R Conde-Camacho, M Orozco-Levi, A Londoño, R Gómez-Palau, E Tuta-Quintero, A Naranjo, K Díaz, J De Luque, S Goldfeder, L F Giraldo-Cadavid, M C Guerrero
{"title":"肺动脉高压中危人群的特征:拉丁美洲国家的患者:CAPRI登记","authors":"R Conde-Camacho, M Orozco-Levi, A Londoño, R Gómez-Palau, E Tuta-Quintero, A Naranjo, K Díaz, J De Luque, S Goldfeder, L F Giraldo-Cadavid, M C Guerrero","doi":"10.1002/pul2.70145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in intermediate-risk patients poses a challenge for clinicians, particularly in determining the optimal timing for escalating pharmacological treatment. We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional study that analyzed data from the Colombian Pulmonary Hypertension Network (HAPredCO) on patients diagnosed with PAH. Participants were stratified into low- and high-intermediate risk groups using the four-level ESC/ERS score, which incorporates optimized cutoff values for WHO functional class (WHO FC), the 6-min walk test (6MWT), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)/brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration. A bivariate analysis was conducted to compare study variables at baseline and during clinical follow-up. Additionally, a survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves to compare outcomes between the intermediate-risk groups. A total of 175 patients were analyzed, with a mean age of 44.85 years (SD 15.5), of which 86% (150/175) were women. In the baseline, a total of 75% (131/175) were classified as intermediate-low-risk. In clinical follow-up, 40% (61/154) were classified as intermediate-low-risk, 21% (32/154) were classified as intermediate-low-risk, 23% (35/154) were classified as intermediate-low-risk, and 16% (26/154) as intermediate-high-risk. At baseline, WHO FC III was 61% (107/174), compared to 35% (56/154) at follow-up (<i>p</i> = 0.083). The use of bosentan decreased from 36% (63/175) to 28% (46/154) (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while ambrisentan increased from 18% (31/175) to 30% (47/154), and macitentan increased from 25% (44/175) to 36% (57/154). The use of parenteral prostanoids and selexipag increased by 20% (4% vs. 24%) and 3% (1% vs. 4%) during clinical follow-up, respectively. Overall survival at 1 year of follow-up was 96%, at 2 years 92%, and at 3 years 88%. The survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 98%, 95%, and 90% in the intermediate-low-risk group, and 90%, 80%, and 80% in the intermediate-high-risk group. In this real-world study of PAH in the Colombian HAPredCO registry, the median survival in the intermediate-low-risk group was slightly higher than in the intermediate-high-risk group. At baseline, most patients were classified as intermediate-low-risk. However, during clinical follow-up, risk distribution changed, with a notable proportion shifting across different risk categories.</p>","PeriodicalId":20927,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Circulation","volume":"15 3","pages":"e70145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12318366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of the Population With Intermediate-Risk Status in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Patients in a Latin American Country: The CAPRI Registry.\",\"authors\":\"R Conde-Camacho, M Orozco-Levi, A Londoño, R Gómez-Palau, E Tuta-Quintero, A Naranjo, K Díaz, J De Luque, S Goldfeder, L F Giraldo-Cadavid, M C Guerrero\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pul2.70145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in intermediate-risk patients poses a challenge for clinicians, particularly in determining the optimal timing for escalating pharmacological treatment. We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional study that analyzed data from the Colombian Pulmonary Hypertension Network (HAPredCO) on patients diagnosed with PAH. Participants were stratified into low- and high-intermediate risk groups using the four-level ESC/ERS score, which incorporates optimized cutoff values for WHO functional class (WHO FC), the 6-min walk test (6MWT), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)/brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration. A bivariate analysis was conducted to compare study variables at baseline and during clinical follow-up. Additionally, a survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves to compare outcomes between the intermediate-risk groups. A total of 175 patients were analyzed, with a mean age of 44.85 years (SD 15.5), of which 86% (150/175) were women. In the baseline, a total of 75% (131/175) were classified as intermediate-low-risk. In clinical follow-up, 40% (61/154) were classified as intermediate-low-risk, 21% (32/154) were classified as intermediate-low-risk, 23% (35/154) were classified as intermediate-low-risk, and 16% (26/154) as intermediate-high-risk. At baseline, WHO FC III was 61% (107/174), compared to 35% (56/154) at follow-up (<i>p</i> = 0.083). The use of bosentan decreased from 36% (63/175) to 