{"title":"公司所有制类型与国际化战略:母国资本主义的调节作用","authors":"Israa Kishk , Rekha Rao-Nicholson","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite widespread academic consensus that firm ownership impacts internationalization, there is disagreement on which ownership type increases internationalization. Also, the risk differentials of internationalization strategies need to be considered: sales internationalization (a low-risk strategy) and asset internationalization (a high-risk strategy). Furthermore, home-country capitalism can moderate these relationships – a relationship unexamined in such research. Using a sample of US, Western European, and emerging-market firms, this paper addresses these research gaps. It examines how five different firm-ownership types (government, family, institutional, managerial, and corporate) and home-country capitalism influence internationalization strategies. We find that government ownership reduces sales internationalization. Family and institutional ownership increases sales internationalization, whereas institutional, managerial, and corporate ownership increases asset internationalization. Higher home-country capitalism reduces the impact of institutional and corporate owners on sales internationalization while increasing the impact of all five ownership types on asset internationalization. Our findings have implications for corporate governance and internationalization literature and practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 6","pages":"Article 102489"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate ownership types and internationalization strategies: The moderating role of home country capitalism\",\"authors\":\"Israa Kishk , Rekha Rao-Nicholson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite widespread academic consensus that firm ownership impacts internationalization, there is disagreement on which ownership type increases internationalization. Also, the risk differentials of internationalization strategies need to be considered: sales internationalization (a low-risk strategy) and asset internationalization (a high-risk strategy). Furthermore, home-country capitalism can moderate these relationships – a relationship unexamined in such research. Using a sample of US, Western European, and emerging-market firms, this paper addresses these research gaps. It examines how five different firm-ownership types (government, family, institutional, managerial, and corporate) and home-country capitalism influence internationalization strategies. We find that government ownership reduces sales internationalization. Family and institutional ownership increases sales internationalization, whereas institutional, managerial, and corporate ownership increases asset internationalization. Higher home-country capitalism reduces the impact of institutional and corporate owners on sales internationalization while increasing the impact of all five ownership types on asset internationalization. Our findings have implications for corporate governance and internationalization literature and practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Business Review\",\"volume\":\"34 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 102489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593125001027\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593125001027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Corporate ownership types and internationalization strategies: The moderating role of home country capitalism
Despite widespread academic consensus that firm ownership impacts internationalization, there is disagreement on which ownership type increases internationalization. Also, the risk differentials of internationalization strategies need to be considered: sales internationalization (a low-risk strategy) and asset internationalization (a high-risk strategy). Furthermore, home-country capitalism can moderate these relationships – a relationship unexamined in such research. Using a sample of US, Western European, and emerging-market firms, this paper addresses these research gaps. It examines how five different firm-ownership types (government, family, institutional, managerial, and corporate) and home-country capitalism influence internationalization strategies. We find that government ownership reduces sales internationalization. Family and institutional ownership increases sales internationalization, whereas institutional, managerial, and corporate ownership increases asset internationalization. Higher home-country capitalism reduces the impact of institutional and corporate owners on sales internationalization while increasing the impact of all five ownership types on asset internationalization. Our findings have implications for corporate governance and internationalization literature and practice.
期刊介绍:
The International Business Review (IBR) stands as a premier international journal within the realm of international business and proudly serves as the official publication of the European International Business Academy (EIBA). This esteemed journal publishes original and insightful papers addressing the theory and practice of international business, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics such as firms' internationalization strategies, cross-border management of operations, and comparative studies of business environments across different countries. In essence, IBR is dedicated to disseminating research that informs the international operations of firms, whether they are SMEs or large MNEs, and guides the actions of policymakers in both home and host countries. The journal warmly welcomes conceptual papers, empirical studies, and review articles, fostering contributions from various disciplines including strategy, finance, management, marketing, economics, HRM, and organizational studies. IBR embraces methodological diversity, with equal openness to papers utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches.