通过HTA机构的早期科学建议加强发展战略——卫生技术开发人员的经验、期望和最佳做法。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Ting Wang, Neil McAuslane
{"title":"通过HTA机构的早期科学建议加强发展战略——卫生技术开发人员的经验、期望和最佳做法。","authors":"Ting Wang, Neil McAuslane","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00851-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early health technology assessment (HTA) advice provides value to pharmaceutical companies during drug development by identifying potential data gaps, refining study designs, and improving understanding of HTA agencies' evidentiary requirements. This study evaluated the landscape, benefits, and challenges of early HTA advice, with a focus on European agencies and global practices amid the transition to the EU HTA Regulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A perception survey involving 12 pharmaceutical companies explored engagement with HTA agencies, challenges, and strategic priorities. Additionally, a forum was conducted with 22 company representatives, discussing internal and external best practices. Key topics included the evolving role of Joint Scientific Consultations (JSCs), integration of real-world evidence (RWE), and incorporation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into advice processes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings highlighted active engagement with national agencies such as NICE and G-BA and European initiatives like EUnetHTA Joint Actions. NICE advice was valued for cost-effectiveness insights, but its post-Brexit absence reduced collaboration at the European level. JSCs under the EU HTA Regulation were seen as critical, but resource constraints and limited availability posed challenges. Companies prioritized topics such as comparator choices, outcome measures, and RWE but faced internal barriers like resource allocation and unclear decision criteria. Outside Europe, uptake of advice services, such as those from CDA-AMC, remained limited but underscored the potential of lifecycle approaches for iterative learning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early HTA advice is essential in pharmaceutical development. Enhancing JSC capacity, stakeholder engagement, and feedback mechanisms will strengthen alignment between companies and HTA agencies, fostering evidence-based decision-making and improved health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Development Strategies Through Early Scientific Advice from HTA Agencies-Experiences, Expectations and Best Practices from Health Technology Developers.\",\"authors\":\"Ting Wang, Neil McAuslane\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43441-025-00851-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early health technology assessment (HTA) advice provides value to pharmaceutical companies during drug development by identifying potential data gaps, refining study designs, and improving understanding of HTA agencies' evidentiary requirements. This study evaluated the landscape, benefits, and challenges of early HTA advice, with a focus on European agencies and global practices amid the transition to the EU HTA Regulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A perception survey involving 12 pharmaceutical companies explored engagement with HTA agencies, challenges, and strategic priorities. Additionally, a forum was conducted with 22 company representatives, discussing internal and external best practices. Key topics included the evolving role of Joint Scientific Consultations (JSCs), integration of real-world evidence (RWE), and incorporation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into advice processes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings highlighted active engagement with national agencies such as NICE and G-BA and European initiatives like EUnetHTA Joint Actions. NICE advice was valued for cost-effectiveness insights, but its post-Brexit absence reduced collaboration at the European level. JSCs under the EU HTA Regulation were seen as critical, but resource constraints and limited availability posed challenges. Companies prioritized topics such as comparator choices, outcome measures, and RWE but faced internal barriers like resource allocation and unclear decision criteria. Outside Europe, uptake of advice services, such as those from CDA-AMC, remained limited but underscored the potential of lifecycle approaches for iterative learning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early HTA advice is essential in pharmaceutical development. Enhancing JSC capacity, stakeholder engagement, and feedback mechanisms will strengthen alignment between companies and HTA agencies, fostering evidence-based decision-making and improved health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00851-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00851-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

早期卫生技术评估(HTA)建议通过识别潜在的数据差距、改进研究设计和提高对HTA机构证据要求的理解,为制药公司在药物开发过程中提供价值。本研究评估了早期HTA建议的前景、好处和挑战,重点关注欧洲机构和向欧盟HTA法规过渡期间的全球实践。方法:一项涉及12家制药公司的感知调查探讨了与HTA机构的合作、挑战和战略重点。此外,还与22家公司代表举行了论坛,讨论内部和外部最佳做法。主要议题包括联合科学磋商(JSCs)的作用演变、现实证据的整合(RWE)以及将患者报告的结果(PROs)纳入咨询过程。结果:调查结果强调了与NICE和G-BA等国家机构以及EUnetHTA联合行动等欧洲倡议的积极参与。NICE的建议因其成本效益见解而受到重视,但英国脱欧后,NICE的缺席减少了欧洲层面的合作。欧盟HTA条例下的jsc被视为至关重要,但资源限制和有限的可用性构成了挑战。公司优先考虑比较国选择、结果测量和RWE等主题,但面临资源分配和决策标准不明确等内部障碍。在欧洲以外,咨询服务的吸收,例如来自CDA-AMC的咨询服务,仍然有限,但强调了迭代学习的生命周期方法的潜力。结论:早期HTA建议对药物开发至关重要。加强JSC能力、利益攸关方参与和反馈机制将加强公司与HTA机构之间的协调,促进基于证据的决策并改善健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Development Strategies Through Early Scientific Advice from HTA Agencies-Experiences, Expectations and Best Practices from Health Technology Developers.

Introduction: Early health technology assessment (HTA) advice provides value to pharmaceutical companies during drug development by identifying potential data gaps, refining study designs, and improving understanding of HTA agencies' evidentiary requirements. This study evaluated the landscape, benefits, and challenges of early HTA advice, with a focus on European agencies and global practices amid the transition to the EU HTA Regulation.

Methods: A perception survey involving 12 pharmaceutical companies explored engagement with HTA agencies, challenges, and strategic priorities. Additionally, a forum was conducted with 22 company representatives, discussing internal and external best practices. Key topics included the evolving role of Joint Scientific Consultations (JSCs), integration of real-world evidence (RWE), and incorporation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into advice processes.

Results: The findings highlighted active engagement with national agencies such as NICE and G-BA and European initiatives like EUnetHTA Joint Actions. NICE advice was valued for cost-effectiveness insights, but its post-Brexit absence reduced collaboration at the European level. JSCs under the EU HTA Regulation were seen as critical, but resource constraints and limited availability posed challenges. Companies prioritized topics such as comparator choices, outcome measures, and RWE but faced internal barriers like resource allocation and unclear decision criteria. Outside Europe, uptake of advice services, such as those from CDA-AMC, remained limited but underscored the potential of lifecycle approaches for iterative learning.

Conclusions: Early HTA advice is essential in pharmaceutical development. Enhancing JSC capacity, stakeholder engagement, and feedback mechanisms will strengthen alignment between companies and HTA agencies, fostering evidence-based decision-making and improved health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信