{"title":"阿拉伯国家和沙特阿拉伯中风后住院和康复中心的住院时间:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Abdullah I Alhusayni, Abdullah H Alzahrani","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2025.256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke rehabilitation is a vital component of post-stroke care, and the length of stay (LOS) in hospitals and rehabilitation centers varies across healthcare systems. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed LOS among stroke survivors in Arab countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search identified studies reporting LOS in stroke rehabilitation. A comprehensive literature search from the inception until March 2025 identified studies reporting LOS in stroke rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 publications (25 datasets) involving 12 690 individuals were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled mean LOS was 25.67 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 16.22-35.11]. Subgroup analyses showed a longer LOS in Saudi Arabia (37.03 days, 95% CI: 24.11-49.95) compared to other Arab countries (8.87 days, 95% CI: 4.90-12.84), and in rehabilitation centers (46.71 days, 95% CI: 33.18-60.24) compared to acute hospital settings (9.07 days, 95% CI: 5.27-12.86). LOS varies widely across Arab countries and care settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the need to examine whether differences in LOS are associated with functional recovery and healthcare efficiency. However, substantial heterogeneity across studies and a lack of outcome data limit the interpretability of the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":93875,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Saudi medicine","volume":"45 4","pages":"256-269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12318247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Length of stay in hospital and rehabilitation centers after stroke in Arab countries and Saudi Arabia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah I Alhusayni, Abdullah H Alzahrani\",\"doi\":\"10.5144/0256-4947.2025.256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke rehabilitation is a vital component of post-stroke care, and the length of stay (LOS) in hospitals and rehabilitation centers varies across healthcare systems. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed LOS among stroke survivors in Arab countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search identified studies reporting LOS in stroke rehabilitation. A comprehensive literature search from the inception until March 2025 identified studies reporting LOS in stroke rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 publications (25 datasets) involving 12 690 individuals were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled mean LOS was 25.67 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 16.22-35.11]. Subgroup analyses showed a longer LOS in Saudi Arabia (37.03 days, 95% CI: 24.11-49.95) compared to other Arab countries (8.87 days, 95% CI: 4.90-12.84), and in rehabilitation centers (46.71 days, 95% CI: 33.18-60.24) compared to acute hospital settings (9.07 days, 95% CI: 5.27-12.86). LOS varies widely across Arab countries and care settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the need to examine whether differences in LOS are associated with functional recovery and healthcare efficiency. However, substantial heterogeneity across studies and a lack of outcome data limit the interpretability of the results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Saudi medicine\",\"volume\":\"45 4\",\"pages\":\"256-269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12318247/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Saudi medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2025.256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Saudi medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2025.256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Length of stay in hospital and rehabilitation centers after stroke in Arab countries and Saudi Arabia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Stroke rehabilitation is a vital component of post-stroke care, and the length of stay (LOS) in hospitals and rehabilitation centers varies across healthcare systems. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed LOS among stroke survivors in Arab countries.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search identified studies reporting LOS in stroke rehabilitation. A comprehensive literature search from the inception until March 2025 identified studies reporting LOS in stroke rehabilitation.
Results: A total of 18 publications (25 datasets) involving 12 690 individuals were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled mean LOS was 25.67 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 16.22-35.11]. Subgroup analyses showed a longer LOS in Saudi Arabia (37.03 days, 95% CI: 24.11-49.95) compared to other Arab countries (8.87 days, 95% CI: 4.90-12.84), and in rehabilitation centers (46.71 days, 95% CI: 33.18-60.24) compared to acute hospital settings (9.07 days, 95% CI: 5.27-12.86). LOS varies widely across Arab countries and care settings.
Conclusion: These findings highlight the need to examine whether differences in LOS are associated with functional recovery and healthcare efficiency. However, substantial heterogeneity across studies and a lack of outcome data limit the interpretability of the results.