探索医疗保健人员的知识、障碍和个性化肿瘤医学的创新方法:范围审查。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Critical Public Health Pub Date : 2025-06-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/09581596.2025.2520410
Shibu Shrestha, Gemma Watts, Susi Geiger
{"title":"探索医疗保健人员的知识、障碍和个性化肿瘤医学的创新方法:范围审查。","authors":"Shibu Shrestha, Gemma Watts, Susi Geiger","doi":"10.1080/09581596.2025.2520410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Personalised medicine is widely utilised in oncology, and healthcare personnel are its main gatekeepers and implementers. This scoping review provides insights into the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare personnel toward personalised medicine for cancer, barriers and challenges faced, and innovative practices employed for the provision of personalised medicine. Extensive database searches identified 19,972 studies, of which 50 studies were included in the final review. The data was charted by two reviewers and analysed thematically. The knowledge of healthcare personnel of personalised medicine was mixed, with some studies reporting overall good knowledge (<i>n</i> = 2) while some reported poor knowledge among healthcare personnel (<i>n</i> = 4). There was high interest (63-95%) in furthering education and training in personalised medicine (<i>n</i> = 6). The commonly reported barriers and challenges were: limited reimbursement and insurance coverage mechanism (<i>n</i> = 11); insufficient education and training (<i>n</i> = 10); and lack of trained personnel to provide the service (<i>n</i> = 7). The innovations identified emphasised enhancing the skills and capacity of the existing workforce as well as using technologies to assist in timely decision-making. Overall, gaps were identified at the human resource, institutional, and systemic levels, which will need to be addressed to improve the provision of personalised medicine and healthcare personnel's confidence levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":51469,"journal":{"name":"Critical Public Health","volume":"35 1","pages":"2520410"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12315847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring healthcare personnel's knowledge, barriers, and innovative approaches in personalised oncology medicine: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Shibu Shrestha, Gemma Watts, Susi Geiger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09581596.2025.2520410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Personalised medicine is widely utilised in oncology, and healthcare personnel are its main gatekeepers and implementers. This scoping review provides insights into the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare personnel toward personalised medicine for cancer, barriers and challenges faced, and innovative practices employed for the provision of personalised medicine. Extensive database searches identified 19,972 studies, of which 50 studies were included in the final review. The data was charted by two reviewers and analysed thematically. The knowledge of healthcare personnel of personalised medicine was mixed, with some studies reporting overall good knowledge (<i>n</i> = 2) while some reported poor knowledge among healthcare personnel (<i>n</i> = 4). There was high interest (63-95%) in furthering education and training in personalised medicine (<i>n</i> = 6). The commonly reported barriers and challenges were: limited reimbursement and insurance coverage mechanism (<i>n</i> = 11); insufficient education and training (<i>n</i> = 10); and lack of trained personnel to provide the service (<i>n</i> = 7). The innovations identified emphasised enhancing the skills and capacity of the existing workforce as well as using technologies to assist in timely decision-making. Overall, gaps were identified at the human resource, institutional, and systemic levels, which will need to be addressed to improve the provision of personalised medicine and healthcare personnel's confidence levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Public Health\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"2520410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12315847/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2025.2520410\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2025.2520410","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

个体化医疗在肿瘤学中得到广泛应用,而医疗保健人员是其主要的守门人和实施者。这一范围综述提供了对医疗保健人员对癌症个性化医疗的知识和态度,所面临的障碍和挑战,以及为提供个性化医疗所采用的创新实践的见解。广泛的数据库检索确定了19,972项研究,其中50项研究被纳入最终审查。数据由两位审稿人绘制图表并进行主题分析。卫生保健人员对个性化医疗的知识参差不齐,一些研究报告总体知识良好(n = 2),而一些研究报告卫生保健人员知识较差(n = 4)。有很高的兴趣(63-95%)继续教育和培训个性化医疗(n = 6)。通常报告的障碍和挑战是:有限的报销和保险覆盖机制(n = 11);教育培训不足(n = 10);缺乏训练有素的人员提供服务(n = 7)。确定的创新重点是提高现有劳动力的技能和能力,以及利用技术协助及时决策。总的来说,在人力资源、机构和系统层面上发现了差距,需要解决这些差距,以改善个性化医疗的提供和卫生保健人员的信心水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring healthcare personnel's knowledge, barriers, and innovative approaches in personalised oncology medicine: a scoping review.

Exploring healthcare personnel's knowledge, barriers, and innovative approaches in personalised oncology medicine: a scoping review.

Exploring healthcare personnel's knowledge, barriers, and innovative approaches in personalised oncology medicine: a scoping review.

Personalised medicine is widely utilised in oncology, and healthcare personnel are its main gatekeepers and implementers. This scoping review provides insights into the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare personnel toward personalised medicine for cancer, barriers and challenges faced, and innovative practices employed for the provision of personalised medicine. Extensive database searches identified 19,972 studies, of which 50 studies were included in the final review. The data was charted by two reviewers and analysed thematically. The knowledge of healthcare personnel of personalised medicine was mixed, with some studies reporting overall good knowledge (n = 2) while some reported poor knowledge among healthcare personnel (n = 4). There was high interest (63-95%) in furthering education and training in personalised medicine (n = 6). The commonly reported barriers and challenges were: limited reimbursement and insurance coverage mechanism (n = 11); insufficient education and training (n = 10); and lack of trained personnel to provide the service (n = 7). The innovations identified emphasised enhancing the skills and capacity of the existing workforce as well as using technologies to assist in timely decision-making. Overall, gaps were identified at the human resource, institutional, and systemic levels, which will need to be addressed to improve the provision of personalised medicine and healthcare personnel's confidence levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Critical Public Health (CPH) is a respected peer-review journal for researchers and practitioners working in public health, health promotion and related fields. It brings together international scholarship to provide critical analyses of theory and practice, reviews of literature and explorations of new ways of working. The journal publishes high quality work that is open and critical in perspective and which reports on current research and debates in the field. CPH encourages an interdisciplinary focus and features innovative analyses. It is committed to exploring and debating issues of equity and social justice; in particular, issues of sexism, racism and other forms of oppression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信