Naveenkumar Nallathambi, Rahul Bisaralli, Shriganesh Palanikumar Naidu, M S Mallikarjunaswamy, P Praveen, Mahabaleshwar Mamadapur
{"title":"红外热像仪在风湿病中的临床应用综述","authors":"Naveenkumar Nallathambi, Rahul Bisaralli, Shriganesh Palanikumar Naidu, M S Mallikarjunaswamy, P Praveen, Mahabaleshwar Mamadapur","doi":"10.31138/mjr.271024.ita","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical applications of infrared thermography (IRT) in rheumatic diseases (RDs), focusing on its potential as a non-invasive, cost-effective, and reliable tool for diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment to improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy was implemented using various databases, namely Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed Central, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect. After screening, data extraction and quality assessment were performed to synthesise the findings and evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic review included 51 studies comprising 7 randomised controlled trials and 44 observational studies. IRT demonstrated utility in various RDs. In osteoarthritis, it detected elevated temperatures in affected joints, correlating with pain intensity. For rheumatoid arthritis, IRT was effective in diagnosing active synovitis and monitoring disease progression, although its effectiveness was limited in small joint assessments. In Sjögren's syndrome, IRT differentiated dry eye aetiologies, while in fibromyalgia, the studies yielded mixed results. IRT effectively assessed arthritis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis and aided in detecting disease activity, monitoring progression, and evaluating treatment responses in scleroderma and Raynaud's phenomenon. Additionally, IRT showed potential in assessing therapeutic interventions across several conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IRT showed significant potential as a non-invasive tool for diagnosing, monitoring, and evaluating treatment in RDs. While its effectiveness varied by condition, IRT complemented existing methods. Further research is needed to standardise protocols and confirm its clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":32816,"journal":{"name":"Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"36 2","pages":"159-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Application of Infrared Thermography in Rheumatic Diseases: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Naveenkumar Nallathambi, Rahul Bisaralli, Shriganesh Palanikumar Naidu, M S Mallikarjunaswamy, P Praveen, Mahabaleshwar Mamadapur\",\"doi\":\"10.31138/mjr.271024.ita\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical applications of infrared thermography (IRT) in rheumatic diseases (RDs), focusing on its potential as a non-invasive, cost-effective, and reliable tool for diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment to improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy was implemented using various databases, namely Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed Central, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect. After screening, data extraction and quality assessment were performed to synthesise the findings and evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic review included 51 studies comprising 7 randomised controlled trials and 44 observational studies. IRT demonstrated utility in various RDs. In osteoarthritis, it detected elevated temperatures in affected joints, correlating with pain intensity. For rheumatoid arthritis, IRT was effective in diagnosing active synovitis and monitoring disease progression, although its effectiveness was limited in small joint assessments. In Sjögren's syndrome, IRT differentiated dry eye aetiologies, while in fibromyalgia, the studies yielded mixed results. IRT effectively assessed arthritis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis and aided in detecting disease activity, monitoring progression, and evaluating treatment responses in scleroderma and Raynaud's phenomenon. Additionally, IRT showed potential in assessing therapeutic interventions across several conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IRT showed significant potential as a non-invasive tool for diagnosing, monitoring, and evaluating treatment in RDs. While its effectiveness varied by condition, IRT complemented existing methods. Further research is needed to standardise protocols and confirm its clinical utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"159-192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312464/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31138/mjr.271024.ita\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31138/mjr.271024.ita","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本系统综述旨在评估红外热成像(IRT)在风湿病(rd)中的临床应用,重点关注其作为一种无创、经济、可靠的诊断、监测和治疗工具的潜力,以改善患者的预后。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统的文献综述。利用Medline/PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、谷歌Scholar、PubMed Central、Cochrane Library和ScienceDirect等多个数据库实施了综合搜索策略。筛选后,进行数据提取和质量评估,以综合研究结果并评估纳入研究的方法学质量。结果:系统综述纳入51项研究,包括7项随机对照试验和44项观察性研究。IRT在各种rd中展示了实用性。在骨关节炎中,它检测到受影响关节的温度升高,与疼痛强度相关。对于类风湿性关节炎,IRT在诊断活动性滑膜炎和监测疾病进展方面是有效的,尽管其在小关节评估中的有效性有限。在Sjögren综合征中,IRT分化了干眼病因,而在纤维肌痛中,研究得出了不同的结果。IRT有效地评估了青少年特发性关节炎,并有助于检测疾病活动性,监测进展,评估硬皮病和雷诺现象的治疗反应。此外,IRT在评估几种情况下的治疗干预方面显示出潜力。结论:IRT作为一种诊断、监测和评估RDs治疗的无创工具具有重要的潜力。虽然其有效性因情况而异,但IRT是对现有方法的补充。需要进一步的研究来规范方案并确认其临床应用。
Clinical Application of Infrared Thermography in Rheumatic Diseases: A Systematic Review.
Aim: This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical applications of infrared thermography (IRT) in rheumatic diseases (RDs), focusing on its potential as a non-invasive, cost-effective, and reliable tool for diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment to improve patient outcomes.
Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy was implemented using various databases, namely Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed Central, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect. After screening, data extraction and quality assessment were performed to synthesise the findings and evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies.
Results: The systematic review included 51 studies comprising 7 randomised controlled trials and 44 observational studies. IRT demonstrated utility in various RDs. In osteoarthritis, it detected elevated temperatures in affected joints, correlating with pain intensity. For rheumatoid arthritis, IRT was effective in diagnosing active synovitis and monitoring disease progression, although its effectiveness was limited in small joint assessments. In Sjögren's syndrome, IRT differentiated dry eye aetiologies, while in fibromyalgia, the studies yielded mixed results. IRT effectively assessed arthritis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis and aided in detecting disease activity, monitoring progression, and evaluating treatment responses in scleroderma and Raynaud's phenomenon. Additionally, IRT showed potential in assessing therapeutic interventions across several conditions.
Conclusion: IRT showed significant potential as a non-invasive tool for diagnosing, monitoring, and evaluating treatment in RDs. While its effectiveness varied by condition, IRT complemented existing methods. Further research is needed to standardise protocols and confirm its clinical utility.