我们如何定义术前贫血?短段腰椎融合术患者不同贫血阈值的比较。

IF 1.3 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Tariq Z Issa, Omar H Tarawneh, Teeto Ezeonu, Mark J Lambrechts, Mark F Kurd, Ian David Kaye, Jose A Canseco, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder
{"title":"我们如何定义术前贫血?短段腰椎融合术患者不同贫血阈值的比较。","authors":"Tariq Z Issa, Omar H Tarawneh, Teeto Ezeonu, Mark J Lambrechts, Mark F Kurd, Ian David Kaye, Jose A Canseco, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_69_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anemia is a risk factor for increased transfusions. However, various definitions of anemia have been described in scientific literature and a consensus on how to appropriately diagnose anemia or who to preoperatively optimize is lacking. We aimed to compare multiple anemia definitions and evaluate if any threshold best predicts transfusion requirements and surgical outcomes following spinal fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1-2 level posterior spinal fusions. Preoperative hemoglobin was defined based on preoperative laboratories within 28 days of surgery. Anemia was diagnosed using the World Health Organization (WHO), the American Society of Hematology (ASH), and the Cleveland Clinic (CC) thresholds. Youden's index and multivariable regressions were utilized to analyze associations of anemia with postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2257 patients were included. Patients who received a transfusion were more likely anemic regardless of definition (WHO: 60.0% vs. 14.0%, <i>P</i> < 0.001; ASH: 61.0% vs. 17.8%; CC: 70.0% vs. 26.6%; all, <i>P</i> < 0.001). On multivariable regression, all anemia definitions were independently associated with transfusions and nonhome discharge. WHO anemia was associated with the highest odds of transfusion (odds ratio [OR]: 7.48, <i>P</i> < 0.001), followed by ASH anemia (OR: 6.63, <i>P</i> < 0.001), ASH preoperative anemia (OR: 6.45, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and CC anemia (OR: 5.92, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Only WHO anemia was associated with complications (OR: 1.55, <i>P</i> = 0.045). Receiver operating characteristic curves suggest that every anemia threshold was acceptable (area under the curve [AUC] >0.70) for identifying patients needing a postoperative transfusion: ASH preoperative demonstrated the greatest AUC (AUC: 0.746), followed by WHO anemia (AUC: 0.730). All performed poorly in predicting complications (AUC: 0.541-0.553), readmissions (AUC: 0.525-0.535), and nonhome discharge (AUC: 0.561-0.596).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Small variations in anemia definitions do not significantly impact the identification of patients necessitating a transfusion. However, the more discriminative WHO definition may best predict postoperative complications for lumbar fusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":"16 2","pages":"188-194"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12313028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How are we defining preoperative anemia? A comparison of various anemia thresholds among patients undergoing short-construct lumbar spinal fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Tariq Z Issa, Omar H Tarawneh, Teeto Ezeonu, Mark J Lambrechts, Mark F Kurd, Ian David Kaye, Jose A Canseco, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_69_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anemia is a risk factor for increased transfusions. However, various definitions of anemia have been described in scientific literature and a consensus on how to appropriately diagnose anemia or who to preoperatively optimize is lacking. We aimed to compare multiple anemia definitions and evaluate if any threshold best predicts transfusion requirements and surgical outcomes following spinal fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1-2 level posterior spinal fusions. Preoperative hemoglobin was defined based on preoperative laboratories within 28 days of surgery. Anemia was diagnosed using the World Health Organization (WHO), the American Society of Hematology (ASH), and the Cleveland Clinic (CC) thresholds. Youden's index and multivariable regressions were utilized to analyze associations of anemia with postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2257 patients were included. Patients who received a transfusion were more likely anemic regardless of definition (WHO: 60.0% vs. 14.0%, <i>P</i> < 0.001; ASH: 61.0% vs. 17.8%; CC: 70.0% vs. 26.6%; all, <i>P</i> < 0.001). On multivariable regression, all anemia definitions were independently associated with transfusions and nonhome discharge. WHO anemia was associated with the highest odds of transfusion (odds ratio [OR]: 7.48, <i>P</i> < 0.001), followed by ASH anemia (OR: 6.63, <i>P</i> < 0.001), ASH preoperative anemia (OR: 6.45, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and CC anemia (OR: 5.92, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Only WHO anemia was associated with complications (OR: 1.55, <i>P</i> = 0.045). Receiver operating characteristic curves suggest that every anemia threshold was acceptable (area under the curve [AUC] >0.70) for identifying patients needing a postoperative transfusion: ASH preoperative demonstrated the greatest AUC (AUC: 0.746), followed by WHO anemia (AUC: 0.730). All performed poorly in predicting complications (AUC: 0.541-0.553), readmissions (AUC: 0.525-0.535), and nonhome discharge (AUC: 0.561-0.596).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Small variations in anemia definitions do not significantly impact the identification of patients necessitating a transfusion. However, the more discriminative WHO definition may best predict postoperative complications for lumbar fusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"188-194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12313028/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_69_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_69_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:贫血是输血增加的危险因素。然而,科学文献中对贫血的定义不同,对于如何正确诊断贫血或术前优化谁缺乏共识。我们的目的是比较多种贫血的定义,并评估是否有任何阈值可以最好地预测脊柱融合术后输血需求和手术结果。方法:我们对1-2节段后路脊柱融合术进行回顾性队列研究。术前血红蛋白根据手术28天内的术前实验室测定。贫血的诊断采用世界卫生组织(WHO)、美国血液学会(ASH)和克利夫兰诊所(CC)的阈值。利用约登指数和多变量回归分析贫血与术后预后的关系。结果:共纳入2257例患者。接受输血的患者更有可能贫血,无论定义如何(who: 60.0% vs. 14.0%, P < 0.001;ASH: 61.0% vs. 17.8%;CC: 70.0% vs. 26.6%;均P < 0.001)。在多变量回归中,所有贫血定义都与输血和非家庭出院独立相关。WHO贫血与输血几率最高相关(比值比[OR]: 7.48, P < 0.001),其次是ASH贫血(比值比:6.63,P < 0.001)、ASH术前贫血(比值比:6.45,P < 0.001)和CC贫血(比值比:5.92,P < 0.001)。只有WHO贫血与并发症相关(OR: 1.55, P = 0.045)。受试者工作特征曲线表明,每一个贫血阈值都是可接受的(曲线下面积[AUC] >.70),用于确定需要术后输血的患者:ASH术前显示出最大的AUC (AUC: 0.746),其次是WHO贫血(AUC: 0.730)。所有患者在预测并发症(AUC: 0.541-0.553)、再入院(AUC: 0.525-0.535)和非家庭出院(AUC: 0.561-0.596)方面均表现不佳。结论:贫血定义的微小变化不会显著影响需要输血的患者的识别。然而,更具辨别性的WHO定义可能最好地预测腰椎融合术后并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How are we defining preoperative anemia? A comparison of various anemia thresholds among patients undergoing short-construct lumbar spinal fusion.

