在发展中国家的第四医疗中心,机器人根治性前列腺切除术和部分肾切除术后23小时出院是否可行和安全?

IF 0.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Madhuri Evangeline Sadanala, Arun Jacob Philip George, Partho Mukherjee, Thampi J Nirmal
{"title":"在发展中国家的第四医疗中心,机器人根治性前列腺切除术和部分肾切除术后23小时出院是否可行和安全?","authors":"Madhuri Evangeline Sadanala, Arun Jacob Philip George, Partho Mukherjee, Thampi J Nirmal","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_496_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP) or partial nephrectomy (PN) is often a daycare or overnight procedure in developed countries. This study assesses the safety and feasibility of discharging patients within 23 h after surgery in a developing country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study examined patients who underwent RP and PN between June 2022 and December 2023. We analyzed the clinical-pathological profiles of patients discharged within 23 h after surgery versus later. A single surgeon performed all surgeries, and an early recovery protocol was practiced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 71 PN patients, 62 (87.3%) were discharged within 23 h (of which, nine were discharged the same evening); the median stay for others was 3 days. Four patients had complications that delayed discharge, and one required readmission. Among 28 RP patients, 20 (71.5%) were discharged within 23 h; the median stay for others was 3 days. Two patients with complications had delayed discharge. There were no 30-day readmissions in the RP cohort. Factors such as comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, and tumor staging did not predict discharge timing in either the RP or PN cohort. Furthermore, none required blood transfusions or conversion to open surgical procedures, and there were no recorded fatalities in either cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Twenty-three-hour discharge following robot-assisted RP and PN demonstrated both safety and feasibility in a developing country, which is contingent upon the implementation of an early recovery protocol in a tertiary or quaternary care setting. Effective preoperative counseling and interdepartmental communication are essential for success.</p>","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":"41 3","pages":"195-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is 23-h discharge following robotic radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy feasible and safe in a quaternary care center in a developing country?\",\"authors\":\"Madhuri Evangeline Sadanala, Arun Jacob Philip George, Partho Mukherjee, Thampi J Nirmal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/iju.iju_496_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP) or partial nephrectomy (PN) is often a daycare or overnight procedure in developed countries. This study assesses the safety and feasibility of discharging patients within 23 h after surgery in a developing country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study examined patients who underwent RP and PN between June 2022 and December 2023. We analyzed the clinical-pathological profiles of patients discharged within 23 h after surgery versus later. A single surgeon performed all surgeries, and an early recovery protocol was practiced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 71 PN patients, 62 (87.3%) were discharged within 23 h (of which, nine were discharged the same evening); the median stay for others was 3 days. Four patients had complications that delayed discharge, and one required readmission. Among 28 RP patients, 20 (71.5%) were discharged within 23 h; the median stay for others was 3 days. Two patients with complications had delayed discharge. There were no 30-day readmissions in the RP cohort. Factors such as comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, and tumor staging did not predict discharge timing in either the RP or PN cohort. Furthermore, none required blood transfusions or conversion to open surgical procedures, and there were no recorded fatalities in either cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Twenty-three-hour discharge following robot-assisted RP and PN demonstrated both safety and feasibility in a developing country, which is contingent upon the implementation of an early recovery protocol in a tertiary or quaternary care setting. Effective preoperative counseling and interdepartmental communication are essential for success.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"195-203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312830/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_496_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_496_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在发达国家,机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RP)或部分肾切除术(PN)通常是一种日间护理或夜间手术。本研究评估了一个发展中国家术后23小时内患者出院的安全性和可行性。方法:这项回顾性队列研究调查了2022年6月至2023年12月期间接受RP和PN治疗的患者。我们分析了术后23小时内和之后出院的患者的临床病理特征。所有的手术都由一名外科医生进行,并实行了早期康复方案。结果:71例PN患者中,62例(87.3%)在23 h内出院(其中9例当晚出院);其他人的平均停留时间为3天。4例患者出现并发症延迟出院,1例患者需要再次入院。28例RP患者中,20例(71.5%)在23 h内出院;其他人的平均停留时间为3天。2例合并并发症患者延迟出院。在RP队列中没有30天的再入院。在RP组和PN组中,合并症、美国麻醉医师学会分级和肿瘤分期等因素不能预测出院时间。此外,没有人需要输血或转换为开放式手术,两组均无死亡记录。结论:在发展中国家,机器人辅助RP和PN后23小时出院证明了安全性和可行性,这取决于在三级或四级护理环境中实施早期恢复方案。有效的术前咨询和部门间沟通是成功的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Is 23-h discharge following robotic radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy feasible and safe in a quaternary care center in a developing country?

Is 23-h discharge following robotic radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy feasible and safe in a quaternary care center in a developing country?

Introduction: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP) or partial nephrectomy (PN) is often a daycare or overnight procedure in developed countries. This study assesses the safety and feasibility of discharging patients within 23 h after surgery in a developing country.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined patients who underwent RP and PN between June 2022 and December 2023. We analyzed the clinical-pathological profiles of patients discharged within 23 h after surgery versus later. A single surgeon performed all surgeries, and an early recovery protocol was practiced.

Results: Out of 71 PN patients, 62 (87.3%) were discharged within 23 h (of which, nine were discharged the same evening); the median stay for others was 3 days. Four patients had complications that delayed discharge, and one required readmission. Among 28 RP patients, 20 (71.5%) were discharged within 23 h; the median stay for others was 3 days. Two patients with complications had delayed discharge. There were no 30-day readmissions in the RP cohort. Factors such as comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, and tumor staging did not predict discharge timing in either the RP or PN cohort. Furthermore, none required blood transfusions or conversion to open surgical procedures, and there were no recorded fatalities in either cohort.

Conclusions: Twenty-three-hour discharge following robot-assisted RP and PN demonstrated both safety and feasibility in a developing country, which is contingent upon the implementation of an early recovery protocol in a tertiary or quaternary care setting. Effective preoperative counseling and interdepartmental communication are essential for success.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Urology
Indian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Urology-IJU (ISSN 0970-1591) is official publication of the Urological Society of India. The journal is published Quarterly. Bibliographic listings: The journal is indexed with Abstracts on Hygiene and Communicable Diseases, CAB Abstracts, Caspur, DOAJ, EBSCO Publishing’s Electronic Databases, Excerpta Medica / EMBASE, Expanded Academic ASAP, Genamics JournalSeek, Global Health, Google Scholar, Health & Wellness Research Center, Health Reference Center Academic, Hinari, Index Copernicus, IndMed, OpenJGate, PubMed, Pubmed Central, Scimago Journal Ranking, SCOLOAR, SCOPUS, SIIC databases, SNEMB, Tropical Diseases Bulletin, Ulrich’s International Periodical Directory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信