人工智能超越范围:人工智能和机器学习在遗传咨询研究生课程中的整合和利用的观点

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Ofir Feuer, Kyla Holmes, Sarah Kane, Kathryn M. Curry, Daria Ma, Chloe A. Chatwin, Marie Chuldzhyan, Emily Quinn, Nicholas Gorman
{"title":"人工智能超越范围:人工智能和机器学习在遗传咨询研究生课程中的整合和利用的观点","authors":"Ofir Feuer,&nbsp;Kyla Holmes,&nbsp;Sarah Kane,&nbsp;Kathryn M. Curry,&nbsp;Daria Ma,&nbsp;Chloe A. Chatwin,&nbsp;Marie Chuldzhyan,&nbsp;Emily Quinn,&nbsp;Nicholas Gorman","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Increased utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in genomic medicine and genetic counseling necessitates a well-trained workforce. However, research on the attitudes toward and uptake of AI/ML education among genetic counseling graduate programs (GCGPs) is limited. This mixed-methods study investigated the attitudes, preparedness, and future plans of GCGP leadership toward the integration of AI/ML into curricula and its effect on core competency proficiency. In Phase 1, a nationwide survey gathered quantitative responses from 15 GCGP leaders holding diverse academic positions in genetic counseling program curriculum development. There were mixed perceptions about AI/ML integration into curricula, despite frequent encounters with these technologies in academic settings. Respondents viewed AI/ML as least impactful on interpersonal, psychosocial, and counseling skills within the Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling (ACGC) competencies, highlighting the value of human expertise in these areas. Phase 2 explored the goals, logistics, and barriers of incorporating AI/ML into GCGP curricula over the next 5 years. A second nationwide survey collected demographic information from 18 respondents, of which 5 were interviewed. Reflexive thematic analysis identified nine key themes: Resources and Training for AI/ML Integration, Motivations for AI/ML Integration, Confidence in Leadership Foresight, Formats and Applications of AI/ML Education in GCGPs, Stages of AI/ML Integration, Barriers to AI/ML Integration, Trade-offs to new Curricula, Interpreting Competency Requirements, and Relevant Content and Contexts for Learning. Interviewees highlighted the need for support in the form of resources, training, and guidelines for AI/ML applications in genetic counseling. This study uncovers opportunities for enhancing integration of AI/ML in genetic counseling education, emphasizing the importance of collaboration among organizations, professional societies, and topic experts. Developing a competency framework specific to AI/ML in genetic counseling could promote tool development and dissemination, ultimately increasing the impact of GCGPs in this evolving field.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-scending the scope: Perspectives on the integration and utilization of artificial intelligence and machine learning in genetic counseling graduate programs\",\"authors\":\"Ofir Feuer,&nbsp;Kyla Holmes,&nbsp;Sarah Kane,&nbsp;Kathryn M. Curry,&nbsp;Daria Ma,&nbsp;Chloe A. Chatwin,&nbsp;Marie Chuldzhyan,&nbsp;Emily Quinn,&nbsp;Nicholas Gorman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgc4.70065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Increased utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in genomic medicine and genetic counseling necessitates a well-trained workforce. However, research on the attitudes toward and uptake of AI/ML education among genetic counseling graduate programs (GCGPs) is limited. This mixed-methods study investigated the attitudes, preparedness, and future plans of GCGP leadership toward the integration of AI/ML into curricula and its effect on core competency proficiency. In Phase 1, a nationwide survey gathered quantitative responses from 15 GCGP leaders holding diverse academic positions in genetic counseling program curriculum development. There were mixed perceptions about AI/ML integration into curricula, despite frequent encounters with these technologies in academic settings. Respondents viewed AI/ML as least impactful on interpersonal, psychosocial, and counseling skills within the Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling (ACGC) competencies, highlighting the value of human expertise in these areas. Phase 2 explored the goals, logistics, and barriers of incorporating AI/ML into GCGP curricula over the next 5 years. A second nationwide survey collected demographic information from 18 respondents, of which 5 were interviewed. Reflexive thematic analysis identified nine key themes: Resources and Training for AI/ML Integration, Motivations for AI/ML Integration, Confidence in Leadership Foresight, Formats and Applications of AI/ML Education in GCGPs, Stages of AI/ML Integration, Barriers to AI/ML Integration, Trade-offs to new Curricula, Interpreting Competency Requirements, and Relevant Content and Contexts for Learning. Interviewees highlighted the need for support in the form of resources, training, and guidelines for AI/ML applications in genetic counseling. This study uncovers opportunities for enhancing integration of AI/ML in genetic counseling education, emphasizing the importance of collaboration among organizations, professional societies, and topic experts. Developing a competency framework specific to AI/ML in genetic counseling could promote tool development and dissemination, ultimately increasing the impact of GCGPs in this evolving field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70065\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70065\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)在基因组医学和遗传咨询中的应用越来越多,这就需要一支训练有素的劳动力队伍。然而,关于遗传咨询研究生课程(GCGPs)对AI/ML教育的态度和吸收的研究是有限的。这项混合方法研究调查了GCGP领导层对将AI/ML整合到课程中的态度、准备和未来计划,以及它对核心能力熟练程度的影响。在第一阶段,一项全国性的调查收集了15名GCGP领导人的定量回答,他们在遗传咨询项目课程开发中担任不同的学术职位。尽管在学术环境中经常遇到这些技术,但人们对AI/ML融入课程的看法不一。受访者认为,在遗传咨询认证委员会(ACGC)能力范围内,人工智能/机器学习对人际关系、心理社会和咨询技能的影响最小,强调了人类专业知识在这些领域的价值。第二阶段探讨了未来5年将AI/ML纳入GCGP课程的目标、逻辑和障碍。第二次全国调查收集了18名受访者的人口统计信息,其中5人接受了采访。反思性专题分析确定了九个关键主题:人工智能/机器学习整合的资源和培训、人工智能/机器学习整合的动机、对领导力远见的信心、人工智能/机器学习教育在gcgp中的格式和应用、人工智能/机器学习整合的阶段、人工智能/机器学习整合的障碍、新课程的权衡、解释能力要求以及学习的相关内容和背景。受访者强调需要以资源、培训和指南的形式支持人工智能/机器学习在遗传咨询中的应用。本研究揭示了在遗传咨询教育中加强人工智能/机器学习整合的机会,强调了组织、专业协会和主题专家之间合作的重要性。在遗传咨询中开发特定于AI/ML的能力框架可以促进工具的开发和传播,最终增加gcgp在这一不断发展的领域的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

