{"title":"蜂蜜经高压、超声和高温处理后贮藏过程中的结晶和抗生素残留","authors":"Nikolaos D. Sidirokastritis , Dimitrios Kanelis , Chrysoula Tananaki , Patroklos Vareltzis","doi":"10.1016/j.fbp.2025.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Crystallization and antibiotic residues are both damaging factors for the perceived quality of honey. The storage conditions affect the crystallization rate of the honey and the persistence of antibiotic residues. This research focuses on investigating the crystallization rate and the reduction of sulfathiazole and tetracycline hydrochloride residues in spiked honey during storage (180 days at 25 & −20 °C) after high hydrostatic pressure processing. This treatment was compared to untreated, ultrasound-treated (50 kHz, 200 W, 2 h), and heat-treated (63 °C, 30 min) honey samples spiked with sulfathiazole and tetracycline hydrochloride under identical storage conditions. Measurements were conducted at 3 time points (30, 90 & 180 days). Pressure treatment (580 MPa, 6 min, 25 °C) was carried out in an industrial facility. The percentage of crystals during storage was increased for the pressure-treated samples. At the end of the storage period (180 days, 25 °C) the percentage of crystals in pressure treated honey was 44.83 %, significantly (p < 0.05) higher than the corresponding percentage for unprocessed honey (35.77 %). For both antibiotics, pressure led to an increased reduction of residues during storage, while in most cases it recorded lower half-life values of antibiotics than the other two treatments. Pressure-treated honey also recorded significantly lower half-life values compared to unprocessed honey. At 25 °C, the half-life of tetracycline hydrochloride in the unprocessed honey was 223 days, more than three times higher than the half-life in pressure-treated honey (62 days). The half-life of sulfathiazole in unprocessed honey was 281 days, almost three times higher than that in pressure-treated honey (106 days). In conclusion, high hydrostatic pressure processing is a promising treatment for reducing residues during honey storage. However, the acceleration of crystallization should be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12134,"journal":{"name":"Food and Bioproducts Processing","volume":"153 ","pages":"Pages 389-399"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crystallization and antibiotic residues in honey during storage after treatment with high hydrostatic pressure, ultrasound and heat\",\"authors\":\"Nikolaos D. Sidirokastritis , Dimitrios Kanelis , Chrysoula Tananaki , Patroklos Vareltzis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fbp.2025.07.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Crystallization and antibiotic residues are both damaging factors for the perceived quality of honey. The storage conditions affect the crystallization rate of the honey and the persistence of antibiotic residues. This research focuses on investigating the crystallization rate and the reduction of sulfathiazole and tetracycline hydrochloride residues in spiked honey during storage (180 days at 25 & −20 °C) after high hydrostatic pressure processing. This treatment was compared to untreated, ultrasound-treated (50 kHz, 200 W, 2 h), and heat-treated (63 °C, 30 min) honey samples spiked with sulfathiazole and tetracycline hydrochloride under identical storage conditions. Measurements were conducted at 3 time points (30, 90 & 180 days). Pressure treatment (580 MPa, 6 min, 25 °C) was carried out in an industrial facility. The percentage of crystals during storage was increased for the pressure-treated samples. At the end of the storage period (180 days, 25 °C) the percentage of crystals in pressure treated honey was 44.83 %, significantly (p < 0.05) higher than the corresponding percentage for unprocessed honey (35.77 %). For both antibiotics, pressure led to an increased reduction of residues during storage, while in most cases it recorded lower half-life values of antibiotics than the other two treatments. Pressure-treated honey also recorded significantly lower half-life values compared to unprocessed honey. At 25 °C, the half-life of tetracycline hydrochloride in the unprocessed honey was 223 days, more than three times higher than the half-life in pressure-treated honey (62 days). The half-life of sulfathiazole in unprocessed honey was 281 days, almost three times higher than that in pressure-treated honey (106 days). In conclusion, high hydrostatic pressure processing is a promising treatment for reducing residues during honey storage. However, the acceleration of crystallization should be considered.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and Bioproducts Processing\",\"volume\":\"153 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 389-399\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and Bioproducts Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960308525001440\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Bioproducts Processing","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960308525001440","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Crystallization and antibiotic residues in honey during storage after treatment with high hydrostatic pressure, ultrasound and heat
Crystallization and antibiotic residues are both damaging factors for the perceived quality of honey. The storage conditions affect the crystallization rate of the honey and the persistence of antibiotic residues. This research focuses on investigating the crystallization rate and the reduction of sulfathiazole and tetracycline hydrochloride residues in spiked honey during storage (180 days at 25 & −20 °C) after high hydrostatic pressure processing. This treatment was compared to untreated, ultrasound-treated (50 kHz, 200 W, 2 h), and heat-treated (63 °C, 30 min) honey samples spiked with sulfathiazole and tetracycline hydrochloride under identical storage conditions. Measurements were conducted at 3 time points (30, 90 & 180 days). Pressure treatment (580 MPa, 6 min, 25 °C) was carried out in an industrial facility. The percentage of crystals during storage was increased for the pressure-treated samples. At the end of the storage period (180 days, 25 °C) the percentage of crystals in pressure treated honey was 44.83 %, significantly (p < 0.05) higher than the corresponding percentage for unprocessed honey (35.77 %). For both antibiotics, pressure led to an increased reduction of residues during storage, while in most cases it recorded lower half-life values of antibiotics than the other two treatments. Pressure-treated honey also recorded significantly lower half-life values compared to unprocessed honey. At 25 °C, the half-life of tetracycline hydrochloride in the unprocessed honey was 223 days, more than three times higher than the half-life in pressure-treated honey (62 days). The half-life of sulfathiazole in unprocessed honey was 281 days, almost three times higher than that in pressure-treated honey (106 days). In conclusion, high hydrostatic pressure processing is a promising treatment for reducing residues during honey storage. However, the acceleration of crystallization should be considered.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the European Federation of Chemical Engineering:
Part C
FBP aims to be the principal international journal for publication of high quality, original papers in the branches of engineering and science dedicated to the safe processing of biological products. It is the only journal to exploit the synergy between biotechnology, bioprocessing and food engineering.
Papers showing how research results can be used in engineering design, and accounts of experimental or theoretical research work bringing new perspectives to established principles, highlighting unsolved problems or indicating directions for future research, are particularly welcome. Contributions that deal with new developments in equipment or processes and that can be given quantitative expression are encouraged. The journal is especially interested in papers that extend the boundaries of food and bioproducts processing.
The journal has a strong emphasis on the interface between engineering and food or bioproducts. Papers that are not likely to be published are those:
• Primarily concerned with food formulation
• That use experimental design techniques to obtain response surfaces but gain little insight from them
• That are empirical and ignore established mechanistic models, e.g., empirical drying curves
• That are primarily concerned about sensory evaluation and colour
• Concern the extraction, encapsulation and/or antioxidant activity of a specific biological material without providing insight that could be applied to a similar but different material,
• Containing only chemical analyses of biological materials.