Background: Anemia is a risk factor for increased transfusions. However, various definitions of anemia have been described in scientific literature and a consensus on how to appropriately diagnose anemia or who to preoperatively optimize is lacking. We aimed to compare multiple anemia definitions and evaluate if any threshold best predicts transfusion requirements and surgical outcomes following spinal fusion.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1-2 level posterior spinal fusions. Preoperative hemoglobin was defined based on preoperative laboratories within 28 days of surgery. Anemia was diagnosed using the World Health Organization (WHO), the American Society of Hematology (ASH), and the Cleveland Clinic (CC) thresholds. Youden's index and multivariable regressions were utilized to analyze associations of anemia with postoperative outcomes.

Results: A total of 2257 patients were included. Patients who received a transfusion were more likely anemic regardless of definition (WHO: 60.0% vs. 14.0%, P < 0.001; ASH: 61.0% vs. 17.8%; CC: 70.0% vs. 26.6%; all, P < 0.001). On multivariable regression, all anemia definitions were independently associated with transfusions and nonhome discharge. WHO anemia was associated with the highest odds of transfusion (odds ratio [OR]: 7.48, P < 0.001), followed by ASH anemia (OR: 6.63, P < 0.001), ASH preoperative anemia (OR: 6.45, P < 0.001), and CC anemia (OR: 5.92, P < 0.001). Only WHO anemia was associated with complications (OR: 1.55, P = 0.045). Receiver operating characteristic curves suggest that every anemia threshold was acceptable (area under the curve [AUC] >0.70) for identifying patients needing a postoperative transfusion: ASH preoperative demonstrated the greatest AUC (AUC: 0.746), followed by WHO anemia (AUC: 0.730). All performed poorly in predicting complications (AUC: 0.541-0.553), readmissions (AUC: 0.525-0.535), and nonhome discharge (AUC: 0.561-0.596).

Conclusions: Small variations in anemia definitions do not significantly impact the identification of patients necessitating a transfusion. However, the more discriminative WHO definition may best predict postoperative complications for lumbar fusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信