AI-scending the scope: Perspectives on the integration and utilization of artificial intelligence and machine learning in genetic counseling graduate programs

AI-scending the scope: Perspectives on the integration and utilization of artificial intelligence and machine learning in genetic counseling graduate programs

Increased utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in genomic medicine and genetic counseling necessitates a well-trained workforce. However, research on the attitudes toward and uptake of AI/ML education among genetic counseling graduate programs (GCGPs) is limited. This mixed-methods study investigated the attitudes, preparedness, and future plans of GCGP leadership toward the integration of AI/ML into curricula and its effect on core competency proficiency. In Phase 1, a nationwide survey gathered quantitative responses from 15 GCGP leaders holding diverse academic positions in genetic counseling program curriculum development. There were mixed perceptions about AI/ML integration into curricula, despite frequent encounters with these technologies in academic settings. Respondents viewed AI/ML as least impactful on interpersonal, psychosocial, and counseling skills within the Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling (ACGC) competencies, highlighting the value of human expertise in these areas. Phase 2 explored the goals, logistics, and barriers of incorporating AI/ML into GCGP curricula over the next 5 years. A second nationwide survey collected demographic information from 18 respondents, of which 5 were interviewed. Reflexive thematic analysis identified nine key themes: Resources and Training for AI/ML Integration, Motivations for AI/ML Integration, Confidence in Leadership Foresight, Formats and Applications of AI/ML Education in GCGPs, Stages of AI/ML Integration, Barriers to AI/ML Integration, Trade-offs to new Curricula, Interpreting Competency Requirements, and Relevant Content and Contexts for Learning. Interviewees highlighted the need for support in the form of resources, training, and guidelines for AI/ML applications in genetic counseling. This study uncovers opportunities for enhancing integration of AI/ML in genetic counseling education, emphasizing the importance of collaboration among organizations, professional societies, and topic experts. Developing a competency framework specific to AI/ML in genetic counseling could promote tool development and dissemination, ultimately increasing the impact of GCGPs in this evolving field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信