双活动与传统全髋关节置换术在股骨颈骨折中的对比:一项登记嵌套、开放标签、聚类随机交叉试验(DISTINCT):统计分析计划。

IF 3.1 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
John E Farey, Tania Alland, Justine M Naylor, Thu-Lan Kelly, Kara Cashman, Michelle Lorimer, Carl Holder, Adriane M Lewin, Frances Garden, Chi Kin Law, Jacqueline C T Close, Stephen E Graves, Richard de Steiger, Peter L Lewis, Sam Adie, Sanja Lujic, Ian A Harris
{"title":"双活动与传统全髋关节置换术在股骨颈骨折中的对比:一项登记嵌套、开放标签、聚类随机交叉试验(DISTINCT):统计分析计划。","authors":"John E Farey, Tania Alland, Justine M Naylor, Thu-Lan Kelly, Kara Cashman, Michelle Lorimer, Carl Holder, Adriane M Lewin, Frances Garden, Chi Kin Law, Jacqueline C T Close, Stephen E Graves, Richard de Steiger, Peter L Lewis, Sam Adie, Sanja Lujic, Ian A Harris","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.68.BJO-2025-0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>A statistical analysis plan for analysis of DISTINCT (Dual-mobIlity verSus conventional Total hip arthroplasty In femoral Neck fractures, a registry-nested, open-label, Cluster-randomized crossover Trial) is outlined to aid transparency in analytical procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DISTINCT aims to determine whether dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty (THA) is superior to conventional THA in reducing postoperative prosthetic hip dislocations in patients undergoing surgery for femoral neck fractures. The trial is nested within the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). The clusters comprised hospitals that perform at least 12 THAs for femoral neck fracture per annum. Each hospital was randomized to two sequential periods of dual-mobility THA and conventional THA, with the order randomly allocated. Crossover occurred once sites had recruited an average of 16 patients eligible for the primary analysis in the initial allocation, to provide an average of 32 patients per cluster. The primary outcome is the incidence of prosthetic hip dislocation in the first postoperative year. Secondary outcomes are the rate of revision for dislocation, all-cause revision, mortality at one, two, and five years, and complication rates at one year. All analyses will use cluster summary methods, weighted by cluster size to account for unequal cluster sizes. Participants will be analyzed in the groups to which they were randomized (intention-to-treat). Sensitivity analyses will be performed to analyze the unadjusted primary outcome based on treatment received (as-treated) and per-protocol groupings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This statistical analysis plan describes the detailed analysis of the DISTINCT study, a registry-nested, open-label, cluster-randomized crossover trial that will provide supporting evidence for prosthesis choice in the common clinical problem of femoral neck fracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 8","pages":"866-875"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12318617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual-mobIlity verSus conventional Total hip arthroplasty In femoral Neck fractures, a registry-nested, open-label, Cluster-randomized crossover Trial (DISTINCT) : statistical analysis plan.\",\"authors\":\"John E Farey, Tania Alland, Justine M Naylor, Thu-Lan Kelly, Kara Cashman, Michelle Lorimer, Carl Holder, Adriane M Lewin, Frances Garden, Chi Kin Law, Jacqueline C T Close, Stephen E Graves, Richard de Steiger, Peter L Lewis, Sam Adie, Sanja Lujic, Ian A Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.68.BJO-2025-0042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>A statistical analysis plan for analysis of DISTINCT (Dual-mobIlity verSus conventional Total hip arthroplasty In femoral Neck fractures, a registry-nested, open-label, Cluster-randomized crossover Trial) is outlined to aid transparency in analytical procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DISTINCT aims to determine whether dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty (THA) is superior to conventional THA in reducing postoperative prosthetic hip dislocations in patients undergoing surgery for femoral neck fractures. The trial is nested within the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). The clusters comprised hospitals that perform at least 12 THAs for femoral neck fracture per annum. Each hospital was randomized to two sequential periods of dual-mobility THA and conventional THA, with the order randomly allocated. Crossover occurred once sites had recruited an average of 16 patients eligible for the primary analysis in the initial allocation, to provide an average of 32 patients per cluster. The primary outcome is the incidence of prosthetic hip dislocation in the first postoperative year. Secondary outcomes are the rate of revision for dislocation, all-cause revision, mortality at one, two, and five years, and complication rates at one year. All analyses will use cluster summary methods, weighted by cluster size to account for unequal cluster sizes. Participants will be analyzed in the groups to which they were randomized (intention-to-treat). Sensitivity analyses will be performed to analyze the unadjusted primary outcome based on treatment received (as-treated) and per-protocol groupings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This statistical analysis plan describes the detailed analysis of the DISTINCT study, a registry-nested, open-label, cluster-randomized crossover trial that will provide supporting evidence for prosthesis choice in the common clinical problem of femoral neck fracture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"6 8\",\"pages\":\"866-875\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12318617/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.68.BJO-2025-0042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.68.BJO-2025-0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为分析DISTINCT(双活动与传统全髋关节置换术在股骨颈骨折中的对比,一项注册嵌套、开放标签、集群随机交叉试验)的统计分析计划概述,以帮助分析过程透明化。方法:DISTINCT旨在确定双活动全髋关节置换术(THA)在减少股骨颈骨折手术患者术后人工髋关节脱位方面是否优于传统THA。该试验嵌套在澳大利亚骨科协会国家关节置换注册(AOANJRR)中。这些集群包括每年至少进行12例股骨颈骨折tha手术的医院。每家医院随机分为双活动髋关节置换术和常规髋关节置换术两个连续阶段,顺序随机分配。一旦在初始分配中平均招募了16名符合主要分析条件的患者,则发生交叉,平均每组32名患者。主要观察指标是术后第一年人工髋关节脱位的发生率。次要结局是脱位翻修率、全因翻修率、1年、2年和5年的死亡率以及1年的并发症发生率。所有的分析都将使用聚类总结方法,通过聚类大小加权来解释不相等的聚类大小。参与者将按随机分组(意向治疗)进行分析。将进行敏感性分析,根据接受的治疗(按治疗)和按方案分组分析未调整的主要结局。结论:本统计分析计划描述了对DISTINCT研究的详细分析,这是一项注册嵌套、开放标签、集群随机交叉试验,将为股骨颈骨折常见临床问题的假体选择提供支持证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dual-mobIlity verSus conventional Total hip arthroplasty In femoral Neck fractures, a registry-nested, open-label, Cluster-randomized crossover Trial (DISTINCT) : statistical analysis plan.

