压力下的准政府组织:康涅狄格州绿色银行对预算冲击的反应

IF 3.9 3区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Paul Nix, Adam Goldstein, Michael Oppenheimer
{"title":"压力下的准政府组织:康涅狄格州绿色银行对预算冲击的反应","authors":"Paul Nix,&nbsp;Adam Goldstein,&nbsp;Michael Oppenheimer","doi":"10.1002/eet.2161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Numerous barriers interfere with achieving effective outcomes of climate adaptation and mitigation governance. In the United States, the politicization of climate change and the long-standing susceptibility of long-term projects to politicians' short-term budgetary incentives both heighten the difficulties for effective climate change governance. U.S. quasi-governmental organizations (QGOs) were traditionally created to address several of these barriers in non-climate change domains. The properties of QGOs that allow these organizations to address governance barriers may also allow them to cope with shocks more easily than traditional government agencies. Green banks are an emerging and growing form of dedicated climate change governance in the United States. We use the organizational ambidexterity (OA) framework to evaluate the case of the quasi-governmental Connecticut Green Bank (CGB)'s adaptation to a 2017 state-instigated budget shock. The OA framework is useful for this case study given its emphasis on managerial response to organizational survival threats. We find that the CGB adapted financially to the shock, as a result of mission and financial drift away from Connecticut state control and policy. The CGB's adaptation to the shock hinged on its quasi-governmental status—which allowed it to create a nonprofit organization, Inclusive Prosperity Capital (IPC), and pursue activities to render both entities financially and operationally self-sufficient. We characterize the CGB's adaptive response as <i>hybrid</i>, <i>structural</i>-<i>cyclical</i>, <i>ambidexterity</i>. Our study provides the first empirical description of ambidexterity in the quasi-governmental space and builds evidence for the utility of applying hybrid ambidexterity theory in the climate change domain. The analysis carries implications for a wide array of public and private organizations that must adapt to survival threats by balancing activities that affect short- and long-term viability within the context of their mission orientation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"35 4","pages":"647-661"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quasi-Governmental Organization Under Pressure: The Connecticut Green Bank's Response to a Budget Shock\",\"authors\":\"Paul Nix,&nbsp;Adam Goldstein,&nbsp;Michael Oppenheimer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eet.2161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Numerous barriers interfere with achieving effective outcomes of climate adaptation and mitigation governance. In the United States, the politicization of climate change and the long-standing susceptibility of long-term projects to politicians' short-term budgetary incentives both heighten the difficulties for effective climate change governance. U.S. quasi-governmental organizations (QGOs) were traditionally created to address several of these barriers in non-climate change domains. The properties of QGOs that allow these organizations to address governance barriers may also allow them to cope with shocks more easily than traditional government agencies. Green banks are an emerging and growing form of dedicated climate change governance in the United States. We use the organizational ambidexterity (OA) framework to evaluate the case of the quasi-governmental Connecticut Green Bank (CGB)'s adaptation to a 2017 state-instigated budget shock. The OA framework is useful for this case study given its emphasis on managerial response to organizational survival threats. We find that the CGB adapted financially to the shock, as a result of mission and financial drift away from Connecticut state control and policy. The CGB's adaptation to the shock hinged on its quasi-governmental status—which allowed it to create a nonprofit organization, Inclusive Prosperity Capital (IPC), and pursue activities to render both entities financially and operationally self-sufficient. We characterize the CGB's adaptive response as <i>hybrid</i>, <i>structural</i>-<i>cyclical</i>, <i>ambidexterity</i>. Our study provides the first empirical description of ambidexterity in the quasi-governmental space and builds evidence for the utility of applying hybrid ambidexterity theory in the climate change domain. The analysis carries implications for a wide array of public and private organizations that must adapt to survival threats by balancing activities that affect short- and long-term viability within the context of their mission orientation.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Policy and Governance\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"647-661\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Policy and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.2161\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Policy and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.2161","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多障碍妨碍实现气候适应和缓解治理的有效成果。在美国,气候变化的政治化和长期项目长期易受政治家短期预算激励的影响,都加大了有效治理气候变化的难度。美国的准政府组织(qgo)传统上是为了解决非气候变化领域的一些障碍而创建的。qgo的特性使这些组织能够解决治理障碍,也使它们比传统政府机构更容易应对冲击。绿色银行是美国致力于气候变化治理的一种新兴和不断发展的形式。我们使用组织双重性(OA)框架来评估准政府的康涅狄格州绿色银行(CGB)对2017年国家煽动的预算冲击的适应情况。OA框架对这个案例研究很有用,因为它强调对组织生存威胁的管理响应。我们发现,由于使命和财务偏离了康涅狄格州的控制和政策,CGB在财务上适应了冲击。CGB对冲击的适应取决于它的准政府地位,这使它能够创建一个非营利组织,包容性繁荣资本(IPC),并开展活动,使两个实体在财务和运营上自给自足。我们将CGB的适应性反应描述为混合型、结构周期性、双灵巧性。本研究首次提供了准政府空间中二元性的实证描述,并为混合二元性理论在气候变化领域的应用提供了证据。这一分析对各种各样的公共和私人组织都有影响,这些组织必须在其任务方向范围内平衡影响短期和长期生存能力的活动,以适应生存威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quasi-Governmental Organization Under Pressure: The Connecticut Green Bank's Response to a Budget Shock

Numerous barriers interfere with achieving effective outcomes of climate adaptation and mitigation governance. In the United States, the politicization of climate change and the long-standing susceptibility of long-term projects to politicians' short-term budgetary incentives both heighten the difficulties for effective climate change governance. U.S. quasi-governmental organizations (QGOs) were traditionally created to address several of these barriers in non-climate change domains. The properties of QGOs that allow these organizations to address governance barriers may also allow them to cope with shocks more easily than traditional government agencies. Green banks are an emerging and growing form of dedicated climate change governance in the United States. We use the organizational ambidexterity (OA) framework to evaluate the case of the quasi-governmental Connecticut Green Bank (CGB)'s adaptation to a 2017 state-instigated budget shock. The OA framework is useful for this case study given its emphasis on managerial response to organizational survival threats. We find that the CGB adapted financially to the shock, as a result of mission and financial drift away from Connecticut state control and policy. The CGB's adaptation to the shock hinged on its quasi-governmental status—which allowed it to create a nonprofit organization, Inclusive Prosperity Capital (IPC), and pursue activities to render both entities financially and operationally self-sufficient. We characterize the CGB's adaptive response as hybrid, structural-cyclical, ambidexterity. Our study provides the first empirical description of ambidexterity in the quasi-governmental space and builds evidence for the utility of applying hybrid ambidexterity theory in the climate change domain. The analysis carries implications for a wide array of public and private organizations that must adapt to survival threats by balancing activities that affect short- and long-term viability within the context of their mission orientation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Policy and Governance
Environmental Policy and Governance ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Environmental Policy and Governance is an international, inter-disciplinary journal affiliated with the European Society for Ecological Economics (ESEE). The journal seeks to advance interdisciplinary environmental research and its use to support novel solutions in environmental policy and governance. The journal publishes innovative, high quality articles which examine, or are relevant to, the environmental policies that are introduced by governments or the diverse forms of environmental governance that emerge in markets and civil society. The journal includes papers that examine how different forms of policy and governance emerge and exert influence at scales ranging from local to global and in diverse developmental and environmental contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信