{"title":"高钙血症患者尿钙的测定英国内分泌内科医生和外科医生调查结果。","authors":"Muhammad Fahad Arshad, Saba P. Balasubramanian","doi":"10.1111/cen.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In patients with hypercalcaemia, assessment of urinary calcium excretion helps differentiate primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) from familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia (FHH). For this, 24 h calcium to creatinine clearance ratio (CCCR) is recommended, but others tests like random CCCR, 24 h urine calcium excretion (UCE), and calcium to creatinine ratio (CR) are also frequently used.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The survey objective was to evaluate current practice among UK endocrinologists and surgeons.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A web-based anonymous cross-sectional survey, consisting of eight multiple-choice questions was developed using Survey Monkey. The survey was disseminated to members of British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons (BAETS) and Society for Endocrinology (SfE) between November 20, 2025 and December 19, 2024.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Two hundred and sixty-six responses from 210 endocrinologists and 56 surgeons were received (85% consultants). Respondents worked in both university (48.9%) and district hospitals (47.7%). The most commonly performed urine calcium test in hypercalcaemic patients was 24 h UCE (58.6%), but for PHPT versus FHH differentiation, the most preferred test was 24 h CCCR (43.6%), followed by random CCCR (24.8%), 24 h UCE (14.3%), and CR (16.5%). Of respondents who had experience with using CCCR (<i>n</i> = 235), most (55.6%) used a cut-off of > 0.01 to rule out FHH, while > 0.02 cut off was used by 26.7% respondents. Most clinicians (70.3%) used albumin-adjusted calcium for CCCR calculation, and 71.4% respondents considered vitamin D levels ≥ 50 nmol/L to be adequate for urinary calcium measurement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The survey provides valuable insight into current UK practice. 24 h and random CCCR are the most commonly used tests to exclude FHH, but overall, practice varies widely.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10346,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endocrinology","volume":"103 5","pages":"757-760"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cen.70008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urinary Calcium Measurement in Patients With Hypercalcaemia; Endocrine Physicians and Surgeons Survey Results From UK\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Fahad Arshad, Saba P. Balasubramanian\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cen.70008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>In patients with hypercalcaemia, assessment of urinary calcium excretion helps differentiate primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) from familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia (FHH). For this, 24 h calcium to creatinine clearance ratio (CCCR) is recommended, but others tests like random CCCR, 24 h urine calcium excretion (UCE), and calcium to creatinine ratio (CR) are also frequently used.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The survey objective was to evaluate current practice among UK endocrinologists and surgeons.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A web-based anonymous cross-sectional survey, consisting of eight multiple-choice questions was developed using Survey Monkey. The survey was disseminated to members of British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons (BAETS) and Society for Endocrinology (SfE) between November 20, 2025 and December 19, 2024.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Two hundred and sixty-six responses from 210 endocrinologists and 56 surgeons were received (85% consultants). Respondents worked in both university (48.9%) and district hospitals (47.7%). The most commonly performed urine calcium test in hypercalcaemic patients was 24 h UCE (58.6%), but for PHPT versus FHH differentiation, the most preferred test was 24 h CCCR (43.6%), followed by random CCCR (24.8%), 24 h UCE (14.3%), and CR (16.5%). Of respondents who had experience with using CCCR (<i>n</i> = 235), most (55.6%) used a cut-off of > 0.01 to rule out FHH, while > 0.02 cut off was used by 26.7% respondents. Most clinicians (70.3%) used albumin-adjusted calcium for CCCR calculation, and 71.4% respondents considered vitamin D levels ≥ 50 nmol/L to be adequate for urinary calcium measurement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The survey provides valuable insight into current UK practice. 24 h and random CCCR are the most commonly used tests to exclude FHH, but overall, practice varies widely.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"103 5\",\"pages\":\"757-760\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cen.70008\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cen.70008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cen.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Urinary Calcium Measurement in Patients With Hypercalcaemia; Endocrine Physicians and Surgeons Survey Results From UK
Background
In patients with hypercalcaemia, assessment of urinary calcium excretion helps differentiate primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) from familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia (FHH). For this, 24 h calcium to creatinine clearance ratio (CCCR) is recommended, but others tests like random CCCR, 24 h urine calcium excretion (UCE), and calcium to creatinine ratio (CR) are also frequently used.
Objective
The survey objective was to evaluate current practice among UK endocrinologists and surgeons.
Methods
A web-based anonymous cross-sectional survey, consisting of eight multiple-choice questions was developed using Survey Monkey. The survey was disseminated to members of British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons (BAETS) and Society for Endocrinology (SfE) between November 20, 2025 and December 19, 2024.
Results
Two hundred and sixty-six responses from 210 endocrinologists and 56 surgeons were received (85% consultants). Respondents worked in both university (48.9%) and district hospitals (47.7%). The most commonly performed urine calcium test in hypercalcaemic patients was 24 h UCE (58.6%), but for PHPT versus FHH differentiation, the most preferred test was 24 h CCCR (43.6%), followed by random CCCR (24.8%), 24 h UCE (14.3%), and CR (16.5%). Of respondents who had experience with using CCCR (n = 235), most (55.6%) used a cut-off of > 0.01 to rule out FHH, while > 0.02 cut off was used by 26.7% respondents. Most clinicians (70.3%) used albumin-adjusted calcium for CCCR calculation, and 71.4% respondents considered vitamin D levels ≥ 50 nmol/L to be adequate for urinary calcium measurement.
Conclusion
The survey provides valuable insight into current UK practice. 24 h and random CCCR are the most commonly used tests to exclude FHH, but overall, practice varies widely.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Endocrinology publishes papers and reviews which focus on the clinical aspects of endocrinology, including the clinical application of molecular endocrinology. It does not publish papers relating directly to diabetes care and clinical management. It features reviews, original papers, commentaries, correspondence and Clinical Questions. Clinical Endocrinology is essential reading not only for those engaged in endocrinological research but also for those involved primarily in clinical practice.