Paolo Iovino, Ilaria Marcomini, Marco DI Nitto, Valeria Caponnetto, Yari Longobucco, Valentina Vanzi, Francesco Zaghini, Rosaria Alvaro, Alessandra Burgio, Stefano Domenico Cicala, Giancarlo Cicolini, Loreto Lancia, Paolo Landa, Duilio Fiorenzo Manara, Beatrice Mazzoleni, Laura Rasero, Gennaro Rocco, Maurizio Zega, Loredana Sasso, Annamaria Bagnasco
{"title":"家庭保健调查中消费者对医疗服务提供者和系统的评估(HHCAHPS)工具的效度和信度:一项多中心横断面研究。","authors":"Paolo Iovino, Ilaria Marcomini, Marco DI Nitto, Valeria Caponnetto, Yari Longobucco, Valentina Vanzi, Francesco Zaghini, Rosaria Alvaro, Alessandra Burgio, Stefano Domenico Cicala, Giancarlo Cicolini, Loreto Lancia, Paolo Landa, Duilio Fiorenzo Manara, Beatrice Mazzoleni, Laura Rasero, Gennaro Rocco, Maurizio Zega, Loredana Sasso, Annamaria Bagnasco","doi":"10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2025.66.1.3526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to investigate the psychometric properties of the Home Health Care Survey of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and System (HHCAHPS) in the Italian context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of data from the AIDOMUS-IT study. A total of 9,780 patients cared for by home healthcare services completed the HHCAHPS along with a measure of satisfaction for the care received. Structural validity was assessed with a confirmatory analytical approach (CFA). Construct validity was ascertained via hypothesis testing (convergent validity) by correlating the HHCAHPS scores with the scores derived from the measure of patient satisfaction for care. Internal consistency was assessed with the Omega (ω) coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Structural validity was confirmed, with satisfactory fit indices of the CFA model specified according to the conceptualized three-factor structure (\"care of patients\", \"communication with the providers\", and \"specific care issues\"). Construct validity was confirmed with moderate correlations between the level of satisfaction for care and the factors \"communication with the providers\" (r = 0.39, p < 0.001), \"care of patients\" (r = 0.34, p < 0.001), and \"specific care issues\" (r = 0.19, p < 0.001). Internal consistency was satisfactory for the \"specific care issues\" factor (ω = 0.81), while it was at the threshold of acceptability for the other factors (ω = 0.60-0.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that the HHCAHPS is valid and sufficiently reliable when tested on the Italian population. Therefore, this tool can be supportive for promoting research and designing interventions to promote patient-centered care within home healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94106,"journal":{"name":"Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene","volume":"66 1","pages":"E102-E109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of the Home Health Care Survey of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and System (HHCAHPS) tool: a multicentre cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Iovino, Ilaria Marcomini, Marco DI Nitto, Valeria Caponnetto, Yari Longobucco, Valentina Vanzi, Francesco Zaghini, Rosaria Alvaro, Alessandra Burgio, Stefano Domenico Cicala, Giancarlo Cicolini, Loreto Lancia, Paolo Landa, Duilio Fiorenzo Manara, Beatrice Mazzoleni, Laura Rasero, Gennaro Rocco, Maurizio Zega, Loredana Sasso, Annamaria Bagnasco\",\"doi\":\"10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2025.66.1.3526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to investigate the psychometric properties of the Home Health Care Survey of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and System (HHCAHPS) in the Italian context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of data from the AIDOMUS-IT study. A total of 9,780 patients cared for by home healthcare services completed the HHCAHPS along with a measure of satisfaction for the care received. Structural validity was assessed with a confirmatory analytical approach (CFA). Construct validity was ascertained via hypothesis testing (convergent validity) by correlating the HHCAHPS scores with the scores derived from the measure of patient satisfaction for care. Internal consistency was assessed with the Omega (ω) coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Structural validity was confirmed, with satisfactory fit indices of the CFA model specified according to the conceptualized three-factor structure (\\\"care of patients\\\", \\\"communication with the providers\\\", and \\\"specific care issues\\\"). Construct validity was confirmed with moderate correlations between the level of satisfaction for care and the factors \\\"communication with the providers\\\" (r = 0.39, p < 0.001), \\\"care of patients\\\" (r = 0.34, p < 0.001), and \\\"specific care issues\\\" (r = 0.19, p < 0.001). Internal consistency was satisfactory for the \\\"specific care issues\\\" factor (ω = 0.81), while it was at the threshold of acceptability for the other factors (ω = 0.60-0.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that the HHCAHPS is valid and sufficiently reliable when tested on the Italian population. Therefore, this tool can be supportive for promoting research and designing interventions to promote patient-centered care within home healthcare settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"E102-E109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312711/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2025.66.1.3526\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2025.66.1.3526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
前言:本研究旨在调查意大利家庭卫生保健调查中消费者对卫生保健提供者和系统的评估(HHCAHPS)的心理测量学特征。方法:这是对AIDOMUS-IT研究数据的二次分析。共有9,780名由家居健康护理服务照顾的病人完成了“家庭健康护理服务计划”,并对所获照顾感到满意。采用验证性分析方法(CFA)评估结构效度。建构效度通过假设检验(收敛效度)来确定,方法是将HHCAHPS得分与患者护理满意度得分相关联。内部一致性用ω (ω)系数评估。结果:结构效度得到证实,根据概念化的三因素结构(“患者护理”、“与提供者沟通”和“具体护理问题”)确定的CFA模型拟合指标令人满意。建构效度证实护理满意度与“与提供者沟通”(r = 0.39, p < 0.001)、“对病人的照顾”(r = 0.34, p < 0.001)和“具体护理问题”(r = 0.19, p < 0.001)之间存在中度相关。“特殊护理问题”因子的内部一致性令人满意(ω = 0.81),而其他因子的内部一致性处于可接受的阈值(ω = 0.60-0.62)。结论:本研究表明HHCAHPS在意大利人群中测试是有效和足够可靠的。因此,该工具可以支持促进研究和设计干预措施,以促进家庭医疗保健环境中以患者为中心的护理。
Validity and reliability of the Home Health Care Survey of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and System (HHCAHPS) tool: a multicentre cross-sectional study.
Introduction: This study aims to investigate the psychometric properties of the Home Health Care Survey of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and System (HHCAHPS) in the Italian context.
Methods: This is a secondary analysis of data from the AIDOMUS-IT study. A total of 9,780 patients cared for by home healthcare services completed the HHCAHPS along with a measure of satisfaction for the care received. Structural validity was assessed with a confirmatory analytical approach (CFA). Construct validity was ascertained via hypothesis testing (convergent validity) by correlating the HHCAHPS scores with the scores derived from the measure of patient satisfaction for care. Internal consistency was assessed with the Omega (ω) coefficient.
Results: Structural validity was confirmed, with satisfactory fit indices of the CFA model specified according to the conceptualized three-factor structure ("care of patients", "communication with the providers", and "specific care issues"). Construct validity was confirmed with moderate correlations between the level of satisfaction for care and the factors "communication with the providers" (r = 0.39, p < 0.001), "care of patients" (r = 0.34, p < 0.001), and "specific care issues" (r = 0.19, p < 0.001). Internal consistency was satisfactory for the "specific care issues" factor (ω = 0.81), while it was at the threshold of acceptability for the other factors (ω = 0.60-0.62).
Conclusions: This study shows that the HHCAHPS is valid and sufficiently reliable when tested on the Italian population. Therefore, this tool can be supportive for promoting research and designing interventions to promote patient-centered care within home healthcare settings.