Mackenzie M Mayhew,Nidhi Kuchimanchi,Justin Lee,Elizabeth J Olecki,Jacob Sellers,Craig L Slingluff,Allan Tsung,Russell G Witt
{"title":"在哪里接受培训很重要:在资金雄厚的机构中接受培训的外科医生不成比例。","authors":"Mackenzie M Mayhew,Nidhi Kuchimanchi,Justin Lee,Elizabeth J Olecki,Jacob Sellers,Craig L Slingluff,Allan Tsung,Russell G Witt","doi":"10.1097/sla.0000000000006880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo assess the distribution of National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded surgeon-scientists by residency training institution and to examine whether training at institutions with higher NIH funding is associated with greater individual NIH funding.\r\n\r\nSUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA\r\nSurgeon-scientists face challenges securing NIH funding, with surgical research funding lagging behind other fields. Training in resource-rich environments may enhance research engagement and funding success.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nBlue Ridge Institute for Medical Research (BRIMR) rankings were used to identify NIH-funded principal investigators (NIH-PIs) among surgeons in Departments of Surgery from 2013-2023. Residency program NIH-funding quartiles, and top-ten programs, were determined by averaging institutional funding from BRIMR spreadsheets. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, nonparametric tests, Z-tests, and linear regression were performed.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAmong 559 NIH-funded surgeon-scientists, 394 (70.5%) trained at first-quartile institutions, representing 75-82% of NIH-PIs annually and receiving 79-85% of total funding each year. Total annual funding was significantly higher among first-quartile trained NIH-PIs ($117.9 vs. $24.8 million; P <0.0001), though median funding per NIH-PI did not differ ($354,544 vs. $328,179; P =0.358). In subgroup analysis, top-ten trained NIH-PIs had higher median funding per PI ($379,407 vs. $322,666; P =0.013) and experienced faster annual growth in funding per PI ($61,920/year vs. $38,666/year, P =0.009) even when adjusted for current affiliated institution funding quartile. Additionally, top-ten trained PIs exhibited greater scientific influence measured by the NIH iCite tool's weighted relative citation ratio (119 vs. 100; P =0.034).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nSurgeon-scientists who trained at first-quartile institutions represent the majority of NIH-funded investigators, highlighting the potential influence of training in well-funded environments.","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":"147 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where You Train Matters: Surgeon-Scientists Disproportionately Trained at Highly Funded Institutions.\",\"authors\":\"Mackenzie M Mayhew,Nidhi Kuchimanchi,Justin Lee,Elizabeth J Olecki,Jacob Sellers,Craig L Slingluff,Allan Tsung,Russell G Witt\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/sla.0000000000006880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nTo assess the distribution of National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded surgeon-scientists by residency training institution and to examine whether training at institutions with higher NIH funding is associated with greater individual NIH funding.\\r\\n\\r\\nSUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA\\r\\nSurgeon-scientists face challenges securing NIH funding, with surgical research funding lagging behind other fields. Training in resource-rich environments may enhance research engagement and funding success.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nBlue Ridge Institute for Medical Research (BRIMR) rankings were used to identify NIH-funded principal investigators (NIH-PIs) among surgeons in Departments of Surgery from 2013-2023. Residency program NIH-funding quartiles, and top-ten programs, were determined by averaging institutional funding from BRIMR spreadsheets. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, nonparametric tests, Z-tests, and linear regression were performed.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nAmong 559 NIH-funded surgeon-scientists, 394 (70.5%) trained at first-quartile institutions, representing 75-82% of NIH-PIs annually and receiving 79-85% of total funding each year. Total annual funding was significantly higher among first-quartile trained NIH-PIs ($117.9 vs. $24.8 million; P <0.0001), though median funding per NIH-PI did not differ ($354,544 vs. $328,179; P =0.358). In subgroup analysis, top-ten trained NIH-PIs had higher median funding per PI ($379,407 vs. $322,666; P =0.013) and experienced faster annual growth in funding per PI ($61,920/year vs. $38,666/year, P =0.009) even when adjusted for current affiliated institution funding quartile. Additionally, top-ten trained PIs exhibited greater scientific influence measured by the NIH iCite tool's weighted relative citation ratio (119 vs. 100; P =0.034).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nSurgeon-scientists who trained at first-quartile institutions represent the majority of NIH-funded investigators, highlighting the potential influence of training in well-funded environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"volume\":\"147 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006880\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006880","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Where You Train Matters: Surgeon-Scientists Disproportionately Trained at Highly Funded Institutions.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the distribution of National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded surgeon-scientists by residency training institution and to examine whether training at institutions with higher NIH funding is associated with greater individual NIH funding.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA
Surgeon-scientists face challenges securing NIH funding, with surgical research funding lagging behind other fields. Training in resource-rich environments may enhance research engagement and funding success.
METHODS
Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research (BRIMR) rankings were used to identify NIH-funded principal investigators (NIH-PIs) among surgeons in Departments of Surgery from 2013-2023. Residency program NIH-funding quartiles, and top-ten programs, were determined by averaging institutional funding from BRIMR spreadsheets. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, nonparametric tests, Z-tests, and linear regression were performed.
RESULTS
Among 559 NIH-funded surgeon-scientists, 394 (70.5%) trained at first-quartile institutions, representing 75-82% of NIH-PIs annually and receiving 79-85% of total funding each year. Total annual funding was significantly higher among first-quartile trained NIH-PIs ($117.9 vs. $24.8 million; P <0.0001), though median funding per NIH-PI did not differ ($354,544 vs. $328,179; P =0.358). In subgroup analysis, top-ten trained NIH-PIs had higher median funding per PI ($379,407 vs. $322,666; P =0.013) and experienced faster annual growth in funding per PI ($61,920/year vs. $38,666/year, P =0.009) even when adjusted for current affiliated institution funding quartile. Additionally, top-ten trained PIs exhibited greater scientific influence measured by the NIH iCite tool's weighted relative citation ratio (119 vs. 100; P =0.034).
CONCLUSION
Surgeon-scientists who trained at first-quartile institutions represent the majority of NIH-funded investigators, highlighting the potential influence of training in well-funded environments.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.