预测髋关节和膝关节置换术后翻修手术的患者预后和风险:使用瑞士国家联合登记(SIRIS)的建模方法比较的研究方案。

IF 2.6
Léonie Hofstetter, Nathalie Schweyckart, Christof Seiler, Christian Brand, Laura C Rosella, Mazda Farshad, Milo A Puhan, Cesar A Hincapié
{"title":"预测髋关节和膝关节置换术后翻修手术的患者预后和风险:使用瑞士国家联合登记(SIRIS)的建模方法比较的研究方案。","authors":"Léonie Hofstetter, Nathalie Schweyckart, Christof Seiler, Christian Brand, Laura C Rosella, Mazda Farshad, Milo A Puhan, Cesar A Hincapié","doi":"10.1186/s41512-025-00200-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prediction of postoperative patient-reported outcomes and risk for revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can inform clinical decision-making, health resource allocation, and care planning. Machine learning (ML) algorithms are increasingly used as an alternative to traditional logistic regression (LR) prediction, but there is uncertainty about their superiority in overall model performance. The aim of this study is to compare the predictive performance of LR with different ML approaches for predicting patient outcomes and risk for revision surgery after THA and TKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based historical cohort study will be developed using routinely collected data from all primary and revision THA and TKA procedures performed in Switzerland and registered in the Swiss National Joint Registry (SIRIS). Patients of age ≥ 18 years with surgery for primary osteoarthritis from 01 January 2015 up to 31 December 2023 will be included. Outcomes of interest will be (1) 12-month postoperative poor pain outcome (defined as < 50% improvement of pain or < 3 absolute reduction in pain on a 11-point (0 to 10) numeric rating scale) and poor satisfaction outcome, and (2) early revision within 5 years after primary surgery. Prespecified predictor variables will include demographic characteristics, comorbidity score, patient-reported health status measures, and surgical variables. Measures of overall predictive accuracy, discrimination, and calibration will be used to compare predictive performance, and decision curve analysis performed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of models. The models will be internally validated using cross-validation and externally validated using geographical validation. Development of the models will be informed by the updated Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD + AI) statement.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will develop, validate, and compare prediction models for postoperative patient-reported outcomes and risk for revision surgery after THA and TKA using SIRIS data.</p>","PeriodicalId":72800,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","volume":"9 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting patient outcomes and risk for revision surgery after hip and knee replacement surgery: study protocol for a comparison of modelling approaches using the Swiss National Joint Registry (SIRIS).\",\"authors\":\"Léonie Hofstetter, Nathalie Schweyckart, Christof Seiler, Christian Brand, Laura C Rosella, Mazda Farshad, Milo A Puhan, Cesar A Hincapié\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41512-025-00200-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prediction of postoperative patient-reported outcomes and risk for revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can inform clinical decision-making, health resource allocation, and care planning. Machine learning (ML) algorithms are increasingly used as an alternative to traditional logistic regression (LR) prediction, but there is uncertainty about their superiority in overall model performance. The aim of this study is to compare the predictive performance of LR with different ML approaches for predicting patient outcomes and risk for revision surgery after THA and TKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based historical cohort study will be developed using routinely collected data from all primary and revision THA and TKA procedures performed in Switzerland and registered in the Swiss National Joint Registry (SIRIS). Patients of age ≥ 18 years with surgery for primary osteoarthritis from 01 January 2015 up to 31 December 2023 will be included. Outcomes of interest will be (1) 12-month postoperative poor pain outcome (defined as < 50% improvement of pain or < 3 absolute reduction in pain on a 11-point (0 to 10) numeric rating scale) and poor satisfaction outcome, and (2) early revision within 5 years after primary surgery. Prespecified predictor variables will include demographic characteristics, comorbidity score, patient-reported health status measures, and surgical variables. Measures of overall predictive accuracy, discrimination, and calibration will be used to compare predictive performance, and decision curve analysis performed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of models. The models will be internally validated using cross-validation and externally validated using geographical validation. Development of the models will be informed by the updated Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD + AI) statement.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will develop, validate, and compare prediction models for postoperative patient-reported outcomes and risk for revision surgery after THA and TKA using SIRIS data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and prognostic research\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320300/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and prognostic research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-025-00200-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-025-00200-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预测患者报告的全髋关节置换术(THA)或全膝关节置换术(TKA)后翻修手术的预后和风险可以为临床决策、卫生资源分配和护理计划提供信息。机器学习(ML)算法越来越多地被用作传统逻辑回归(LR)预测的替代方法,但它们在整体模型性能方面的优势尚不确定。本研究的目的是比较LR与不同ML方法在预测THA和TKA后患者翻修手术的预后和风险方面的预测性能。方法:一项基于人群的历史队列研究将使用常规收集的数据,这些数据来自在瑞士进行的所有初级和修订THA和TKA手术,并在瑞士国家联合登记处(SIRIS)注册。在2015年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间接受原发性骨关节炎手术的年龄≥18岁的患者将被纳入研究。(1)术后12个月的不良疼痛结局(定义为讨论:本研究将使用SIRIS数据开发、验证和比较术后患者报告的THA和TKA后翻修手术的结局和风险的预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting patient outcomes and risk for revision surgery after hip and knee replacement surgery: study protocol for a comparison of modelling approaches using the Swiss National Joint Registry (SIRIS).

Background: Prediction of postoperative patient-reported outcomes and risk for revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can inform clinical decision-making, health resource allocation, and care planning. Machine learning (ML) algorithms are increasingly used as an alternative to traditional logistic regression (LR) prediction, but there is uncertainty about their superiority in overall model performance. The aim of this study is to compare the predictive performance of LR with different ML approaches for predicting patient outcomes and risk for revision surgery after THA and TKA.

Methods: A population-based historical cohort study will be developed using routinely collected data from all primary and revision THA and TKA procedures performed in Switzerland and registered in the Swiss National Joint Registry (SIRIS). Patients of age ≥ 18 years with surgery for primary osteoarthritis from 01 January 2015 up to 31 December 2023 will be included. Outcomes of interest will be (1) 12-month postoperative poor pain outcome (defined as < 50% improvement of pain or < 3 absolute reduction in pain on a 11-point (0 to 10) numeric rating scale) and poor satisfaction outcome, and (2) early revision within 5 years after primary surgery. Prespecified predictor variables will include demographic characteristics, comorbidity score, patient-reported health status measures, and surgical variables. Measures of overall predictive accuracy, discrimination, and calibration will be used to compare predictive performance, and decision curve analysis performed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of models. The models will be internally validated using cross-validation and externally validated using geographical validation. Development of the models will be informed by the updated Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD + AI) statement.

Discussion: This study will develop, validate, and compare prediction models for postoperative patient-reported outcomes and risk for revision surgery after THA and TKA using SIRIS data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信