Dual-mobIlity verSus conventional Total hip arthroplasty In femoral Neck fractures, a registry-nested, open-label, Cluster-randomized crossover Trial (DISTINCT) : statistical analysis plan.

Dual-mobIlity verSus conventional Total hip arthroplasty In femoral Neck fractures, a registry-nested, open-label, Cluster-randomized crossover Trial (DISTINCT) : statistical analysis plan.

Aims: A statistical analysis plan for analysis of DISTINCT (Dual-mobIlity verSus conventional Total hip arthroplasty In femoral Neck fractures, a registry-nested, open-label, Cluster-randomized crossover Trial) is outlined to aid transparency in analytical procedures.

Methods: DISTINCT aims to determine whether dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty (THA) is superior to conventional THA in reducing postoperative prosthetic hip dislocations in patients undergoing surgery for femoral neck fractures. The trial is nested within the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). The clusters comprised hospitals that perform at least 12 THAs for femoral neck fracture per annum. Each hospital was randomized to two sequential periods of dual-mobility THA and conventional THA, with the order randomly allocated. Crossover occurred once sites had recruited an average of 16 patients eligible for the primary analysis in the initial allocation, to provide an average of 32 patients per cluster. The primary outcome is the incidence of prosthetic hip dislocation in the first postoperative year. Secondary outcomes are the rate of revision for dislocation, all-cause revision, mortality at one, two, and five years, and complication rates at one year. All analyses will use cluster summary methods, weighted by cluster size to account for unequal cluster sizes. Participants will be analyzed in the groups to which they were randomized (intention-to-treat). Sensitivity analyses will be performed to analyze the unadjusted primary outcome based on treatment received (as-treated) and per-protocol groupings.

Conclusion: This statistical analysis plan describes the detailed analysis of the DISTINCT study, a registry-nested, open-label, cluster-randomized crossover trial that will provide supporting evidence for prosthesis choice in the common clinical problem of femoral neck fracture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信