苏格兰改善疾病的抗风湿药物处方模式(2019-2023):一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Amanj Kurdi, Euan Proud, Laura Stobo, Morven Millar, Will Clayton, Stuart McTaggart, Tanja Mueller, Marion Bennie
{"title":"苏格兰改善疾病的抗风湿药物处方模式(2019-2023):一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究","authors":"Amanj Kurdi, Euan Proud, Laura Stobo, Morven Millar, Will Clayton, Stuart McTaggart, Tanja Mueller, Marion Bennie","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2544038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing complexity of biologic and targeted therapies for inflammatory rheumatic diseases necessitates robust, real-world evidence to guide clinical decision-making. Scotland's newly established Homecare dataset, capturing ~ 90% of secondary care disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) prescribing, offers a unique national resource to evaluate treatment patterns.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Public Health Scotland's Homecare dataset (2019-2023), including 17,695 patients treated for rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, spondyloarthritis (SpA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), and related conditions. We analysed DMARD utilisation, treatment sequencing, and persistence using descriptive statistics and pathway mapping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 260,054 prescriptions were analysed, with biologic DMARDs comprising 90% of homecare supplies. Adalimumab and etanercept were the predominant agents. TNF inhibitors dominated first-line use, with high persistence rates (78.6%-97.1%), particularly in JIA and SpA. Among switchers, median time on initial therapy was 10.7 months (IQR: 4.2-23.3), decreasing with each subsequent treatment, highlighting the challenges in managing multi-refractory patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first national study to characterise real-world DMARD prescribing in Scotland using comprehensive Homecare data. Findings provide critical benchmarks for therapeutic optimisation, inform guideline development, and support sustainable planning for high-cost medicines delivery in rheumatology.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"519-530"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescribing pattern of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Scotland (2019-2023): a population-based retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Amanj Kurdi, Euan Proud, Laura Stobo, Morven Millar, Will Clayton, Stuart McTaggart, Tanja Mueller, Marion Bennie\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17512433.2025.2544038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing complexity of biologic and targeted therapies for inflammatory rheumatic diseases necessitates robust, real-world evidence to guide clinical decision-making. Scotland's newly established Homecare dataset, capturing ~ 90% of secondary care disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) prescribing, offers a unique national resource to evaluate treatment patterns.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Public Health Scotland's Homecare dataset (2019-2023), including 17,695 patients treated for rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, spondyloarthritis (SpA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), and related conditions. We analysed DMARD utilisation, treatment sequencing, and persistence using descriptive statistics and pathway mapping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 260,054 prescriptions were analysed, with biologic DMARDs comprising 90% of homecare supplies. Adalimumab and etanercept were the predominant agents. TNF inhibitors dominated first-line use, with high persistence rates (78.6%-97.1%), particularly in JIA and SpA. Among switchers, median time on initial therapy was 10.7 months (IQR: 4.2-23.3), decreasing with each subsequent treatment, highlighting the challenges in managing multi-refractory patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first national study to characterise real-world DMARD prescribing in Scotland using comprehensive Homecare data. Findings provide critical benchmarks for therapeutic optimisation, inform guideline development, and support sustainable planning for high-cost medicines delivery in rheumatology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"519-530\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2025.2544038\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2025.2544038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:炎症性风湿病的生物和靶向治疗日益复杂,需要可靠的、真实的证据来指导临床决策。苏格兰新建立的家庭护理数据集,捕获了约90%的二级保健疾病改善抗风湿药物(DMARDs)处方,为评估治疗模式提供了独特的国家资源。研究设计和方法:我们使用苏格兰公共卫生部的家庭护理数据集(2019-2023)进行了一项回顾性队列研究,包括17,695例类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎、脊柱关节炎(SpA)、青少年特发性关节炎(JIA)及相关疾病的患者。我们使用描述性统计和通路映射分析了DMARD的使用、治疗顺序和持久性。结果:共分析260,054张处方,其中生物类dmard占家庭护理用品的90%。阿达木单抗和依那西普是主要药物。TNF抑制剂主要用于一线,持续率高(78.6%-97.1%),特别是JIA和SpA。在转换者中,初始治疗的中位时间为10.7个月(IQR: 4.2-23.3),随着每次后续治疗而减少,突出了管理多重难治性患者的挑战。结论:这是第一个使用综合家庭护理数据来描述苏格兰真实世界DMARD处方的国家研究。研究结果为治疗优化提供了关键基准,为指南制定提供了信息,并支持风湿病高成本药物递送的可持续规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prescribing pattern of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Scotland (2019-2023): a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Background: The increasing complexity of biologic and targeted therapies for inflammatory rheumatic diseases necessitates robust, real-world evidence to guide clinical decision-making. Scotland's newly established Homecare dataset, capturing ~ 90% of secondary care disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) prescribing, offers a unique national resource to evaluate treatment patterns.

Research design and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Public Health Scotland's Homecare dataset (2019-2023), including 17,695 patients treated for rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, spondyloarthritis (SpA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), and related conditions. We analysed DMARD utilisation, treatment sequencing, and persistence using descriptive statistics and pathway mapping.

Results: A total of 260,054 prescriptions were analysed, with biologic DMARDs comprising 90% of homecare supplies. Adalimumab and etanercept were the predominant agents. TNF inhibitors dominated first-line use, with high persistence rates (78.6%-97.1%), particularly in JIA and SpA. Among switchers, median time on initial therapy was 10.7 months (IQR: 4.2-23.3), decreasing with each subsequent treatment, highlighting the challenges in managing multi-refractory patients.

Conclusion: This is the first national study to characterise real-world DMARD prescribing in Scotland using comprehensive Homecare data. Findings provide critical benchmarks for therapeutic optimisation, inform guideline development, and support sustainable planning for high-cost medicines delivery in rheumatology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Advances in drug development technologies are yielding innovative new therapies, from potentially lifesaving medicines to lifestyle products. In recent years, however, the cost of developing new drugs has soared, and concerns over drug resistance and pharmacoeconomics have come to the fore. Adverse reactions experienced at the clinical trial level serve as a constant reminder of the importance of rigorous safety and toxicity testing. Furthermore the advent of pharmacogenomics and ‘individualized’ approaches to therapy will demand a fresh approach to drug evaluation and healthcare delivery. Clinical Pharmacology provides an essential role in integrating the expertise of all of the specialists and players who are active in meeting such challenges in modern biomedical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信