42%),MRI正常174例(58%)。较低的PROMIS活动度评分(39.2比42.8,p = 0.001)和较高的ODI-9百分比(27.4比23.3,p = 0.015)与MRI异常表现相关。PROMIS活动性阈值40.5和ODI百分比阈值21.1是预测异常MRI表现的最佳值。我们没有发现PROMIS焦虑、PROMIS疼痛干扰或疼痛强度与异常MRI结果之间的关联。结论:小儿背痛患者的PROMIS活动能力评分较低、ODI-9评分较高与MRI异常表现相关,这反映了功能障碍的恶化。此外,在MRI正常和异常的患者之间,PROMIS活动评分达到了最小的临床重要差异。证据水平:预后III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PROMIS and ODI Tools: Clinically Useful Markers of Abnormal MRI Findings in Pediatric Patients with Back Pain.
BACKGROUND This study was performed to determine if the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), the 9-item Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-9), and back pain intensity predict abnormal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in pediatric patients with back pain. METHODS We performed a retrospective review from April 2021 to June 2023 of 300 children (200 girls and 100 boys) aged 5 to 18 years with caregiver-reported back pain who underwent MRI of the spine and had completed the PROMIS Pediatric computerized adaptive testing measures for Pain Interference, Mobility, and Anxiety and the ODI-9, and had rated back pain intensity on a scale ranging from 0 to 5. Patients were excluded if they had neuromuscular or syndromic scoliosis, a history of previous spinal surgeries, or isolated neck pain. MRI findings were grouped as non-spinal and spinal findings, and then categorized into subgroups as incidental, correlative, and causative findings. Incidental findings were considered those in children with normal MRI findings. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared between children with normal and abnormal MRI findings (defined by the presence of correlative and/or causative findings) with use of Mann-Whitney U tests and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Of the 300 children, 126 (42%) had abnormal MRI findings and 174 (58%) had normal MRI findings. Lower PROMIS Mobility scores (39.2 versus 42.8, p = 0.001) and higher ODI-9 percentages (27.4 versus 23.3, p = 0.015) were associated with abnormal MRI findings. A PROMIS Mobility threshold of 40.5 and an ODI percentage threshold of 21.1 were optimal for predicting abnormal MRI findings. We did not find an association between PROMIS Anxiety, PROMIS Pain Interference, or pain intensity with abnormal MRI findings. CONCLUSIONS Lower PROMIS Mobility scores and higher ODI-9 scores, which reflect worsening functional disability, were associated with abnormal MRI findings in pediatric patients with back pain. Additionally, the minimum clinically important difference was met for the PROMIS Mobility score between those with normal and abnormal MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信