利用基于生理的药代动力学模型评估Dordaviprone患者的细胞色素P450药物相互作用风险。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Swati Jaiswal, Nikunjkumar K Patel, Hannah M Jones, Savannah McFeely, Shamia L Faison, Tim Tippin, Odin Naderer
{"title":"利用基于生理的药代动力学模型评估Dordaviprone患者的细胞色素P450药物相互作用风险。","authors":"Swati Jaiswal, Nikunjkumar K Patel, Hannah M Jones, Savannah McFeely, Shamia L Faison, Tim Tippin, Odin Naderer","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed and verified for dordaviprone, a small molecule with antitumor effects in glioma patients. The model was applied to assess the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of dordaviprone as a victim of CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers, and as a perpetrator of CYP3A4, CYP2C8, CYP2D6 inhibition. A combination of in vitro and clinical data was used to develop a minimal distribution PBPK model with a single adjusting compartment and mechanistic absorption using the Simcyp Population-Based Simulator (V21). Simulated maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration time curve (AUC) of the 3 clinical studies used to verify the PBPK model were within 1.4-fold of observed exposures. The simulated increase in dordaviprone AUC and Cmax (4.6- and 1.7-fold) following administration of multiple doses of itraconazole was consistent with the observed values (4.4- and 1.9-fold). All PBPK-simulated changes in dordaviprone plasma exposure when administered with CYP3A4 moderate (erythromycin, fluconazole) and weak (cimetidine) inhibitors, and moderate (efavirenz) and strong (rifampicin) inducers were consistent with their CYP3A4 potency classification (AUC ratio = 2.68, 2.48, 1.42, 0.35, and 0.17, respectively). The simulated AUC and Cmax of probe substrates for CYP3A4 (midazolam), CYP2C8 (repaglinide) and CYP2D6 (desipramine) after coadministration with 625 mg dordaviprone were the same as those in the absence of dordaviprone (ratio = 1.0) and remained unchanged after a sensitivity analysis using 10-fold more potent inhibition constants. Due to changes in dordaviprone plasma exposure when co-administered with CYP3A4 inhibitors, dordaviprone dose adjustments may be necessary; CYP3A4 inducers should be avoided.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Cytochrome P450 Drug Interaction Risk for Dordaviprone Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.\",\"authors\":\"Swati Jaiswal, Nikunjkumar K Patel, Hannah M Jones, Savannah McFeely, Shamia L Faison, Tim Tippin, Odin Naderer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/psp4.70093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed and verified for dordaviprone, a small molecule with antitumor effects in glioma patients. The model was applied to assess the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of dordaviprone as a victim of CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers, and as a perpetrator of CYP3A4, CYP2C8, CYP2D6 inhibition. A combination of in vitro and clinical data was used to develop a minimal distribution PBPK model with a single adjusting compartment and mechanistic absorption using the Simcyp Population-Based Simulator (V21). Simulated maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration time curve (AUC) of the 3 clinical studies used to verify the PBPK model were within 1.4-fold of observed exposures. The simulated increase in dordaviprone AUC and Cmax (4.6- and 1.7-fold) following administration of multiple doses of itraconazole was consistent with the observed values (4.4- and 1.9-fold). All PBPK-simulated changes in dordaviprone plasma exposure when administered with CYP3A4 moderate (erythromycin, fluconazole) and weak (cimetidine) inhibitors, and moderate (efavirenz) and strong (rifampicin) inducers were consistent with their CYP3A4 potency classification (AUC ratio = 2.68, 2.48, 1.42, 0.35, and 0.17, respectively). The simulated AUC and Cmax of probe substrates for CYP3A4 (midazolam), CYP2C8 (repaglinide) and CYP2D6 (desipramine) after coadministration with 625 mg dordaviprone were the same as those in the absence of dordaviprone (ratio = 1.0) and remained unchanged after a sensitivity analysis using 10-fold more potent inhibition constants. Due to changes in dordaviprone plasma exposure when co-administered with CYP3A4 inhibitors, dordaviprone dose adjustments may be necessary; CYP3A4 inducers should be avoided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70093\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建立并验证了脑胶质瘤患者中具有抗肿瘤作用的小分子dordaviprone的生理药代动力学(PBPK)模型。该模型用于评估dordaviprone作为CYP3A4抑制剂和诱诱剂的受害者,以及作为CYP3A4、CYP2C8、CYP2D6抑制的犯罪者的药物-药物相互作用(DDI)潜力。结合体外和临床数据,使用Simcyp基于人群的模拟器(V21)建立最小分布PBPK模型,该模型具有单个调节室和机械吸收。用于验证PBPK模型的3项临床研究的模拟最大浓度(Cmax)和浓度时间曲线下面积(AUC)均在观察暴露量的1.4倍以内。在给予多剂量伊曲康唑后,模拟的dordav易感AUC和Cmax的增加(4.6倍和1.7倍)与观察值(4.4倍和1.9倍)一致。当给予CYP3A4中度(红霉素、氟康唑)和弱(西咪替丁)抑制剂,以及中度(依非韦伦)和强(利福平)诱变剂时,所有pbpk模拟的多达韦易感血浆暴露的变化与其CYP3A4效价分类一致(AUC比分别为2.68、2.48、1.42、0.35和0.17)。与625 mg dordaviprone共给药后,CYP3A4(咪达唑仑)、CYP2C8(瑞格列奈)和CYP2D6(地西帕明)的模拟AUC和Cmax与不含dordaviprone(比值= 1.0)时的AUC和Cmax相同,在使用10倍有效抑制常数进行敏感性分析后保持不变。由于与CYP3A4抑制剂联合给药时多达韦易感性血浆暴露的变化,多达韦易感性剂量调整可能是必要的;应避免使用CYP3A4诱导剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Cytochrome P450 Drug Interaction Risk for Dordaviprone Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.

A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed and verified for dordaviprone, a small molecule with antitumor effects in glioma patients. The model was applied to assess the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of dordaviprone as a victim of CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers, and as a perpetrator of CYP3A4, CYP2C8, CYP2D6 inhibition. A combination of in vitro and clinical data was used to develop a minimal distribution PBPK model with a single adjusting compartment and mechanistic absorption using the Simcyp Population-Based Simulator (V21). Simulated maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration time curve (AUC) of the 3 clinical studies used to verify the PBPK model were within 1.4-fold of observed exposures. The simulated increase in dordaviprone AUC and Cmax (4.6- and 1.7-fold) following administration of multiple doses of itraconazole was consistent with the observed values (4.4- and 1.9-fold). All PBPK-simulated changes in dordaviprone plasma exposure when administered with CYP3A4 moderate (erythromycin, fluconazole) and weak (cimetidine) inhibitors, and moderate (efavirenz) and strong (rifampicin) inducers were consistent with their CYP3A4 potency classification (AUC ratio = 2.68, 2.48, 1.42, 0.35, and 0.17, respectively). The simulated AUC and Cmax of probe substrates for CYP3A4 (midazolam), CYP2C8 (repaglinide) and CYP2D6 (desipramine) after coadministration with 625 mg dordaviprone were the same as those in the absence of dordaviprone (ratio = 1.0) and remained unchanged after a sensitivity analysis using 10-fold more potent inhibition constants. Due to changes in dordaviprone plasma exposure when co-administered with CYP3A4 inhibitors, dordaviprone dose adjustments may be necessary; CYP3A4 inducers should be avoided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.40%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信