28% (46/154) (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while ambrisentan increased from 18% (31/175) to 30% (47/154), and macitentan increased from 25% (44/175) to 36% (57/154). The use of parenteral prostanoids and selexipag increased by 20% (4% vs. 24%) and 3% (1% vs. 4%) during clinical follow-up, respectively. Overall survival at 1 year of follow-up was 96%, at 2 years 92%, and at 3 years 88%. The survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 98%, 95%, and 90% in the intermediate-low-risk group, and 90%, 80%, and 80% in the intermediate-high-risk group. In this real-world study of PAH in the Colombian HAPredCO registry, the median survival in the intermediate-low-risk group was slightly higher than in the intermediate-high-risk group. At baseline, most patients were classified as intermediate-low-risk. However, during clinical follow-up, risk distribution changed, with a notable proportion shifting across different risk categories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonary Circulation\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"e70145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12318366/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonary Circulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.70145\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.70145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
中度危险患者肺动脉高压(PAH)对临床医生提出了挑战,特别是在确定升级药物治疗的最佳时机方面。我们进行了一项多中心横断面研究,分析了来自哥伦比亚肺动脉高压网络(HAPredCO)的诊断为PAH的患者的数据。使用四级ESC/ERS评分将参与者分为低风险组和中高风险组,该评分包括WHO功能分类(WHO FC)、6分钟步行测试(6MWT)和n端前脑钠肽(NT-proBNP)/脑钠肽(BNP)浓度的优化临界值。进行双变量分析,比较基线和临床随访期间的研究变量。此外,使用Kaplan-Meier曲线进行生存分析,比较中危组之间的结果。共分析175例患者,平均年龄44.85岁(SD 15.5),其中86%(150/175)为女性。在基线中,共有75%(131/175)被归为中低风险。临床随访中,40%(61/154)为中低危,21%(32/154)为中低危,23%(35/154)为中低危,16%(26/154)为中高危。基线时,WHO FC III为61%(107/174),而随访时为35% (56/154)(p = 0.083)。波生坦的使用从36%(63/175)下降到28% (46/154)
Characterization of the Population With Intermediate-Risk Status in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Patients in a Latin American Country: The CAPRI Registry.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in intermediate-risk patients poses a challenge for clinicians, particularly in determining the optimal timing for escalating pharmacological treatment. We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional study that analyzed data from the Colombian Pulmonary Hypertension Network (HAPredCO) on patients diagnosed with PAH. Participants were stratified into low- and high-intermediate risk groups using the four-level ESC/ERS score, which incorporates optimized cutoff values for WHO functional class (WHO FC), the 6-min walk test (6MWT), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)/brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration. A bivariate analysis was conducted to compare study variables at baseline and during clinical follow-up. Additionally, a survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves to compare outcomes between the intermediate-risk groups. A total of 175 patients were analyzed, with a mean age of 44.85 years (SD 15.5), of which 86% (150/175) were women. In the baseline, a total of 75% (131/175) were classified as intermediate-low-risk. In clinical follow-up, 40% (61/154) were classified as intermediate-low-risk, 21% (32/154) were classified as intermediate-low-risk, 23% (35/154) were classified as intermediate-low-risk, and 16% (26/154) as intermediate-high-risk. At baseline, WHO FC III was 61% (107/174), compared to 35% (56/154) at follow-up (p = 0.083). The use of bosentan decreased from 36% (63/175) to 28% (46/154) (p < 0.001), while ambrisentan increased from 18% (31/175) to 30% (47/154), and macitentan increased from 25% (44/175) to 36% (57/154). The use of parenteral prostanoids and selexipag increased by 20% (4% vs. 24%) and 3% (1% vs. 4%) during clinical follow-up, respectively. Overall survival at 1 year of follow-up was 96%, at 2 years 92%, and at 3 years 88%. The survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 98%, 95%, and 90% in the intermediate-low-risk group, and 90%, 80%, and 80% in the intermediate-high-risk group. In this real-world study of PAH in the Colombian HAPredCO registry, the median survival in the intermediate-low-risk group was slightly higher than in the intermediate-high-risk group. At baseline, most patients were classified as intermediate-low-risk. However, during clinical follow-up, risk distribution changed, with a notable proportion shifting across different risk categories.
期刊介绍:
Pulmonary Circulation''s main goal is to encourage basic, translational, and clinical research by investigators, physician-scientists, and clinicans, in the hope of increasing survival rates for pulmonary hypertension and other pulmonary vascular diseases worldwide, and developing new therapeutic approaches for the diseases. Freely available online, Pulmonary Circulation allows diverse knowledge of research, techniques, and case studies to reach a wide readership of specialists in order to improve patient care and treatment outcomes.