性和性别在缓和和临终关怀:服务评价和定性分析。

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524251344310
Briony F Hudson, Bethan Edwards, Ellie Wagstaff, Nicola White
{"title":"性和性别在缓和和临终关怀:服务评价和定性分析。","authors":"Briony F Hudson, Bethan Edwards, Ellie Wagstaff, Nicola White","doi":"10.1177/26323524251344310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sex and gender are determinants of health and well-being. A person's sex is assigned at birth while gender identity is culturally determined and influences many aspects of life. Little evidence exists regarding differences in the use or experience of palliative care services between people of different sex and genders in the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore differences by sex and gender in (1) time from service referral to death, (2) reason for referral, (3) preference for place of death and (4) place of death in UK hospice and community services. In addition, palliative care staff's views of the impact of sex and gender on end-of-life experiences are explored.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Sequential multiple methods design including a service evaluation of routinely collected data from hospices and community nursing services across the United Kingdom (January 2019 to December 2022) and a qualitative study. Quantitative data were extracted from a central database, which collated all data from SystmOne, PatientConnect and EMIS and were summarised using descriptive statistics. Focus groups were conducted with palliative care staff from Wales and Scotland and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospice inpatient services, community nursing teams.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety thousand six hundred and fourteen data points were analysed. High levels of missing data were noted around gender identity, alongside other demographic characteristics. A roughly even split between male (50%) and female (47%) patients was observed. Gender identity was not reported for 25% of the sample. The majority of patients were White British (82%). No differences were noted in other variables explored. In the qualitative study, differences by gender were percieved by palliative care staff in relation to patient and carer experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quantitative data suggest limited differences in access to care or service use while qualitative data suggest differences in experiences of palliative care between sexes and genders. To enable explorations of intersectionality, sensitive data collection is needed to support future research and service delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":"19 ","pages":"26323524251344310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex and gender in palliative and end-of-life care: A service evaluation and qualitative analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Briony F Hudson, Bethan Edwards, Ellie Wagstaff, Nicola White\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26323524251344310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sex and gender are determinants of health and well-being. A person's sex is assigned at birth while gender identity is culturally determined and influences many aspects of life. Little evidence exists regarding differences in the use or experience of palliative care services between people of different sex and genders in the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore differences by sex and gender in (1) time from service referral to death, (2) reason for referral, (3) preference for place of death and (4) place of death in UK hospice and community services. In addition, palliative care staff's views of the impact of sex and gender on end-of-life experiences are explored.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Sequential multiple methods design including a service evaluation of routinely collected data from hospices and community nursing services across the United Kingdom (January 2019 to December 2022) and a qualitative study. Quantitative data were extracted from a central database, which collated all data from SystmOne, PatientConnect and EMIS and were summarised using descriptive statistics. Focus groups were conducted with palliative care staff from Wales and Scotland and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospice inpatient services, community nursing teams.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety thousand six hundred and fourteen data points were analysed. High levels of missing data were noted around gender identity, alongside other demographic characteristics. A roughly even split between male (50%) and female (47%) patients was observed. Gender identity was not reported for 25% of the sample. The majority of patients were White British (82%). No differences were noted in other variables explored. In the qualitative study, differences by gender were percieved by palliative care staff in relation to patient and carer experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quantitative data suggest limited differences in access to care or service use while qualitative data suggest differences in experiences of palliative care between sexes and genders. To enable explorations of intersectionality, sensitive data collection is needed to support future research and service delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"26323524251344310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314234/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524251344310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524251344310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:性和社会性别是健康和福祉的决定因素。一个人的性别是在出生时确定的,而性别认同是由文化决定的,影响着生活的许多方面。很少有证据表明,在英国,不同性别和性别的人在使用或体验姑息治疗服务方面存在差异。目的:探讨英国安宁疗护和社区服务中(1)转介至死亡的时间、(2)转介原因、(3)对死亡地点的偏好和(4)死亡地点的性别差异。此外,姑息治疗人员的观点的影响的性别和性别对临终体验进行了探讨。设计:顺序多方法设计,包括对英国各地临终关怀和社区护理服务常规收集的数据进行服务评估(2019年1月至2022年12月)和定性研究。定量数据从中央数据库中提取,该数据库整理了来自SystmOne、PatientConnect和EMIS的所有数据,并使用描述性统计进行汇总。焦点小组与来自威尔士和苏格兰的姑息治疗人员进行了讨论,并使用反身性主题分析进行了分析。环境:安宁疗护住院服务、社区护理团队。结果:分析了九万六千十四个数据点。性别认同和其他人口统计学特征方面的数据缺失程度很高。男性(50%)和女性(47%)患者的比例大致相等。25%的样本没有报告性别认同。大多数患者是英国白人(82%)。在其他变量中没有发现差异。在质性研究中,性别差异被姑息治疗人员感知到与病人和护理人员经验有关。结论:定量数据表明,在获得护理或服务使用方面存在有限差异,而定性数据表明,性别和性别之间在姑息治疗经验方面存在差异。为了探索交叉性,需要收集敏感数据来支持未来的研究和服务提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sex and gender in palliative and end-of-life care: A service evaluation and qualitative analysis.

Sex and gender in palliative and end-of-life care: A service evaluation and qualitative analysis.

Sex and gender in palliative and end-of-life care: A service evaluation and qualitative analysis.

Sex and gender in palliative and end-of-life care: A service evaluation and qualitative analysis.

Background: Sex and gender are determinants of health and well-being. A person's sex is assigned at birth while gender identity is culturally determined and influences many aspects of life. Little evidence exists regarding differences in the use or experience of palliative care services between people of different sex and genders in the United Kingdom.

Aims: To explore differences by sex and gender in (1) time from service referral to death, (2) reason for referral, (3) preference for place of death and (4) place of death in UK hospice and community services. In addition, palliative care staff's views of the impact of sex and gender on end-of-life experiences are explored.

Design: Sequential multiple methods design including a service evaluation of routinely collected data from hospices and community nursing services across the United Kingdom (January 2019 to December 2022) and a qualitative study. Quantitative data were extracted from a central database, which collated all data from SystmOne, PatientConnect and EMIS and were summarised using descriptive statistics. Focus groups were conducted with palliative care staff from Wales and Scotland and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Setting: Hospice inpatient services, community nursing teams.

Results: Ninety thousand six hundred and fourteen data points were analysed. High levels of missing data were noted around gender identity, alongside other demographic characteristics. A roughly even split between male (50%) and female (47%) patients was observed. Gender identity was not reported for 25% of the sample. The majority of patients were White British (82%). No differences were noted in other variables explored. In the qualitative study, differences by gender were percieved by palliative care staff in relation to patient and carer experiences.

Conclusion: Quantitative data suggest limited differences in access to care or service use while qualitative data suggest differences in experiences of palliative care between sexes and genders. To enable explorations of intersectionality, sensitive data collection is needed to support future research and service delivery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信