影响残疾老年人家庭照顾者负担的主要和次要压力源:系统回顾

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jing Li, Khadijah Alavi, Azahah Abu Hassan Shaari
{"title":"影响残疾老年人家庭照顾者负担的主要和次要压力源:系统回顾","authors":"Jing Li,&nbsp;Khadijah Alavi,&nbsp;Azahah Abu Hassan Shaari","doi":"10.1155/hsc/5109659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> With the rapidly aging global population, family caregivers face increased burdens when caring for disabled older adults; however, comprehensive understanding of the determinants remains limited.</p>\n <p><b>Objective:</b> To systematically analyze the factors affecting caregiver burden among family caregivers of disabled older adults within the stress process model framework.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, six electronic databases were searched up to September 2024. The methodological quality was assessed via the JBI critical appraisal tool. Twenty-eight studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Analysis of 28 studies revealed that caregiver burden results from a complex stress process involving distinct patterns of stressors and moderators. Primary stressors included care recipients’ functional limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs), behavioral problems, and cognitive impairments, with functional dependency and behavioral problems showing consistent positive correlations with burden. The secondary stressors included caregivers’ psychological factors (depression and anxiety) and socioeconomic circumstances, with caregiving time, depressive symptoms, and financial difficulties demonstrating strong positive associations with burden. Conversely, caregiver health status and cohabitation were negatively correlated with burden. Moderating factors—particularly social support, service utilization, and psychological resources such as resilience and coping strategies—consistently demonstrated significant protective effects against caregiver burden.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> The stress process model effectively frames the multifaceted nature of caregiver burden, highlighting the interaction between primary and secondary stressors. Future interventions should adopt a dual-focus approach, addressing both primary care-related stressors and secondary psychosocial factors while strengthening moderating resources to enhance caregivers’ quality of life.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/5109659","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary and Secondary Stressors Affecting Family Caregiver Burden for Disabled Older Adults: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Jing Li,&nbsp;Khadijah Alavi,&nbsp;Azahah Abu Hassan Shaari\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/hsc/5109659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Background:</b> With the rapidly aging global population, family caregivers face increased burdens when caring for disabled older adults; however, comprehensive understanding of the determinants remains limited.</p>\\n <p><b>Objective:</b> To systematically analyze the factors affecting caregiver burden among family caregivers of disabled older adults within the stress process model framework.</p>\\n <p><b>Methods:</b> In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, six electronic databases were searched up to September 2024. The methodological quality was assessed via the JBI critical appraisal tool. Twenty-eight studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> Analysis of 28 studies revealed that caregiver burden results from a complex stress process involving distinct patterns of stressors and moderators. Primary stressors included care recipients’ functional limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs), behavioral problems, and cognitive impairments, with functional dependency and behavioral problems showing consistent positive correlations with burden. The secondary stressors included caregivers’ psychological factors (depression and anxiety) and socioeconomic circumstances, with caregiving time, depressive symptoms, and financial difficulties demonstrating strong positive associations with burden. Conversely, caregiver health status and cohabitation were negatively correlated with burden. Moderating factors—particularly social support, service utilization, and psychological resources such as resilience and coping strategies—consistently demonstrated significant protective effects against caregiver burden.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> The stress process model effectively frames the multifaceted nature of caregiver burden, highlighting the interaction between primary and secondary stressors. Future interventions should adopt a dual-focus approach, addressing both primary care-related stressors and secondary psychosocial factors while strengthening moderating resources to enhance caregivers’ quality of life.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/5109659\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/5109659\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/5109659","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着全球人口迅速老龄化,家庭照顾者在照顾残疾老年人时面临越来越大的负担;然而,对决定因素的全面理解仍然有限。目的:在应激过程模型框架下,系统分析残疾老年人家庭照顾者照顾负担的影响因素。方法:按照PRISMA指南检索截至2024年9月的6个电子数据库。方法质量通过JBI关键评估工具进行评估。我们分析了28项符合纳入标准的研究。结果:对28项研究的分析表明,照顾者负担是一个复杂的压力过程,涉及不同的压力源和调节因子。主要压力源包括日常生活活动功能限制、行为问题和认知障碍,功能依赖和行为问题与负担呈一致的正相关。次要压力源包括照顾者的心理因素(抑郁和焦虑)和社会经济环境,照顾时间、抑郁症状和经济困难与负担表现出强烈的正相关。相反,照顾者健康状况和同居与负担负相关。调节因素——特别是社会支持、服务利用和心理资源(如恢复力和应对策略)——始终显示出对照顾者负担的显著保护作用。结论:压力过程模型有效地描述了照顾者负担的多面性,突出了主、次压力源之间的相互作用。未来的干预措施应采取双重重点的方法,解决与初级保健相关的压力源和次要的社会心理因素,同时加强调节资源,以提高护理者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Primary and Secondary Stressors Affecting Family Caregiver Burden for Disabled Older Adults: A Systematic Review

Primary and Secondary Stressors Affecting Family Caregiver Burden for Disabled Older Adults: A Systematic Review

Background: With the rapidly aging global population, family caregivers face increased burdens when caring for disabled older adults; however, comprehensive understanding of the determinants remains limited.

Objective: To systematically analyze the factors affecting caregiver burden among family caregivers of disabled older adults within the stress process model framework.

Methods: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, six electronic databases were searched up to September 2024. The methodological quality was assessed via the JBI critical appraisal tool. Twenty-eight studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed.

Results: Analysis of 28 studies revealed that caregiver burden results from a complex stress process involving distinct patterns of stressors and moderators. Primary stressors included care recipients’ functional limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs), behavioral problems, and cognitive impairments, with functional dependency and behavioral problems showing consistent positive correlations with burden. The secondary stressors included caregivers’ psychological factors (depression and anxiety) and socioeconomic circumstances, with caregiving time, depressive symptoms, and financial difficulties demonstrating strong positive associations with burden. Conversely, caregiver health status and cohabitation were negatively correlated with burden. Moderating factors—particularly social support, service utilization, and psychological resources such as resilience and coping strategies—consistently demonstrated significant protective effects against caregiver burden.

Conclusion: The stress process model effectively frames the multifaceted nature of caregiver burden, highlighting the interaction between primary and secondary stressors. Future interventions should adopt a dual-focus approach, addressing both primary care-related stressors and secondary psychosocial factors while strengthening moderating resources to enhance caregivers’ quality of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信